The Pre-Westphalian State System
Authors
Doctoral Student, Diplomacy and International Affairs, EUCLID University (Ghana)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10120074
Subject Category: International Relations
Volume/Issue: 10/12 | Page No: 895-900
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-04
Accepted: 2026-01-10
Published: 2026-01-17
Abstract
In this article, the characteristics and functioning of the pre-Westphalian state system will be examined, detailing its political and diplomatic structures prior to the emergence of modern sovereignty. It provides a conceptual framework that defines state, sovereignty, and international order, underscoring the hierarchical nature of relations, the fusion of religious and political authority, and the flexible territorial boundaries that characterised this period. The article examines mechanisms of governance and diplomacy, such as tributary networks, religious and cultural norms, dynastic marriages, and warfare as a means of conflict resolution. Additionally, it traces the transition from this fragmented medieval order to the emergence of sovereign states, highlighting the impact of the Thirty Years’ War and the Peace of Westphalia (1648) in establishing legal territorial sovereignty and secular diplomacy. By emphasising the historical development of sovereignty, the paper sheds light on the evolution of the international system from a complex, overlapping order to the modern state-centric framework that remains influential today.
Keywords
Pre-Westphalian, State, System
Downloads
References
1. Close, C. W. (2017). City-States, Princely States, and Warfare: Corporate Alliance and State Formation in the Holy Roman Empire (1540–1610). European History Quarterly, 47(2), 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265691416687959 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Dillehay, T. D. (1977). Tawantinsuyu Integration of the Chillon Valley, Peru: A Case of Inca Geo-Political Mastery. Journal of Field Archaeology, 4(4), 397-405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346977791490159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Grzymala-Busse, A. (2020). Beyond War and Contracts: The Medieval and Religious Roots of the European State. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 19-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpolisci-050718-032628 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Hompot, S. (2020). A Discourse Analysis of Recent Mainland Chinese Historiography on the Sinocentric Tributary System of the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368–1912). Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies, 12(1), 149-176. https://doi.org/10.2478/vjeas-2020-0006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Kang, D. C. (2005). Hierarchy in Asian International Relations: 1300-1900. Asian Security, 1(1), 53-79 Kayaoglu, T. (2010). Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory. International Studies Review, 12(2), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00928.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kinra, R. (2020). Revisiting the History and Historiography of Mughal Pluralism. ReOrient, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.5.2.0137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Molineux, C. (2021). A Senegambian King in an Englishman’s Bed: The King of Saloum, Francis Moore, and the Making of Early Modern Sovereignty. Modern Philology, 119(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1086/715024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Reus-Smit, C. (2020). International Relations: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Rózsa, E. N. (2018). Models of State-Formation in the Middle East. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 12(1), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2018.1436130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Saberwal, S. (1991). On the rise of institutions, or the Church and kingship in medieval Europe. Studies in History, 7(1), 106-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/025764309100700105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Sharma, V. S. (2015). Kinship, Property, and Authority. Politics & Society, 43(2), 151-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329215571279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Straumann, B. (2008). The Peace of Westphalia as a Secular Constitution. Constellations, 15(2), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2008.00483.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Sulovsky, V. (2019). The concept of sacrum imperium in historical scholarship. History Compass, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12586 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Thompson, J. W. (1918). Church and State in Mediaeval Germany. I. The American Journal of Theology, 22(1), 72-100. https://doi.org/10.1086/479903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. van Dyke, K. (2005). Beyond Monument Lies Empire: Mapping Songhay Space in Tenth- to Sixteenth- Century West Africa. Res: Anthropology and aesthetics, 48, 33-44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. https://doi.org/10.1086/resv48n1ms20167675 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Yücesoy, H. (2011). Justification of Political Authority in Medieval Sunni Thought. Islam, the State, and Political Authority, 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002020_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- China in South Asia and South America: Connections, Intersections and Similarities
- Prospects and Impediments to China-Africa Sports Cooperation in the Contemporary Era
- Decolonising International Relations: African Perspectives on Global Justice - The Case of the Gambia in the International Court of Justice.
- Climate - Induced Displacement and its Implications on Human Security: A Case Study of Ghana
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) in Promoting and Protecting Local Industries in West Africa (2015 – 2024)