Challenges Faced by Mathematics Teachers Under the Matatag Curriculum and Their Impact on Teaching Performance and Student Academic Outcomes: A PRISMA Systematic Review

This systematic review examined the challenges faced by Mathematics teachers under the MATATAG curriculum and the documented effects on teaching performance and student academic outcomes in Philippine basic education (2020–2025). Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched peer-reviewed journals and reputable sources (e.g., DepEd policy repositories, local academic outlets, and indexed databases) for empirical and policy-relevant studies on: (a) MATATAG implementation or closely aligned national mathematics reforms; (b) teacher-level constraints, including time and pacing, instructional resources, administrative workload, assessment practices, and professional development; and (c) outcomes, such as teaching performance indicators and student mathematics achievement.
A total of 140 records were identified (databases = 120; other sources = 20). After removing 30 duplicates, 110 records were screened, 26 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 14 studies were included in the final analysis. Convergent evidence highlights four persistent constraints: (1) compressed instructional time and pacing pressures (45-minute periods) limiting problem-solving depth and formative assessment cycles; (2) gaps in learning resources (contextualized materials, manipulative, and technology) hindering differentiated instruction; (3) administrative workloads (reporting and compliance) reducing time for planning and feedback; and (4) variable access to targeted professional development.
Studies linking these constraints to outcomes indicate (a) lower observation-rubric ratings where pacing and resources are inadequate, and (b) modest but consistent gains where supports exist, such as pacing guidance, lesson exemplars, formative assessment tools, and coaching. Comparative evidence suggests that public schools face more acute barriers than private schools. Overall, the weight of evidence supports system-level interventions—including refined pacing guidance, resource augmentation, and sustained content-focused professional development with coaching—to translate MATATAG objectives into higher-quality mathematics instruction and improved learner achievement. Future research should prioritize quasi-experimental and longitudinal designs that jointly track teacher performance and student mathematics outcomes under clearly specified support packages.

MATATAG curriculum; mathematics teaching; pacing and time-on-task; instructional resources; assessment practices; teacher performance; student achievement; Philippines

1. Department of Education. (2024, July 22). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum (DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/DO_s2024_010.pdf (Department of Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Department of Education. (2024, September 18). Amendment to DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024 (DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2024). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2024_012.pdf (Department of EducationDepartment of Education. (2024, May 24). Implementing guidelines on the school calendar and activities for SY 2024–2025 (DepEd Order No. 009, s. 2024). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/DO_s2024_009.pdf(Department of Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Department of Education. (2025, April 7). Amendment to DepEd Order No. 009, s. 2024 (DepEd Order No. 009, s. 2025). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2025/04/07/april-7-2025-do-009-s-2025-amendment-todeped-order-no-009-s-2024-implementing-guidelines-on-the-school-calendar-and-activities-for-theschool-year-2024-2025/(Department of Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Education. (2025, April 14). Multiyear implementing guidelines on the school calendar and activities (DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2025). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/DO_s2025_012.pdf(Department of Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Education. (2023, August 10). Pilot implementation of the revised K to 10 curriculum (MATATAG) (DepEd Memorandum No. 054, s. 2023). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2023/08/10/august-102023-dm-054-s-2023-pilot-implementation-of-the-revised-k-to-10-curriculum/ (Department of Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education. (2024, September 19). DepEd grants schools flexibility in MATATAG curriculum amid teacher and resource concerns. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/09/19/deped-grantsschools-flexibility-in-matatag-curriculum-amid-teacher-and-resource-concerns/ (Department of Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum: Mathematics—Curriculum Guide (Grades 1, 4, and 7). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/MATATAG-Mathematics-CG-Grades1-4-and-7.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Demate, D. R. B., Aclis, M. S., Catbagan, F. C. P., Molina, G. G., Ramos, N. U., & Patacsil, F. F. (2025). Teacher perspectives on MATATAG curriculum: Challenges and collaborative solutions. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8, e2025351. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Abaiz, B. J., Pido, M. R., &Sumile, M. J. (2025). Challenges encountered by Mathematics teachers in the implementation of MATATAG curriculum. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(1), 369–374. https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20250106185019_MGE-2025-1037.1.pdf (All Multidisciplinary Journal) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lobitaña, M. S. (2024). 45 minutes—that’s all you need: The FICS Model for Mathematics teachers. All Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(3), 259–263. https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/mr/article/view/5497/2469 (All Multidisciplinary Journal) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Baquirquir, J. A., Cabuenas, R., Cadungon, D., Velasquez, R. N., Villaruel, J. A., & Cabanilla, A., Jr. (2025). Lived experiences of teachers in the implementation of the National Mathematics Program in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(1), 363–368. https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20250106185019_MGE-2025-1037.1.pdf (All Multidisciplinary Journal) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Insorio, M., & Manalo, J. (2025). Effectiveness of the National Learning Camp in improving the mathematics performance of Grade 7 learners. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(1), 1–16. https://jrsmte.com/2025-volume-8-issue-1/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dulay, L. G. H. (2025). Improving numeracy skills using the RMA approach: A study of Grade 2 pupils at Binuan Elementary School. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(7), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i72155 (Asian Journal of Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. OECD. (2023, December 5). PISA 2022 results (Volume I & II) – Country note: Philippines. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-countrynotes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html (OECD) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en (OECD) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. OECD. (2024, June 18). PISA 2022 results (Volume III) – Factsheet: Philippines. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-results-2022-volume-iii-factsheets_041a90f1en/philippines_68d369a7-en.html (OECD) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I & II) – Philippines country note (PDF). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/11/pisa-2022-resultsvolume-i-and-ii-country-notes_2fca04b9/philippines_dbf92b65/a0882a2d-en.pdf (OECD) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Department of Education. (2024, December 31). FY 2024 Q4 BAR-1: Budget and performance report (as of Dec 31, 2024). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/FY-2024-Q4-BAR-1_As-of-Dec31-2024_Signed.pdf(Department of Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Department of Education. (2025, March 31). FY 2024 Q4 BAR-1 (updated as of March 31, 2025): Additional allocation for MATATAG curriculum training. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/Resubmission_FY2024-Q4-BAR-1_updated-as-of-March-31-2025-1-1.pdf (Department of Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar