Third-Person Interference in Marriage in Malaysia: A Socio-Legal Review
Authors
Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-01
Accepted: 2026-01-07
Published: 2026-01-21
Abstract
Marriage constitutes a fundamental social institution that underpins family formation, social stability, and societal well-being. However, third-person interference in marriage remains a persistent social issue that frequently contributes to marital conflict, breakdown, and divorce, resulting in complex social and legal implications. This study examines third-person interference in marriage from both social and legal perspectives within the Malaysian context, with particular emphasis on moral values, legal regulation, and enforcement challenges. This research adopts a mixed-methods approach, integrating qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Qualitative data were obtained through doctrinal legal analysis, literature review, and document analysis of statutory provisions, judicial decisions, and academic writings to establish the relevant legal and theoretical framework. Quantitative data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed to respondents from diverse backgrounds, including academics, legal practitioners, and members of the public. The findings indicate that, from a social perspective, third-party interference particularly through adultery and extramarital relationships is widely regarded as contrary to the moral, cultural, and religious values upheld by Malaysian society. Such conduct is perceived to undermine marital trust, family harmony, and social order. From a legal standpoint, although the criminal offence of third-party interference under Malaysian civil law has been abolished following a Federal Court decision, civil remedies based on tortious claims remain available to aggrieved spouses. In contrast, Syariah law continues to recognise third-party interference as a criminal offence applicable to Muslims. Nevertheless, enforcement under the Syariah legal framework faces significant challenges, particularly due to limitations in the admissibility of digital evidence and jurisdictional constraints arising from state-based authority. This study recommends the introduction of new statutory provisions under the Penal Code to address third-party interference in marriage within the Civil Courts in a gender-neutral manner, alongside the strengthening of Syariah legal provisions to enhance enforcement effectiveness and to safeguard the family institution in Malaysia.
Keywords
Third-Party Interference, Marriage
Downloads
References
1. Abu Hasan Mohd Sham. (2011). Peraturan dan Hukum Kanun Pahang dan Zaman Melaka hingga ke Zaman Pemerintahan Sultan Abdul Ghaffar Mahyuddin Shah dlm. Zainuddin Hj. Jumaat (pnyt.), Pahang Meniti Zaman. Kuantan: Persatuan Sejarah Pahang. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abu Zahrah. (1997). Al-Jarimah wa Al- ‘Uqubah Fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islami. Kaherah: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Al-Dusuki. (1929). Hasyiah Al-Dusuki ‘Ala Al-Syarh Al-Kabir. Kaherah: Maktabah Al-Azhariyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Al-Maraghi. (1945). Tafsir Al-Maraghi. Kaherah: Maktabah Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Al-Nawawi. (1955). Sahih Muslim bi Sharh Al-Nawawi. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ Al-Kutub Al- ‘Arabiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Al-Nawawi. (2001). Al-Majmu’ Syarh Al-Muhazzab. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ Turath Al-‘Arabi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Al-Quran al-Karim. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Al-Zabla’ei. (2010). Tabyiin Al-Haqaiq Sharh Kanz Al-Daqa'iq. Mesir: Matba’ah Bulak. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Avvyat Anantya & Mirna Nur Alia Abdullah. (2024). Perceraian Di Era Digital: Kasus Perselingkuhan Menjadi Tren Di Media Sosial Dan Dampaknya. Jurnal Sosiologi, Antropologi, dan Budaya Nusantara, 3(2), 100-107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Azman Mohd Noor. (2010). Stoning for Adultery in Christianity and Islam and its Implementation in Contemporary Muslim Societies. Intellectual Discourse, 18(1), 97-113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Criminal Procedure Act. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ibn Al-Humam. (1970). Syarh Fath Al-Qadir. Kaherah: Mustafa Al-Babi Al-Halabi, Kaherah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ibn Kathir. (1997). Tafsir Al-Quran Al-Azim. Arab Saudi: Dar Tayyibah Lil Nash Wa Tauzi’. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ibn Qudamah. (1984). Al-Mughni. Mesir: Dar Al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Lai Hen Beng v Perlembagaan Persekutuan [2024] 1 CLJ 681. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mahmood Saedon A. Othman et al. (1988) Kearah Islamisasi Undang-undang di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Yayasan Dakwah Islamiah Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Malaysian Penal Code. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mariyam Salim. (2005). Undang-undang Kedah Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Rogayah Estar Mohamad, Elmi Baharuddin, Noorazean Binti Razali, Nurul Ashiqin Jaafar & Nur Filzahruz Mohamad. (2021). Sah, Punca Penceraian Pasangan Dewasa Islam: Perspektif Badan Pelaksana, Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 26(2), 368-380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Roslina Che Soh @ Yusof, Nora Abdul Hak, Noraini Mohd Hashim &Muhammad Helmi Md. Said. (2021). Repercussions of Marital Infidelity In Malaysia: A Legal Response. Iium Law Journal, 29 (S1), 91-109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Saifuddin , S. ., Mat Rashid, A. ., Bahori, A. ., & Yahya, M. A. . (2021). Peranan Undang-Undang Syariah di Malaysia Dalam Melindungi Hak Kanak-Kanak Berdasarkan Maqasid Al-Shari’ah: The Role of Syariah Law of Malaysia In Protecting The Children’s Rights Based on Maqasid Al-Shari’ah. Journal of Muwafaqat, 4(1), 93–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Saifuddin, S. ., Mohd Zahir, M. Z. ., Hashim, F. Y. ., Pg Musa, P. I. ., & Jamil, A. . (2025). Challenges in the Enforcement of Syariah Criminal Law on Social Media in Malaysia: A Review from the Perspective of Syariah Evidence Law. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 145(1), 42–54. https://akademiabaru.com/submit/index.php/ard/article/view/6782. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Saifuddin, S., & Ali Tajuddin, H. H. (2024). APPLICATION SHIFTING THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN SYARIAH CRIMINAL CASES UNDER THE SYARIAH COURT EVIDENCE ENACTMENT IN MALAYSIA. Journal of Shariah Law Research, 9(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.22452/jslr.vol9no1.2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Saifuddin, S., Ali Tajuddin, H. H., Yahya, M. A., Abd Rahman, M. R., & Hashim, F. Y. (2024). Examining The Application of Standard of Proof in Criminal Cases: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Law and Common Law in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no1.491. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Shafiqah Iqlimah. (2020). Polimik Perceraian di Malaysia. Perspektif. Jabatan Kajian Politik Nasional &Antarabangsa, Terengganu Strategic & Integrity Institute (TSIS). https://www.tsis.my/wpcontent/uploads/2020/06/Polemik-Perceraian-di-Malaysia.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Suhaizad Saifuddin & Bernard Noel Beneldus. (2025). Perbuatan menggoda pasangan yang berkahwin: Pertimbangan undang-undang dan moral selepas pemansuhan Seksyen 498 Kanun Keseksaan. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 37(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.37052/kanun.37(1)no6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Suhaizad, S., Hashim, F. Y., Mohd Zahir, M. Z., & Ab Halim, A. H. (2025). Enforcement of Sharia criminal offences in cyberspace: Challenges from Malaysian legal perspective. Prophetic Law Review, 7(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss1.art2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Syed Naquib al-Attas. (1969). Preliminary Statement on a General Theory of the Islamization of the Malay-Indonesian Archipelago. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Syed Qutb. (1972). Fi Zilal Al-Quran. Lubnan: Dar Syuruk. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Yusuf al-Qardawi. (1960). Al-Halal wa Haram fi Islam. Kaherah: Maktabah Wahbah Lil Tabaah wa AlNashr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
- Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
- The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
- An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
- The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.