Evaluating the Influence of Ecosystem Conditions on Oil Palm Smallholder Productivity in Bakong and Marudi, Sarawak

This study examines how six key components of a conducive ecosystem influence the productivity of oil palm smallholders in Bakong and Marudi, Sarawak. The components analysed comprise safety, family labour, effective leadership, technology, environmental conditions, and collaborative networks. Although agricultural productivity has been widely studied, empirical evidence that systematically investigates the combined effects of these interconnected ecosystem elements on smallholder performance remains limited, particularly within the Malaysian palm oil sector. To address this research gap, the study provides a context-specific assessment of ecosystem-based productivity drivers in one of Sarawak’s major oil palm–producing regions. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey design was adopted, involving 345 randomly selected smallholders drawn from the Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) Miri Branch database. Data were gathered using a structured questionnaire and analysed through descriptive statistics and multiple regression techniques. The results indicate that all six ecosystem components exert a positive effect on smallholder productivity, with safety emerging as the most influential factor (30.55%). However, only safety, family labour, and effective leadership were found to be statistically significant predictors. These findings align with economic production theory and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, underscoring the role of both material resources and motivational factors in enhancing agricultural output. By integrating tangible and intangible ecosystem elements within a single analytical framework, this study offers novel insights and recommends that smallholder development initiatives adopt an ecosystem-based strategy that prioritises farm security, community empowerment, and appropriate technology utilisation. The outcomes hold important implications for policy development and the promotion of sustainable practices in the palm oil industry.

Agricultural productivity, Smallholder, Oil palm, Sustainable palm oil

1. Food and Agriculture Organization, “FAOSTAT Statistical Database,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Oil World, Oil World Annual Report 2024, ISTA Mielke GmbH, Hamburg, Germany, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. R. H. V. Corley and P. B. Tinker, The Oil Palm, 5th ed. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley Blackwell, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. K. Sundram, R. Sambanthamurthi, and Y. Tan, “Palm fruit chemistry and nutrition,” Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 355–362, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Y. Basiron, “Palm oil production through sustainable plantations,” European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 289–295, 2007, doi: 10.1002/ejlt.200600223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. World Bank, The World Bank Annual Report 2020, Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB), MPOB Annual Report 2023, Ministry of Plantation and Commodities, Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. A. Ahmad, M. A. Sulaiman, and N. H. Ismail, “Effects of soil type and management practices on oil palm yield in Sarawak,” Malaysian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 25, pp. 13–26, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. M. S. Rahman, A. Abdullah, and N. Ismail, “Determinants of oil palm smallholders’ productivity in Malaysia,” International Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 62–73, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. T. Lim and S. Tan, “Ecosystem-based approaches for sustainable oil palm productivity,” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 215–230, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. A. Khairuman, M. M. Arif, and S. A. Latif, “Institutional support and productivity of oil palm smallholders,” Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. H. Surbakti, R. Lubis, and M. R. Pane, “Socioeconomic factors affecting smallholder oil palm productivity,” Jurnal Sosiohumaniora, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. N. Abdul Samat, N. Harith, and A. Mohammed, “Local labour productivity among oil palm smallholders in Sarawak,” Borneo Journal of Resource Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 85–94, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. P. A. Samuelson and W. D. Nordhaus, Economics, 19th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. M. Musa, R. Ahmad, and N. S. Ibrahim, “Agricultural input access and smallholder productivity,” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 2315–2332, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. A. H. Maslow, “A theory of human motivation,” Psychological Review, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 370–396, 1943. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. N. Ahmad, S. Ramli, and M. K. Abdullah, “Motivational factors in oil palm farming,” Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 205–215, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. N. Jalil and R. Ramli, “Community support and agricultural sustainability,” Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 65, pp. 1–11, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. N. Myzabella, A. Azman, and M. Yusof, “Ecosystem factors in agricultural productivity,” Journal of Development Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 55–72, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. I. Ibrahim, M. H. Shamsudin, and A. A. Ali, “Agricultural leadership and smallholder empowerment,” Malaysian Journal of Agricultural Extension, vol. 24, pp. 33–45, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. W. Ishak, H. Ali, and R. Kamaruddin, “Technology adoption in Malaysian agriculture,” Journal of Technology Management, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15–29, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Norshahzura, “Environmental compliance in the palm oil industry,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 88–99, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. M. Firdaus, R. Rahim, and S. A. Latif, “Benefits of MSPO certification for smallholders,” Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. J. Khan, H. Ibrahim, and A. Rahman, “Occupational safety in the oil palm sector,” Malaysian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. G. Yukl, Leadership in Organizations, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. S. Saad, M. N. Abdullah, and R. Razali, “Leadership styles and farm performance,” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1531–1547, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ketut and Sriyoto, “Family labour contribution to oil palm production,” Journal of Rural Development, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Fisher, “Technology definitions and concepts,” in Technology and Society, New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 1975. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Che Wan and Osman, “Technology adoption in agriculture,” Malaysian Technology Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Martono, Technology and Innovation Management, Jakarta, Indonesia: Prenada Media, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. S. Sazali, R. Raduan, and S. Suzana, “Technology components and productivity,” Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. R. A. Aziz, Agricultural Technology in Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 1986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. M. Iskandar, “Sustainable palm oil cultivation practices in Malaysia,” Oil Palm Bulletin, vol. 78, pp. 15–22, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. E. Er, N. Abdullah, and M. H. Ismail, “Oil palm cultivation and ecosystem impacts,” Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 45–56, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Aki, L. Hassan, and R. Salleh, “Development and environmental sustainability,” Asian Journal of Environment and Development, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. S. Suarno and M. Miswan, “Collaborative networks in agriculture,” Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. A. W. Akmal, M. N. Rahim, and H. S. Abdullah, “Workplace safety and productivity in the oil palm industry,” Journal of Occupational Health, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 123–131, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. S. Bahari, “Occupational health issues in oil palm plantations,” Malaysian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–64, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kourniotis, D. Papadopoulos, and S. Hadjidakis, “Machinery safety and accident prevention,” Safety Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. J. Musnadi, H. Idris, and M. Abdullah, “Safety challenges in remote agricultural areas,” Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. S. Rahman, “Risks and hazards in palm oil cultivation,” Malaysian Journal of Agricultural Safety, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. M. Mokhtar, N. Ismail, and H. Salleh, “Injury risks in the oil palm sector,” Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 765–774, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. N. Sukadarin, N. A. Mohd, and M. H. Shamsudin, “Occupational injuries among oil palm workers,” Industrial Health, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 490–498, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods for Business, 8th ed. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 607–610, 1970. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. G. D. Israel and I. Hay, Social Research Ethics: Guidelines for Research Professionals, London, U.K.: Routledge, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. F. Capra and P. L. Luisi, The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. J. Pretty, Sustainable Agriculture and Food, London, U.K.: Earthscan, 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. M. A. Altieri, Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press, 1995. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. G. Gliessman, Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. R. Meinzen-Dick, M. Di Gregorio, and N. McCarthy, “Methods for studying collective action in rural development,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 71, no. 1–2, pp. 5–31, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. A. Agrawal, “Common resources and institutional sustainability,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 132–139, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. J. Pretty, “Social capital and sustainable agriculture,” World Development, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1919–1941, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. N. Uphoff, “Community-based resource management,” Journal of Development Studies, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 27–58, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. G. Feder, R. Just, and D. Zilberman, “Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 255–298, 1985. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. M. Kassie, H. Shiferaw, and G. Muricho, “Productivity and technology adoption in agriculture,” Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 799–822, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. R. Roslan, A. Shamsuddin, and M. Ahmad, “Climate variability and oil palm yields,” Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 471–482, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. E. Kebede and M. Muchie, “The impact of perceived security on agricultural investment,” African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 434–445, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. A. Quisumbing, R. Meinzen-Dick, and L. Bassett, “Property rights and investment incentives,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 45–72, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. C. Doss, “Understanding farm-level decision making in agriculture,” World Development, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2075–2092, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. F. Ellis, Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries, Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. H. Hashim, M. Rahman, and N. Abdullah, “Labour resilience in smallholder oil palm farming,” Journal of Agribusiness Management, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 33–49, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. M. Kassie, J. Pender, and B. Yesuf, “Impacts of technology adoption on productivity and poverty in rural Ethiopia,” Agricultural Economics, vol. 44, no. 4–5, pp. 495–505, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. D. J. Pannell et al., “Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders,” Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1407–1424, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. M. A. Altieri and C. I. Nicholls, Agroecology: Theory and Practice for a Sustainable Agriculture, Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press, 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. P. Tittonell, “Ecological intensification of agriculture,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 130, pp. 1–6, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. T. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
• Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
• Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
• Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
• The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District