Revisiting Veteran Recognition: The Vetting of Non‑Cadres and War Collaborators at Elangeni Centre, Bulawayo (April 2022)

This research examined the vetting of non cadres and war collaborators at Elangeni Centre in Bulawayo during the April 2022 exercise, focusing on how the process affected dignity, welfare, and psychosocial wellbeing, and proposing reforms to improve Zimbabwe’s compensation frameworks. The study aimed to document lived experiences of marginalized veterans, assess the ethical and emotional impacts of vetting, and recommend reforms. Guided by Transitional Justice Theory and Just War Theory (Jus in Bello and Jus post bellum), the research analyzed vetting as both an institutional mechanism and a moral obligation, emphasizing recognition, fairness, and dignity restoration. A qualitative explanatory design was adopted, situating the inquiry within interpretivism. Data were collected through key informant interviews with veterans, officials, and community leaders, complemented by document analysis of legislative texts, constitutional provisions, and reports such as the ZIPRA Veterans Trust Report (2022) and the ZANU PF Central Committee Report (2021). Using thematic analysis, transcripts and documents were coded around three objectives. The study found that vetting was experienced as humiliating, politicized, and procedurally opaque, with affiliation based questioning reopening old wounds, corruption undermining credibility, and lack of psychosocial support retraumatizing participants. Women and elderly veterans were particularly disadvantaged, while delays and irregularities eroded trust in institutions. Statutory frameworks disproportionately favored combatant cadres, leaving informal actors marginalized. Overall, the research concludes that Zimbabwe’s vetting process has failed to meet constitutional and ethical standards, reproducing exclusion and trauma rather than recognition and healing. It argues that reforms must embed standardized criteria, trauma informed support, community participation, and depoliticized oversight, aligning national practice with global transitional justice principles and ensuring that all contributors to the liberation struggle are recognized with dignity and fairness.

War collaborators, Vetting processes, Transitional justice, Compensation frameworks

1. Akol, J. (2021). Reintegration and transitional justice in South Sudan: Challenges of ethnicized politics. Journal of African Peace Studies, 12(3), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arthur, P. (2009). Transitional justice and peacebuilding: The ICC and beyond. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(2), 147–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Asamoah, J. (2020). Community hearings and transitional justice in Ghana. African Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20(1), 89–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chiponda, T., & Dana, L. (2022). Disrupted dignity and disjointed justice: Assessing the vetting of non cadres and war collaborators at Elangeni Centre, Bulawayo (April 2022). Unpublished manuscript. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chinyonga, T., & Kurebwa, J. (2023). Ethical clarity and psychosocial gaps in Zimbabwe’s vetting processes. Zimbabwe Journal of Social Sciences, 15(2), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clark, P. (2020). Rwanda’s justice after genocide: Survivor recognition and institutional reform. African Affairs, 119(476), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. de Greiff, P. (2006). Justice and reparations: The interdependence of transitional justice measures. In P. de Greiff (Ed.), The handbook of reparations (pp. 451–477). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. de Greiff, P. (2015). Transitional justice and development: Making connections. International Center for Transitional Justice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dower, J. (1999). Embracing defeat: Japan in the wake of World War II. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Duthie, R. (2019). Vetting and transitional justice: Principles and practices. International Center for Transitional Justice Policy Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Foner, E. (2014). Reconstruction: America’s unfinished revolution, 1863–1877. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ghai, Y. (2020). Judicial and police vetting in Kenya: Transparency and accountability in practice. East African Law Journal, 26(2), 55–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gready, P., & Robins, S. (2014). From transitional to transformative justice: A new agenda for practice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(3), 339–361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hayner, P. (2011). Unspeakable truths: Transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Herald News. (2022, April 23). Over 205,000 register for vetting at Elangeni Centre. The Herald. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hove, M. (2014). War veterans and the politics of recognition in Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies, 40(5), 1001–1018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lambourne, W. (2019). Localizing transitional justice: Trauma informed and community led approaches. Peacebuilding, 7(2), 123–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lundy, P., & McGovern, M. (2015). Security sector reform and transitional justice in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 9(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mayer, F. (2017). Vetting: The way to prevent recurrence? Lessons from Germany. European Review of History, 24(3), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mayer Rieckh, A., & de Greiff, P. (2007). Justice as prevention: Vetting public employees in transitional societies. Social Science Research Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mobekk, E. (2019). DDR and vetting in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Exclusion and corruption. African Security Review, 28(1), 67–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nyathi, M. (2004). War veterans and compensation in Zimbabwe: Policy gaps and contestations. Zimbabwe Journal of Social Development, 12(2), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Orend, B. (2006). The morality of war. Broadview Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pham, P., Vinck, P., & Stover, E. (2019). Reintegration of former LRA abductees in Northern Uganda: Recognition and psychosocial wellbeing. Journal of Peace Research, 56(4), 456–470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Robins, S., & Gready, P. (2019). Transformative justice: A conceptual framework for practice. Human Rights Review, 20(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sadomba, W. (2011). War veterans in Zimbabwe’s revolution: Challenging neo colonialism and settler colonialism. James Currey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sawyer, A. (2019). Liberia’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Implementation challenges. African Affairs, 118(472), 89–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Scarnecchia, T. (2021). The National Peace and Reconciliation Commission and transitional justice in Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies, 47(6), 1123–1140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sesay, A. (2020). Truth commissions and non combatant recognition in Sierra Leone. Conflict Trends, 2020(1), 15–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Teitel, R. (2000). Transitional justice. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Teitel, R. (2014). Globalizing transitional justice: Contemporary essays. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2015). Rule of law tools for post conflict states: Vetting public employees. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Walzer, M. (1977). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wilson, R. (2021). The politics of truth and reconciliation in South Africa: Symbolic justice and psychosocial impacts. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. World Bank. (2011). Zimbabwe public sector reform and war veteran compensation. World Bank Policy Note. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. ZIPRA Veterans Trust. (2022). Report on the Elangeni vetting exercise. Bulawayo: ZIPRA Veterans Trust. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zhou, Y. (2020). Purges and recognition in post Mao China: Transparency and legitimacy. China Quarterly, 242, 567–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. ZANU PF Central Committee. (2021). Report on war collaborators and veterans in the Second Republic. Harare: ZANU PF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar