Empowering School Leaders: Strategic Responses to Leadership Deficits in Basic Education
Authors
Teacher I, Hindang National High School (Philippines)
Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100147
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 1788-1801
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-11
Accepted: 2026-01-16
Published: 2026-01-27
Abstract
This study examines strategies to address leadership challenges in Philippine basic education, with particular attention to sustainability-oriented frameworks. Using Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) of official reports and scholarly literature, the paper identifies persistent issues such as weak instructional leadership, excessive managerial burdens, limited professional development, inadequate systemic support, and insufficient digital and crisis leadership capacities. Findings reveal that these deficits stem largely from inadequate training and fragile support structures within schools and educational institutions. To respond, the study highlights empowerment strategies grounded in sustainability principles, including evidence-based decision-making, collaborative and distributed leadership, digital competence, and supportive policy frameworks. International initiatives such as the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) provide valuable guidance for strengthening leadership capacity, particularly in advancing equity, resilience, and long-term educational reform by 2030.
Keywords
leadership capacity, empowerment strategies, Philippine basic education, sustainable development
Downloads
References
1. Alfiler, M. C., & Nicolas, R. (1997). Leadership studies in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 385–398. https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc-archives/Philippine%20Journal%20of%20Public%20Administration/1997/11_Leadership%20Studies%20in%20the%20Philippines.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Asian Development Bank. (2022). ASEAN education cooperation: An assessment of the education divide and measuring the potential impact of its elimination (Working Paper No. 1300). https://www.adb.org/publications/asean-education-cooperation-an-assessment-of-the-education-divide-and-measuring-the-potential-impact-of-its-elimination [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Azman, N., Sirat, M., Rahman, S. A., Ahmad, Y., & Komoo, I. (2024). Higher education leadership development in selected ASEAN countries: An exploratory study of challenges and prospects in public higher education institutions. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 54(7), 1137–1154. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1442041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Center for Creative Leadership. (2023). The leadership gap: How to fix what you lack. https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/leadership-gap-what-you-still-need/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Development Dimensions International. (2025). Global leadership forecast 2025. https://www.ddiworld.com/research/global-leadership-forecast-2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. EDCOM-II. (2024). Miseducation: The failed system of Philippine education (Year One Report). https://edcom2.gov.ph/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. EDCOM-II. (2025). Fixing the foundations: A matter of national survival (Year Two Report). https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2025/01/EDCOM-2-Year-2-Report-Fixing-the-Foundations-2025.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/461445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Jones, L. (2010). Still in the “driver’s seat,” but for how long? ASEAN’s capacity for leadership in East-Asian international relations. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(3), 95–113. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30696877.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Masalon, R. M., Masalon, R. M., & Masalon, R. M. (2022). School heads’ micropolitics abilities, shared leadership capacity building skills, and school performance. Global Scientific Journal, 10(12), 1–15. https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/School_Heads_Micro_Politics_Abilities_Shared_Leadership_Capacity_Building_Skills_and_School_Performance.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Owen, S. M., Toaiauea, T., Timee, T., Harding, T., & Taoaba, T. (2020). School leadership capacity-building: Developing country successful case studies. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(10), 1615–1636. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2019-0379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Rivas, E. (2025). [Title of the article/book]. [Publisher]. (Add full details if available) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. The GUIDON. (2025, May). A room for teachers: Reducing burdens, renewing capacity. https://theguidon.com/2025/05/a-room-for-teachers-reducing-burdens-renewing-capacity/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Uy, J. M., & Alo, J. A. (2025). Leadership capacity and school heads development program implementation in Davao Occidental. iJOINED Journal, 4(2), 668–678. https://etcor.org/storage/iJOINED/Vol.%20IV%282%29,%20668-678.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: Sustainable development goals (SDG 4) – Quality education. https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. UNESCO. (2021). ESD for 2030 Toolbox. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education/toolbox [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report summary, 2024/5: Leadership in education – Lead for learning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391758 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Wallace Foundation. (2023). Building leadership pipelines in education. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar