STEM Learners’ Mastery in Electronic Structure of Atoms: Basis for Academic Intervention

This study investigated the conceptual challenges faced by Grade 12 STEM learners in mastering the electronic structure of atoms, encompassing the quantum mechanical model, energy levels, orbitals, sublevels, electron configuration, and quantum numbers. The research also examines learners’ self-efficacy in understanding these topics. A needs assessment questionnaire, validated by both subject-matter and methods experts, was administered to evaluate learners’ comprehension, alongside a self-efficacy survey to measure confidence in mastering the content. Results indicated generally low confidence among learners, with slightly higher self-assurance reported for determining magnetic properties from electron configurations (40% expressing moderate confidence). Analysis of mastery levels revealed that describing the quantum mechanical model of the atom was the least understood competency, averaging 55% mastery, while other topics—including energy levels, orbitals, sublevels, electron configuration, and quantum numbers—scored below 50%, with quantum numbers being the most poorly grasped concept. These findings underscore the need for targeted instructional interventions addressing the least understood topics and strategies to enhance learners’ confidence, thereby improving conceptual understanding in electronic structure of atoms.

electronic structure of atoms, self-efficacy

1. Adadan, E., & Özdilek, Z. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of different instructional strategies on students’ understanding of atomic structure and electron configuration. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9471-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allred, Z. D. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2019). University chemistry students’ interpretations of multiple representations of the helium atom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(2), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00204B [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hartono, H., & Siahaan, M. (2023). The validity of problems similar to the PISA local context of north sumatra refers to the components of the PISA scientific literacy framework. Journal of Curriculum Indonesia, 6(1), Article 78. https://doi.org/10.46680/jci.v6i1.78 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kiray, S. A. (2016). The pre-service science teachers’ mental models for concept of atoms and learning difficulties. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.85479 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Koponen, I. T., & Jauho, M. (2017). Students’ understanding of quantum mechanical models of the atom: A comparative study of students in physics and chemistry courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 688–702. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00040K [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kyado, J. J., Achor, E. E., & Adah, E. H. (2021). Identification of difficult concepts in chemistry by some secondary school students. [Journal/Publisher info if available] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lei, M., Mohammed, B., & Hussain, S., Lokman, M., & Naail, M. (2015). Validity of teacher-made assessment: A table of specification approach. Asian Social Science, 11(5), 193. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n5p193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lou, Y., Blanchard, P., & Kennedy, E. (2015). Development and validation of a science inquiry skills assessment. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.5408/14-028.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lowmaster, S. E. (2023). Clinical applications: Validity considerations in the test selection process. Journal of Personality Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2023.2191279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Makieiev, S. (2023). The formation of natural science competency concept based on PISA international research. Вісник Луганського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка, 1(355), 9-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2023-1(355)-9-19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Michael, D. (2017). Table of specifications. in an encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1255-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Munkh-Erdene, Y., Enkhlut, C., Bulgamaa, B., & Burmaa, B. (2022). Measuring the knowledge about science in students’ learning achievement. Mongolian Journal of Physics, 31(536), Article 341. https://doi.org/10.22353/physics.v31i536.341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Putri, I., & Azra, A. (2023). Description of students learning difficulties in the atomic structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00135E [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Enderle, P. (2016). The role of scientific practices in the development of students’ understanding of chemical bonding and hybridization: A case study of a high school chemistry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1137152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Smith, W., & Holloway, J. (2020). School testing culture and teacher satisfaction. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32, 461 -479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09342-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Green Synthesis of Cobalt Oxide/Gold (Coo/Au) Bimetallic Nanoparticles Using Sinapinic Acid: A Comprehensive Study
• Advances in Solar Cell Technologies: A Comprehensive Review of Material Synthesis, Structural Properties, Efficiency and Diverse Applications
• Thermal Decomposition of Co-Fe-Cr-Citrate Complex Via Structural and Spectral Study
• Surface Activity and Thermodynamic Assessment of Surfactants Derived from Oreochromis Niloticus Oil (Nile Tilapia Fish)
• Green Synthesis of Robust Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Sustainable Approach for Advanced Applications