The Impact of Kenya’s Aviation Diplomacy on Multilateral Trade Relations in the Eastern Africa Region
Authors
Department of Security, Diplomacy and Peace Studies, Kenyatta University (Kenya)
Department of Security, Diplomacy and Peace Studies, Kenyatta University (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100021
Subject Category: International Relations
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 228-239
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-28
Accepted: 2026-01-02
Published: 2026-01-19
Abstract
This study examined the impact of Kenya’s aviation diplomacy on its multilateral trade relations in the Eastern Africa region was evaluated. This study was anchored on two complementary theories namely; realism and neo-liberal institutionalism. Realist theory explains aviation diplomacy and multilateral trade relations in the East African Community (EAC) by emphasizing state-centered interests, power competition, and sovereignty. Neo-liberal institutionalism theory emphasizes the role of international institutions, norms, and cooperation in fostering peaceful and mutually beneficial relations among states within the EAC, even in an anarchic international system. This study took the form of an exploratory research design. Both secondary and primary sources of data collection were employed by this study. This study relied on simple probability and purposive sampling techniques to select a total of 140 respondents for field interviews. Simple probability sampling was used to select 50 respondents working in the aviation sector and 50 business persons operating in the Eastern African region. Purposive sampling was used to select 10 officers of the Ministry of Transport involved in aviation policy making in Kenya, 10 officers of the Ministry of Trade and Commerce, 10 officials of the EAC and 10 Commercial Attaches in the Embassies of EAC member countries. The instruments of data collection included structured questionnaires and interview guides. Data collected was analyzed and interpreted both quantitatively and qualitatively. The study noted that EAC member states’ aviation policies are shaped by political, strategic, and economic interests, with influences from political regimes, economic power, and commercial goals. The study observed that air transport liberalization in the EAC lowers fares, improves services, boosts trade, and creates jobs by enhancing connectivity and economic freedom. Kenya’s aviation diplomacy has supported regional trade growth, but protectionist policies have had negative effects.
Keywords
Aviation Policy, Aviation Diplomacy, Multilateral Trade Relations
Downloads
References
1. Abate, M. (2016). Economic effects of air transport market liberalization in Africa. Journal of Air Transport Management, 53, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abate, M., & Kincaid, I. (2018). Air transport liberalization and economic development in Africa. Transport Policy, 69, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ahmed, S. (2020). Foreign policy and economic interdependence in Africa. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 14(3), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bilkay, A., & Kemal, Y. (2017). Airlines as instruments of soft power: The case of Turkish Airlines. Journal of International Relations and Diplomacy, 5(2), 89–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bull, H. (2021). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Burghouwt, G., & De Wit, J. (2015). Airline network development and deregulation in Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 43, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Carr, E. H. (1946). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919–1939. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Caves, R. E., Christensen, L. R., & Tretheway, M. W. (2022). Economies of density versus economies of scale: Why trunk and local service airline costs differ. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4), 471–489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Cornago, N. (2022). Plural diplomacy: Actors and practices in global governance. International Studies Review, 24(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Dobson, A. (2017). Aviation regimes and the challenge of liberalization. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(6), 845–862. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dobson, A. (2022). The European single aviation market and external aviation relations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(2), 387–403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Dunne, T. (2005). Liberalism. In J. Baylis & S. Smith (Eds.), The globalization of world politics (3rd ed., pp. 185–203). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. East African Community (EAC). (2021). The economic impact of air transport liberalization in East Africa. EAC Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gaudry, M., & Mayes, R. (2021). Liberalization and airline competition in Europe. Transportation Research Part A, 144, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gidwitz, J. (2010). Aviation diplomacy and the political economy of air transport. International Journal of Aviation Management, 1(2), 123–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Habib, A., & Selinyane, N. (2018). Constraints on African foreign policy autonomy. South African Journal of International Affairs, 25(3), 329–346. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hall, J. C., & Lawson, R. A. (2013). Economic freedom and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Harbison, D. (2021). Regional aviation integration: Lessons from Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Air Transport Management, 92, 102040. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hedlung, S. (2022). Bilateral air service agreements and state sovereignty. Air and Space Law, 47(3), 215–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Hocking, B. (2006). Multistakeholder diplomacy: Forms, functions, and frustrations. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9(1), 1–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Hornby, J. (2019). Domestic politics and foreign policy decision-making. Foreign Policy Analysis, 15(4), 512–528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Johnson, D. (2011). International aviation law and policy. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Jonsson, C. (2011). Interdependence and aviation diplomacy. International Organization, 65(4), 595–618. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Kagwanja, P. (1995). Regional integration and sovereignty in East Africa. Africa Development, 20(4), 35–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Kasper, W. (2020). Open skies and emerging market airlines. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 54(2), 173–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown and Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Kraśnicka, T. (2021). Evolution of international air transport regulation. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 86(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Lentner, H. (2015). Sovereignty and regional integration in Africa. African Affairs, 114(456), 543–562. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Lumbroso, D. (2019). Aviation liberalization and economic development. World Economy, 42(9), 2603–2622. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Milton, J. (2021). Regional air transport agreements and economic integration. Transport Reviews, 41(5), 587–606. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Alfred A. Knopf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Morgenthau, H. J. (2021). Politics among nations (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Muller, H. (2017). Foreign policy analysis: Institutions and decision-making. International Studies Perspectives, 18(2), 201–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Omolo, K. (2020). National security and foreign policy in Kenya. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 14(4), 645–662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Piermartini, R., & Rousová, L. (2013). Liberalization of air transport services and economic growth. World Trade Review, 12(1), 59–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Raguraman, K. (2021). National airlines and nation branding in Southeast Asia. Tourism Geographies, 23(3), 523–542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Rhoades, D. (2008). Evolution of international aviation: Phoenix rising. Ashgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Sochor, E. (2021). ICAO as a political actor in global aviation governance. Journal of Transport History, 42(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Spies, Y. (2018). African aviation liberalization and the Yamoussoukro Decision. African Security Review, 27(3), 241–257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Von den Steinen, G. (2016). Economic liberalization versus sovereignty in aviation policy. Journal of International Political Economy, 23(4), 663–687. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Walala, M., & Mutinda, D. (2021). Aviation and economic development in Kenya. Journal of African Transport Studies, 5(2), 87–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Wang, Y., & Heinonen, J. (2015). Economic freedom and air transport development. Transport Policy, 41, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- China in South Asia and South America: Connections, Intersections and Similarities
- Prospects and Impediments to China-Africa Sports Cooperation in the Contemporary Era
- Decolonising International Relations: African Perspectives on Global Justice - The Case of the Gambia in the International Court of Justice.
- Climate - Induced Displacement and its Implications on Human Security: A Case Study of Ghana
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) in Promoting and Protecting Local Industries in West Africa (2015 – 2024)