The Whole Government Financial Reporting Quality of Local Authorities in China

High-quality financial reporting enhances government accountability. Previous studies have shown that government financial reports in China are not prepared in accordance with reporting standards, resulting in poor reporting quality. This paper aims to clarify the quality of the whole government financial reporting after the implementation of the new accounting system starting from 2019, and examines the factors that influence the quality. This empirical study employs annual financial reports for quantitative analysis. The research sample is the whole financial reports of 31 provincial local governments in China from 2020 to 2022. The reporting quality is tested using the revised 26 indicators. Consequently, six factors which are size, wealth, timeliness, internal audit findings, educational background, and regional work unit, are tested to examine their influence on the whole government financial reporting (WGFR) quality. The research data were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS. The findings revealed that after the new accounting system was fully implemented, the quality of all financial reporting of the 31 provincial local governments has improved. The average values for 2020-2022 were 77.39, 78.61, and 78.65 respectively with the increasing trend. The average score is 78.22 for 3 years. Three factors are significantly proven to have an influence towards WGFR quality, which are the number of regional work units, the educational background of accountants and the timeliness of financial reporting. However, three other factors which are size, wealth and internal audit findings of local authority are found to be insignificant. The results from this research are useful for the local authorities in China to identify their position and make necessary improvements in their financial reporting for the benefit of the interested parties. Secondly, the results on factors that contribute to the WGFR may be significant to public policymakers to determine the appropriate approach in enhancing the WGFR among local authorities in China. Finally, it has enriched the reference basis for related research.

Government, Accountability, Financial Reporting

1. Agustiningsih, S. W., Murni, S., & Putri, G. A. (2017). Audit findings, local government characteristics, and local government financial statement disclosure. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(3), 179. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agung, M. (2020). The effect of financial reporting quality on regional governments’ performance accountability. KnE Social Sciences, 694-701. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anselmi L, Zarone V, Brunelli S.A .(2017) ‘Evolutionary Transparency Approach to Public Accountability’ [J]. Emerging Issues in Management. Vol. 1 No. 2 pp.103-119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arifin, J. (2020). Domination of regional wealth as a determining factor of financial statement disclosure. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 22(2), 91-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Auditor-General’s Office (AGO), Singapore (2018) ‘What is public accountability?’ www. ago.gov.sg [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bakar, N. B. A. (2016). Developing an accountability disclosure index for statutory bodies: a proposal. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 12(8), 885-899. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bakar, N. B. A., & Saleh, Z. (2015). Review of literature on factors influencing public sector disclosure: The way forward. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 8(2), 155-184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bashir, A., & Amir, A. (2020). International public sector accounting standards and quality of financial reporting in the public sector of Pakistan: Moderating role of accounting information system. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 9(2), pp-467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Beest, F., Braam, G., & Boelens, S. (2009). Quality of financial reporting: Measuring qualitative [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. characteristics. NICE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Carnegie, G. D., & West, B. P. (2005). Making accounting accountable in the public sector. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 16(7), 905-928. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chan, J. L. (2016). Government accounting with Chinese characteristics and challenges. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 201-208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cheng Ting. (2024). Research on the Practice of Improving the Quality of Accounting Information Disclosure in Administrative and Public Institutions. Western Finance and Accounting, (08), 26-29,China [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Christiaens, J. (1999). Financial accounting reform in Flemish municipalities: An empirical investigation. Financial Accountability and Management,15(1), 21-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. community in economic, social decision making and politics. Yogyakarta: YKPN School of Management [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cristiana, I., & Maryono. (2016). Faktor-faktor penentu tingkat pengungkapan laporan keuangan Pemerintah Propinsi Indonesia. Dinamika Akuntansi Keuangan dan Perbankan, 5(2), 188-202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cooper, H. (2015). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (Vol. 2). Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Darmawan, E. (2019). The effect of government accounting standards and government internal control systems on the quality of local government financial statements. JASS (Journal of Accounting for Sustainable Society), 1(02), 108-111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Diptyana, P. (2018). Exploring government internet financial reporting in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 21(1), 115-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Egolum, P. U. (2021). The Effect of Accounting Information on Lending Decision of Quoted Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria. JOURNALS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fauziah, I. 2018. SAP Stanndar Akuntansi Pemerintah (Sesuai Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 71 Tahun 2010) (1sted.). I1mu. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Feriyanti, M., Hermanto, H., & Suransi, N. K. (2015). Determinan kepatuhan pada ketentuan pengungkapan wajib laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah (studi pada kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat). InFestasi, 11(2), 171-185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Furqan, A. C., Wardhani, R., Martani, D., & Setyaningrum, D. (2020). The effect of audit findings and audit recommendation follow-up on the financial report and public service quality in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(5), 535-559. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. GABS (2017), Government Accounting Standards— Basic Standards. China: GABS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gajevszky, A. (2015). Assessing Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Romania. Audit Financiar, 13(121). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gamayuni, R. R. (2018). The effect of internal audit function effectiveness and implementation of accrual based government accounting standard on financial reporting quality. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7(1), 46-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Graue, C. (2015). QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS. International Journal of Sales, Retailing & Marketing, 4(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Guo Yuzhu (2021) ‘Government Audit Function, Public Network Attention and the Level of Local Government Accounting Information Disclosure’ Dissertation, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, China. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hardiningsih, P., Januarti, I., Srimindarti, C., & Oktaviani, R. M. (2019). Does the characteristics of regional government and complexity affect on the disclosure regional financial statements?. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 106-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Harymawan, I., Minanurohman, A., Nasih, M., Shafie, R., & Ismail, I. (2023). Chief financial officer’s educational background from reputable universities and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(4), 566-587. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hasbullah, H. (2023). Analyzing Self-Disclosure Patterns within the Sebatik Island Community and its Relationship with the Republic Of Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(10), e1802-e1802. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Herath, S. K. & Albarqi, N. (2017). Financial reporting quality: A literature review. International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Journal of Business Management and Commerce, 2(2), 1-14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Hilmi, A. Z., & Martani, D. (2012). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat pengungkapan laporan keuangan pemerintah provinsi. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XV, 20, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Indriyati, I., Suryono, A., Pratiwi, R. N., & Amin, F. (2020). The Development of Regional Working Unit Structuring Model in the East Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government. Wacana Journal of Social and Humanity Studies, 23(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ismail, I., Shafie, R., & Ku Ismail, K. N. I. (2021). CFO attributes and accounting conservatism: evidence from Malaysia. Pacific Accounting Review, 33(4), 525-548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ismail, S. and N.B. Abu Bakar, 2011. Reporting practices of Malaysian public universities: The extent of accountability disclosure. Afr. J. Bus. Manag., 5(15): 6366-6376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Jauhari, H., Sari, Y., & Dewata, E. (2019). Implementation of Good Governance, Utilization of Information Technology, and Reliability of Government Financial Statements. JASF: Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 2(2), 117-126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Julita, S. (2018). Analysis of factor affecting the quality of government financial report Bengkalis regency. International Journal Of Scientific &Technology Research, 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Karyatni, N. M. D., & Handajani, L. (2020). The quality of financial statements antecedents and consequences towards financial accountability. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 4(3), 352-362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Khasanah, N. L., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Pengaruh karakteristik, kompleksitas, dan temuan audit terhadap tingkat pengungkapan laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(2), 864-874. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kuntadi, C., Juwanto, C., & Zakaria, M. I. (2023). Factors Affecting the Preparation of Government Financial Statements: Application of Government Accounting Standards, Utilization of Information Technology, and Internal Control System (Literature Review of State Financial Management). Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 4(2), 326-333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Mariani, E., & Utami, W. (2019). The Effects of Local Government Size, Income per Capita, Local Government Wealth and Audit Opinion on the Quality of Internet Financial Reporting Disclosure: Studies in Indonesia. Scholars Bulletin, 5(11), 611-619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Meng Di.(2019). Research on the Influencing Factors and Enhancement Paths of Fiscal Transparency in China (Master's Thesis, Fuzhou University). Master's degree. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27342/d.cnki.gscdu.2023.001080doi:10.27342/d.cnki.gscdu.2023.001080. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Mofolo, M.A,Adonis,V. (2021).Re-engineering imperatives to enhance the effectiveness of municipal public accounts committees in South African municipalities. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review ISSN: (Online) 2310-2152, (Print) 2310-2195. http://www.apsdpr.or. [Accessed 05 September 2022]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Muliyati, D., Amir, A. M., Zahra, F., Yamin, N. Y., & Pakkawaru, M. I. (2021, February). The Effect of the Adoption of Government Accounting Standards, Apparatus Competence and Accounting Information System on the Quality of Local Government Financial Reports. In International Conference on Strategic Issues of Economics, Business and, Education (ICoSIEBE 2020) (pp. 323-326). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Munoz, L. A. , & Bolivar, M. P. (2015). Determining factors of transparancy and accountability in local goverments: a meta analystic study. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 13(2), 129-160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Ningtyas, H. I. R., & Andayani, W. (2019). The effect of government internal control system and government accounting system on performance accountability with the financial quality statements as intervening variables. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 2289-1552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Nur, S. W. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Akuntansi terhadap Kualitas Informasi Laporan Keuangan dengan Akuntabilitas Publik dan Sistem Pengendalian Intern sebagai Varibel Moderating pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Maros, 9, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Nurlinda, Erlina, (2023）’ Quality of Local Government Financial Reports in Indonesia from the Perspective of Reporting, Monitoring and Examination Entity’, Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/AJAG-2023-20-07. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Obazee, U., & Amede, F. O. (2019). CEO attributes and timeliness of financial reporting. Accounting and Taxation Review, 3(3), 12-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Ochung, F. O. (2017). Factors influencing quality of financial reporting in public sector entities in the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, Kca University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Olowokure, A., Muhammad, T. & Terzungwe, N. (2016). Firm structural characteristics and financial reporting quality of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Business Research, 9(1), 106-122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Onyulo, O.F. 2017. Factors Influencing Quality of Financial Reporting in Public Sector Entities in the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Kenya. Kca University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Opanyi, R. O. (2016). The effect of adoption of international public sector accounting standards on quality of financial reports in public sector in Kenya. European Scientific Journal, 12(28), 161-187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Prabtanto, W. D., Apriyanto, G., & Respati, H. (2021). The Effect of Regional Financial Accounting System and Human Resources Competency on Regional Financial Report Accountability with Information Quality Mediation in Probolinggo Regency Government. International Journal of Business Marketing and Management (IJBMM), 6(9), 18-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Raharjo, E. 2007. Teori agensi dan teori stewardship dalam perspektif akuntansi. Jurnal Fokus Ekonomi 2(1): 37-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Rahmatika, D. N., & Afiah, N. N. (2014). The impact of internal audit function effectiveness on quality of financial reporting and its implications on good government governance research on local government Indonesia. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(18), 64-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Ramdhani, D., Fadli, A., Virgina, C., & Pohan, E. (2016). the Organization, Accountability and Performance of Public Organization. Proceeding: The 2 Nd International Conference on Business Management (ICBM 2016), 1(3), 118–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Ren Gang (2014) ‘On The Improvement of Government Financial Information Disclosure of China’. Doctor’s Dissertation, Research Institute for Fiscal Science, Ministry of Finance, P. R. China. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Schillemans T.(2016) Calibrating Public Sector Accountability’ Journal of Public Management Review. Vol. 18. No.9. pp.1400-1420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Schillemans, T., & Busuioc, M. (2015). Predicting public sector accountability: From agency drift to forum drift. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 191-215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Selepe, M. M. (2022). An overview of poor financial reporting and lack of accountability within the South African local government. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(12), 727-737. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Setiyawati, H. (2020). Analysis of the Impact of Financial Statements Quality on Public Accountability. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 10(10), 623-637. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Trisnawati, M. D., & Achmad, K. (2014). Determinan publikasi laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah melalui internet. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) XVII. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. van Helden, J., & Ouda, H. (2016). Public sector accounting in emerging economies. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 40, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Wadi, M. I., Herawati, R. T., & Husnan, L. H. (2016). Causes of delays in budget absorption as the development of good governance on deconcentration and co-administration task budget (A case study at the work unit of DKP-NTB Province). The Indonesian Accounting Review, 6(2), 171-180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Wang Pan. (2025). The Practice and Reflection on the Comprehensive Improvement of Government Financial Report Compilation and Review Quality by the Ningxia Provincial Finance Department. Finance and Accounting, (02), 8-9, China [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Wang wenxiao (2020), ‘Evaluation on the Quality of Local Government Accounting Information Disclosure under the New Government Accounting Standards—Take Shandong as an Example’ Dissertation, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, China. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Wang Wenxiao.(2020). Research on the Quality Evaluation of Local Government Accounting Information Disclosure under the New Government Accounting Standards (Master's Thesis, Shandong University of Finance and Economics). Master's degree [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Wang Ying (2019) ‘Research on Quality Evaluation of Government Accounting Information Disclosure From the Perspective of State Governance Demand’. Dissertation, Southeast University, China [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Widaryani, H. U. (2020). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Quality of Local Government Financial Statements. Accounting Analysis Journal, 9(1), 53-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Yang Zhiyong. (2023). Local Government Debt Risks: Current Situation, Causes and Responses. People's Forum, (09), 68-73, China [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Zandi, G., & Abdullah, N. A. (2019). Financial statements timeliness: The case of Malaysian listed industrial product companies. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24, 127-141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Zhang, E. (2021). Discourses on public sector accounting reforms in China: A brief history (1949–2019). Accounting History, 26(2), 255-279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Zhou Yongmei (2018) 'Evaluation of Provincial Government Accounting Transparency in China '. Journal of Accounting and Economic Research. Vol. 3. No.3. pp.27-41 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Zibaghafa, S., & Chukwu, G. (2024). Public Sector Accounting Standard Adoption and Quality of Financial Reporting in Higher Institutions in Rivers and Bayelsa States, Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 12(3), 1-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors