Institutional Quality, Innovation Diffusion and the Dynamics of Income Inequality in Nigeria and South Africa: Evidence from the Fourier ARDL Framework.
Authors
Department of Economics, Faculty of the Social Sciences, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti (Nigeria)
Department of Economics, Faculty of the Social Sciences, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0005
Subject Category: Development Economics
Volume/Issue: 10/14 | Page No: 55-67
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-23
Accepted: 2025-12-29
Published: 2026-01-16
Abstract
This research work investigates the dynamic and long-run relationships among institutional quality, innovation diffusion and income inequality in Nigeria and South Africa using annual time series data. In order to take care of the gradual structural shifts embedded in developing and emerging economies, this study incorporates the Fourier unit root test and Fourier Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag (FARDL) techniques, which give room for smooth and unknown structural breaks. The Fourier unit root results confirm cross-country heterogeneity in the stationary properties of the series and reveal the importance of modelling gradual structural transitions in inequality dynamics. The short-run FARDL results reveal that enhancements in institutional quality reinforce income inequality in both countries, which implies uneven distribution of early institutional gains. Innovation diffusion reveals varying effects, worsening income inequality in Nigeria and reducing inequality in South Africa. Government expenditure on infrastructure and GDP per capita exhibit weak and statistically insignificant short-run impacts on income inequality. In the long-run, institutional quality maintains positive relationship with income inequality in both countries. While innovation diffusion keeps increasing inequality in Nigeria, innovation continues to impact a persistent equalising effect in South Africa. The Significance of the Fourier terms in both economies stresses the influence of smooth structural transitions in moulding inequality outcomes. Generally, the findings in the study substantiate the importance of inclusive institutional reforms and broad-based innovation diffusion in tackling income inequality in African economies
Keywords
Income Inequality; Institutional Quality
Downloads
References
1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adeleye, B. N. (2021). Financial deepening and income inequality in Nigeria: Evidence from Zivot–Andrews and Gregory–Hansen structural break analyses. Economic and Financial Review, 59(1), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. African Union. (2021). Agenda 2063: The Africa we want. https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/36229-doc-agenda_2063_book_7__the_africa_we_want_english.pdf Aghion, P. (2022). Innovation and inequalities. IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities. Institute for Fiscal Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Bergeaud, A., & Hémous, D. (2019). Innovation and top income inequality. Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Asamoah, L. A. (2021). Institutional quality and income inequality: A panel threshold analysis. International Journal of Development Issues, 20(3), 463–480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Berg, A., & Ostry, J. D. (2011). Equality and efficiency. Finance & Development, 48(3), 12–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey–Fuller type unit root tests. Economics Letters, 117(1), 196–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Frydman, C., & Papanikolaou, D. (2015). In search of ideas: Technological innovation and executive compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 47–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gregory, A. W., & Hansen, B. E. (1996). Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. HLPE. (2023). Reducing inequalities for food security and nutrition. Rome, CFS HLPE-FSN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Jauch, S., & Watzka, S. (2016). Financial development and income inequality: A panel data approach. Empirical Economics, 51, 291–314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kunawotor, M. E., Bokpin, G. A., & Barnor, C. (2020). Drivers of income inequality in Africa: Does institutional quality matter? African Development Review, 32(4), 718–729. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Nigeria poverty and inequality report. Abuja, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ncube, M., & Anyanwu, J. C. (2021). Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: Level, trends, and determinants (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 9645). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9645 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Nkoa, B. E. O. (2022). Does institutional quality increase inequalities in Africa? Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(3), 498–517. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361– 1401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Transparency International. (2022). Corruption Perceptions Index 2021. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021/index/nzl [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2021). Sustainable Development Goals: Africa 2021 Review Report. https://unctad.org/system/files/officialdocument/aldc2021d3_en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators and Worldwide Governance Indicators (2023 update). Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023. Geneva: WIPO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the Great Crash, the oil-price shock, and the unitroot hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Financial Development, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Productivity Nexus in Nigeria
- Symbolic Regression for Approximating Analytic Solutions to Differential Equations
- Micro-Credentials in TVET: An Analysis of Trainers’ Perceptions, Challenges, and Benefits in Bridging Skill Gaps in Tertiary Education
- Moneyge It: A Mobile Application for Shared Expense Tracking
- Revisiting the Inflation–Growth Nexus: Evidence from Malaysia Using OLS Estimation