Digital Inclusion in Income-Generating Programmes: Lessons from Malaysia’s IPR and Indonesia’s Social Protection Ecosystem

Authors

Badrul Isa

Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, Selangor Malaysia and Malaysian Academy of SME & Entrepreneurship Development (MASMED), Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Siti Sara Ibrahim

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Rembau Campus, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia and Malaysia and Institute for Big Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (IBDAAI), Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Aida Maria Ismail

Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, Selangor Malaysia and Malaysian Academy of SME & Entrepreneurship Development (MASMED), Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Wan Admiza Wan Hassan

Faculty of Communication and Media Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Rembau Campus, Negeri Sembilan (Malaysia)

Mochammad Hesan

Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Lumajang (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100005

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 40-50

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-10

Accepted: 2025-12-18

Published: 2026-01-17

Abstract

Digitalisation is reshaping how governments deliver social protection and design income-generating programmes for low-income households. Malaysia’s People’s Income Initiative (Inisiatif Pendapatan Rakyat, IPR) aims to eradicate hardcore poverty and raise incomes through structured opportunities in agriculture, food and services, supported by modern delivery systems and partnerships. Indonesia, meanwhile, has spent more than a decade digitising its social protection ecosystem, including the conditional cash transfer Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) and the Non-Cash Food Assistance Programme (Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai, BPNT), shifting from cash and in-kind benefits to electronic accounts, e-vouchers and agent networks. These developments are often framed as pathways to financial and digital inclusion, yet evidence from the ground reveals a more complex reality. Connectivity, literacy, institutional capacity and everyday constraints determine who is reached, who is left behind and how far income support translates into better livelihoods. This article offers a conceptual analysis of digital inclusion in income-generating programmes by drawing lessons from Malaysia’s IPR and Indonesia’s digitalised social protection ecosystem. It synthesises literature on digital and financial inclusion, digital government-to-person (G2P) payments and recent reforms in both countries. The discussion argues that digitalisation can improve convenience, transparency and choice for low-income households and can open pathways to the wider digital economy when accompanied by appropriate support. However, there are also risks of digital exclusion, low or passive use of accounts, over-reliance on imperfect agent networks and the reproduction of existing inequalities when programme design assumes capacities that poor households do not yet have. On the basis of this comparative reflection, the article proposes design principles for digitally enabled income-generating programmes: treating digital channels as enablers rather than gatekeepers, combining digital onboarding with human support, investing in digital and financial literacy, strengthening consumer protection and data safeguards, and using digital systems not only for payments but also for linking participants to markets and services. It concludes by outlining a research agenda on digital inclusion within IPR and similar initiatives, with particular attention to women, rural communities and hardcore poor households.

Keywords

Digital Inclusion, Income-Generating

Downloads

References

1. Banerjee, A. V., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., Satriawan, E., & Sumarto, S. (2022). Electronic food vouchers: Evidence from an at-scale experiment in Indonesia. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1234–1270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bank Negara Malaysia. (2023). Financial inclusion framework 2023–2026: Strategy paper. Bank Negara Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Gosal, G. G., & Nainggolan, R. (2023). The influence of digital financial literacy on Indonesian SMEs’ financial behavior and financial well-being. International Journal of Professional Business Review, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. 8(12), 1–13.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. J-PAL. (2021). The impacts of in-kind food transfers versus electronic vouchers on poverty reduction in Indonesia. Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Khazanah Research Institute. (2022). Digital banking and financial inclusion in Malaysia. Khazanah Research Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lu, M. P., & co-authors. (2024). Financial wellbeing of poor households: The mediating role of digital financial inclusion. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 58(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mansor, M., Sabri, M. F., Mansur, M., Ithnin, M., Magli, A. S., Husniyah, A. R., Mahdzan, N. S., Othman, M. A., Zakaria, R. H., Satar, N. M., & Janor, H. (2022). Analysing the predictors of financial stress and financial well-being among the bottom 40 percent (B40) households in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ministry of Finance Malaysia. (2023). Budget 2023 speech and annexes. Ministry of Finance Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. OECD. (2019). Social protection system review of Indonesia. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Omar, N. A., & Hassan, N. (2023). Bridging the digital divide: Digital financial literacy and financial inclusion among B40 Malaysians. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 41(8), 1682–1703. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Prime Minister’s Office of Malaysia. (2023). MADANI Economy: Empowering the people [Policy document]. Prime Minister’s Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rahman, M., Isa, C. R., Masud, M. M., Sarker, M., & Chowdhury, N. T. (2021). The role of financial behaviour, financial literacy, and financial stress in explaining the financial well-being of B40 group in Malaysia. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rosli, N., & Redzuan, N. H. (2022). The influence of digital financial literacy towards financial inclusion for B40 group in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Sciences (pp. xx– xx). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sofa, W. A. (2023). From Rastra to BPNT: An empirical quantitative evaluation of food assistance reform in Indonesia. Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 69(2), 96–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Theis, S., et al. (2020). Use of bank accounts in Indonesia’s Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). Women’s World Banking. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. TNP2K. (2018). The future of the social protection system in Indonesia: Social protection for all. National Team for the Acceleration of Poverty Reduction. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Women’s World Banking. (2021). Deepening women’s financial inclusion through G2P programs: Indonesia’s Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). Women’s World Banking. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Bank. (2017). Towards a comprehensive, integrated, and effective social assistance system in Indonesia: Social assistance public expenditure review. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. World Bank. (2023). Digital G2P payments and benefits to recipients: G2Px evidence brief. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles