Natural Gas and Energy Transition Goals: A Comparative Policy Analysis
Authors
Center for Petroleum and Energy Resources Economics, University of Abuja (Nigeria)
Center for Petroleum and Energy Resources Economics, University of Abuja (Nigeria)
Center for Petroleum and Energy Resources Economics, University of Abuja (Nigeria)
Center for Petroleum and Energy Resources Economics, University of Abuja (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200305
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 3894-3899
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-29
Accepted: 2026-01-04
Published: 2026-01-17
Abstract
This study assesses natural gas as a transitional fuel in the U.S., Norway, and Nigeria, comparing developed and emerging contexts. Using a policy coding framework, it evaluates regulatory strength, fiscal incentives, institutional effectiveness, and environmental performance. Results reveal governance disparities: the U.S. and Norway exhibit high efficiency and strong environmental controls, while Nigeria’s reforms face infrastructural and institutional constraints. Findings highlight that effective energy transition relies on robust regulation, enforcement, and integrated policy.
Keywords
energy transition, natural gas, policy analysis, methane reduction, gas flaring, Nigeria, Norway, United States.
Downloads
References
1. Asche, F., Misund, B., & Oglend, A. (2022). Natural gas markets and energy transition. Energy Economics, 108, 105882. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bridge, G., Bradshaw, M., & Stephens, J. (2020). Energy transitions: Global and local perspectives. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., & Sokona, Y. (2023). IPCC Special Report on Energy Systems and Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. EIA. (2024). U.S. Energy Outlook 2024. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ejiogu, A. (2022). Nigeria’s gas paradox and the climate conundrum. Energy Policy, 164, 112925. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Energy Institute (2025). Statistical Review of World Energy 2025. London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Energy Institute. (2025). Statistical Review of World Energy. London: EI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. IEA. (2024). Global Methane Tracker (2024). Paris: International Energy Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Fæhn, T., Lindholt, L., & Rosendahl, K. (2022). The green paradox revisited: Norway’s petroleum policy and climate commitments. Environmental Economics & Policy Studies, 24 (1), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Goldthau, A. (2023). The geopolitics of clean energy transitions. Nature Energy, 8, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Goldthau, A., & Sovacool, B. K. (2022). The politics of the energy transition. Global Policy, 13 (S2), 5–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. IEA. (2024). Global Methane Tracker (2024). Paris: International Energy Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Lindholt, L., & Rosendahl, K. (2023). Norway’s petroleum future: Transitioning with integrity. Energy Strategy Reviews, 49, 101078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. NEITI. (2023). Oil and Gas Industry Audit Report 2023. Abuja. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. NPD (2023). Norwegian Petroleum Facts 2023. Oslo: Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. NUPRC (2024). Annual Oil and Gas Industry Report 2024. Abuja: Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Omorogbe, Y., & Oniemola, P. K. (2021). Law and governance in Nigeria’s energy transition. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 39 (3), 321–339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Sovacool, B. K., Hess, D. J., & Griffiths, S. (2020). Sociotechnical transitions, energy justice, and the politics of energy. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 101706. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Stevens, P. (2023). The role of gas in the energy transition: Lessons from global experiences. Chatham House Research Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Van de Graaf, T., Overland, I., Scholten, D., & Westphal, K. (2022). The new map of global energy governance. Global Environmental Politics, 22 (3), 54–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. World Bank. (2024). Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership Data Report. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria