The Proficiency-Motivation Divide: Insights from a Senior High Chemistry Needs Assessment

A needs assessment serves as a critical strategic framework for informing pedagogical innovation and guiding curriculum development. In this context, the study evaluated the chemistry proficiency of Grade 11 learners across selected community high schools, identified their least mastered learning competencies and associated topic domains, assessed their motivation toward learning chemistry, and examined the relationship between proficiency and motivation. Results revealed a substantial gap in conceptual mastery: of the 371 participants, 238 learners (64.1%) were classified in the “needs improvement” category, while only 24 learners (6.5%) attained a “proficient” rating. These findings indicate that the majority of students experience pronounced difficulties in comprehending foundational chemistry principles, particularly in core areas such as scientific investigation, substances and mixtures, and differentiating elements from compounds. Moreover, complex and abstract domains, including the periodic table of elements, chemical bonding, chemical reactions, and quantitative processes such as the mole concept and gas laws, remain largely unmastered. Despite these challenges, learners exhibited noteworthy motivation, with 121 respondents (32.3%) reporting high motivation and only 4.0% indicating low motivation; notably, no students fell into the “very low” category. This pattern suggests that students retain a resilient intrinsic drive to engage with the subject matter even when confronted with cognitive challenges. Nevertheless, statistical analysis revealed no significant relationship between chemistry proficiency and motivation, implying that intrinsic drive alone is insufficient to surmount the inherent complexities of the chemistry curriculum. These findings underscore the necessity for targeted instructional interventions and scaffolded pedagogical strategies designed to bridge conceptual gaps and promote deeper understanding.

Chemistry Proficiency, Chemistry Motivation

1. Chi, C. (2023). Philippine Still Lags behind world in Math, Reading, and Science-PISA 2022. Philippine Star Global. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/06/2316732/philippines-still-lags-behindworld-math-reading-and-science-pisa-2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Wang et al., (2021). Prompts to Promote Success: Evaluating Utility Valuea and Growth Mindset Intervention on General Chemistry Students’ Attitude and Academic Performance. Journal of Chemical Education. Vol 98, Issue 5. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Tabamo, 2023. The Use of Literature in Teaching Science as a Strategy in Addressing Surface Learning. International Journal or Research Publication and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.4.723.46962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. HadjiAbas, & Marasigan. (2020). [As cited in Caballes et al., 2024]. Challenges of science laboratories in public secondary schools of Lanao del Sur. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Huda, N., & Rohaeti, E. (2023). The factors that influence the motivation to learn chemistry 1. of upper-secondary school students in Indonesia. Journal of Baltic Science Education. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.615 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Pratiwi, W. N., Rochintanawati, D., & Agustin, R. R. (2018). The effect of multiple intelligence-based learning towards students’ concept mastery and interest in learning matter. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012075 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ogodo, A. C., & Abosede, O. J. (2025). Sustainable Development Goals and Chemistry Education: Challenges and the Way Forward. Journal of Chemistry and Environment. https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed/article/download/674/pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Umanah, E., & Babayemi, J. (2024). Enhancing Students' Academic Achievement in Chemical Reactions Through Computer-Based Molecular Modelling and Hackathon Teaching Strategies. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/enhancing-students-academic-achievement-inchemical-reactions-through-computer-based-molecular-modelling-and-hackathon-teaching-strategies/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dacles, J. (2024). Learning Challenges and Coping Strategies in Chemistry Among STEM and Non-STEM [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Students: A Phenomenological Study. ASEAN Journal for Science Education. https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed/article/view/674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Han, X., & Hasan, M. (2024). Immersive and Experiential Learning: A Review of Project-based Learning and Virtual Reality in Chemistry Education. UNY Journal. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpms/article/download/85704/23890/247904 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bautista-Arpi, L., et al. (2024). Innovative strategies to strengthen teaching-researching skills in chemistry and biology education: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1363132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ojediran, I. A., Oludipe, D. I., & Ojewumi, A. E. (2020). Effects of laboratory-based instructional strategy on students’ attitudes and performance in Chemistry. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(2), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/11-2-18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sari, S., Widhiyanti, T., & Ridwan, A. (2022). Development of digital periodic table of elements to improve students' visualization skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2157(1), 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2157/1/012034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Villafañe, S. M., Garcia, C. A., & Lewis, J. E. (2021). Exploring the relationship between students' prior knowledge and their performance in a foundational Chemistry course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(1), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00155K [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mangubat, M. (2023). Factors Influencing Students' Academic Success in Introductory Chemistry: A Systematic Literature Review. MDPI Education Sciences. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/4/413 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Guzel, H. (2013). The relationship between student’s success in chemistry and their attitudes towards chemistry, motivation, and study skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 601–611. http://www.scientiaeduca.lt/files/pdf/jbse/2013/601-611.Guzel_JBSE_Vol.12.No.5.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Scherrer, V., & Preckel, F. (2019). Development of achievement motivation and self-concept: A joint analysis. Child Development, 90(6), e763–e777. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Green Synthesis of Cobalt Oxide/Gold (Coo/Au) Bimetallic Nanoparticles Using Sinapinic Acid: A Comprehensive Study
• Advances in Solar Cell Technologies: A Comprehensive Review of Material Synthesis, Structural Properties, Efficiency and Diverse Applications
• Thermal Decomposition of Co-Fe-Cr-Citrate Complex Via Structural and Spectral Study
• Surface Activity and Thermodynamic Assessment of Surfactants Derived from Oreochromis Niloticus Oil (Nile Tilapia Fish)
• Green Synthesis of Robust Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Sustainable Approach for Advanced Applications