Linguistic Strategies in Investment Fraud: A Case Study of Language Structuring in Cryptocurrency Investment Website

In the era of digital finance, cryptocurrency investment fraud has become increasingly prevalent and has significantly affected societal well-being. Although various cybersecurity systems and legal frameworks have been established, there is still a lack of studies examining how language is strategically used to deceive victims. Cryptocurrency investment fraud in Malaysia has grown alongside increasing public interest in digital assets. This phenomenon displays consistent linguistic and semiotic patterns that construct false credibility, normalise risk, and prompt immediate action through the “compression” of space–time–value, as described in the proximisation framework. This study analyses fraudulent landing pages and fake support channels using a multimodal discourse approach to identify strategies used to manipulate victims. In addition to contextualising fraudulent discourse, the study incorporates developments in blockchain-based detection science and social media analytics to develop data-driven educational, policy, and enforcement implications, including dynamic early-warning systems, blockchain-based federated learning, and transparent transaction forensics. The findings are expected to contribute to public literacy, the design of preventive interventions, and more effective legal action against cryptocurrency fraud.

cryptocurrency investment, critical discourse analysis, SDG 16, SDG 4, language manipulation

1. Acharya, B., Saad, M., Cinà, A. E., Schönherr, L., Nguyen, H. D., Oest, A., Vadrevu, P., & Holz, T. (2024). Conning the Crypto Conman: End-to-End Analysis of Cryptocurrency-based Technical Support Scams. 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy SP, 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP54263.2024.00156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almahendra, R., Viyani, A. O., & Nabawi, M. (2024). Is crypto legitimate? Study on the relationship between legitimacy and public engagement on crypto market in Indonesia. Intangible Capital. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barnett, M., Vleet, S. V., Griffin, R., Fontanese, M., Mallender, W., Boynton, H., & Coldiron, A. (2024). Vesta: a groundbreaking tool for enhancing financial literacy and scam resilience among older adults. Innovation in Aging, 8, 1108-1108. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.3559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bartoletti, M., Lande, S., Loddo, A., Pompianu, L., & Serusi, S. (2021). Cryptocurrency Scams: Analysis and Perspectives. IEEE Access, 9, 148353-148373. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3123894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cong, L. W., Harvey, C. R., Rabetti, D., & Wu, Z. (2025). An Anatomy of Crypto-Enabled Cybercrimes. Management Science, 71, 3622-3633. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03691 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Keere, K. D., Trans, M., & Milan, S. (2025). The value of crypto? Sociotechnical imaginaries on cryptocurrency in YouTube content. Socio-Economic Review, 23(2), 759-785. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwae081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Li, X., Yepuri, A., & Nikiforakis, N. (2023). Double and Nothing: Understanding and Detecting Cryptocurrency Giveaway Scams. Proceedings of 2023 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2023.24584 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mohammed, D., Asokan, K., & Arunasalam, K. (2023). Anti-fraud measures and corporate policies to combat financial fraud in the financial institutes of Malaysia. E3s Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338909028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mohammed, D., Asokan, K., & Arunasalam, K. (2023). Anti-fraud measures and corporate policies to combat financial fraud in the financial institutes of Malaysia. E3s Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338909028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Phillips, R. C., & Wilder, H. (2020). Tracing Cryptocurrency Scams: Clustering Replicated Advance-Fee and Phishing Websites. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency ICBC, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBC48266.2020.9169433 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rey‐Ares, L., Fernández‐López, S., & Álvarez-Espiño, M. (2024). The role of financial literacy in consumer financial fraud exposure (via email) and victimisation: evidence from Spain. International Journal of Bank Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-03-2023-0169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ridho, W. F. (2023). Unmasking online fake job group financial scams: a thematic examination of victim exploitation from perspective of financial behavior. Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-05-2023-0124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Wang, D., & Zou, T. (2024). Financial literacy, Cognitive bias, And personal investment decisions: A new perspective in behavioral finance. Environment and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ye, H., & Chen, K. (2022). A study on the discourse strategy of telecommunication fraud based on proximization theory. Discourse and Communication, 17, 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221129517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar