Assessment of Accounting Methods Practiced by Malaysian Public Listed Companies in Agriculture Sector
Authors
University Malaysia Terengganu, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)
University Malaysia Terengganu, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100083
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 1056-1066
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-30
Accepted: 2026-01-06
Published: 2026-01-22
Abstract
This paper examines the existing accounting methods practiced by Malaysian public listed companies in agricultural sector in relation to palm oil trees, which falls under biological assets. The results based on the interview of six palm oil plantation companies indicate that the cost method is the most practiced method as compared to the fair value method. This is because the complexity of fair value raises problems to the company in measuring palm oil trees, and also gives impact to profit and loss account. Furthermore, fair value raises controversial issues particularly relating to palm oil trees where the income-producing biological assets have long economic lives that stretch beyond ordinary accounting periods. The fair value method was introduced by IAS 41 (Agriculture) as measurement method for biological assets. Since palm oil trees gives huge contribution to Malaysia’s economy, it is necessary to study this new proposed standard of agriculture before it is implemented in order to determine whether it would bring more advantages or disadvantages to Malaysian plantation companies as well as the Malaysia’s economy as a whole.
Keywords
IAS 41, Accounting Method, Fair Value, Cost Method, Long-lived Biological Assets
Downloads
References
1. Ajith Ratnayake. (2009). Valuing biological assets, (May), 36–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. AOSSG. (2011). Working Paper Issues Paper on IAS 41. Retrieved August 2011. http://www.aossg.org/docs/WG/Agriculture/Appendices_part_1_of_4_to_Issues_paper_on_IAS 41_Nov_2011.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Argilés, J.M., Slof, E.J., (2001). New opportunities for farm accounting”, European Accounting Review, 10(2), pp. 361-383. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Aryanto, Y. H. (2011). Theoretical Failure of IAS 41 : Agriculture. SSRN, 1–5. Retrieved from SSRN [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Barlev, B., Haddad, J.R., (2003). Fair value accounting and the management of the firm”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(4), pp. 383-415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Beria, S,. K. (2010). Agriculture Industry and IFRS : Application Review of IAS 41 –Agriculture (The Fair Value …). Journal of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India,58(May), 1783–1789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bohušová, H., Svoboda, P., & Nerudová, D. (2012). Biological assets reporting: Is the increase in value caused by the biological transformation revenue?.Agricultural Economics (ZemědělskáEkonomika), 58(11), 520-532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bonaci, C. G., Strouhal, J., & Mustata, R. V. (2012). Fair Value Measurement as a Challenge for the Accounting Standard Setting Process [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bosch, A,. J. M., Sabata, A., & García Blandón, J. (2011). A comparative study of difficulties in accounting preparation and judgement in agriculture using fair value and historical cost for biological assets. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Burritt, R. L., & Cummings, L. S. (2002). Accounting for biological assets-the experience of an Australian conservation company. Asian Review of Accounting, 10(2), 17-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Burnside, A., (2005). IAS 41 and the forest industry – A study of the forest products companies' perception of the IAS 41 today”, Bachelor Thesis, Department of Business Administration, Göteborg University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Chan, J. (2012). How is the Progress on IFRS convergence in Malaysia now: (Crowe Horwath) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Herranz, S. and Garcia-Osma, B. (2009). ‘Background and recent developments in fair value measurement: From FASB’s 1996 four decisions to the recent financial crisis.' Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, XXXVIII (144): 647-660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lazar, J., & Huang, C., C. (2008). Financial Reporting Standard of Malaysia. Asia: McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Li, G. and Yun, Y. (2013). Study on Measurement Attributes of Biological Assets in Chinese Agribusiness., Informatics and Management Science IV, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering Volume 207, pp. 323-328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Liang, P.J. and Wen, X. (2007) Accounting measurement basis, market mispricing, and firm investment efficiency, Journal of Accounting Research, 45(1), 155-197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Maina, P. N. (2010). Fair value reporting challenges facing small and medium-sized entities in the agricultural sector in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Malaysian Palm Oil Board. (2014). Fact Sheet Malaysian Palm Oil. Malaysia: National Library of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Marsh, T., & Fischer, M. (2013). Accounting for Agricultural Products: US Versus IFRS GAAP. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 11(2), 79-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nishikawa I. (2000): Comment Letter on Exposure Draft E65 – Agriculture No. 24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Rashad Rashad Abdel- Khalik‐Khalik, A. (2010). Fair Value Accounting and Stewardship*.Accounting Perspectives, 9(4), 253-269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Rayman, R.A. (2007). ‘Fair value accounting and the present value fallacy: the need for an alternative conceptual framework’. British Accounting Review, 39: 211-225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ronen, J. (2008) To fair value or not to fair value: a broader perspective, Abacus, 44(2), 181-208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Tan, L., T. (2010). Financial Accounting and Reporting in Malaysia. Vol. 2, (4th Edn). CCH: Wolter Kluwer Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria