Gamification as a Pedagogical Approach to Strengthen Academic Performance and IMT Literacy in Empowerment Technologies for Senior High School TVL Learners

In the context of 21st-century learning, Information, Media, and Technology (IMT) literacy is critical for equipping students with the skills required for academic and workplace success. This quasi-experimental study investigated the effectiveness of a quest-based gamification strategy in improving the academic performance, hands-on ICT skills, and IMT literacy of Senior High School (SHS) students in the Technical-Vocational-Livelihood (TVL) strand. Two intact Grade 11 classes from a rural public high school in the Northern Mindanao, Philippines participated in the eight-week intervention: one receiving conventional instruction (control) and the other undergoing gamified lessons (experimental). Pre- and post-test measures were conducted using validated instruments on IMT skills, a teacher-made academic test, and a performance-based rubric. Descriptive statistics revealed higher mean scores across all constructs for the experimental group. Paired-samples t-tests showed statistically significant improvements within the experimental group, while independent-samples t-tests indicated significant differences favoring the experimental group in all post-test outcomes. These results suggest that the integration of gamification elements—such as narrative quests, performance rewards, and collaborative challenges—fostered greater student engagement and mastery of content. Anchored in the theory of gamified learning and aligned with the P21 Framework for 21st-century skills, this study affirms that gamification can be an effective pedagogical strategy to close skill gaps in digital literacy and enhance authentic learning outcomes. Recommendations include incorporating gamification in ICT curricula, conducting INSET training for teachers, and expanding future studies to include qualitative data and learners from other strands.

Engagement, Gamification, Pedagogy, Student Motivation

1. Beattie, M. (2022, June 9). Using Gamification to Motivate Gen Z. Retrieved from Alvaria Reach Out Right: https://www.alvaria.com/blog/using-gamification-to-motivate-gen-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are They Really Ready to Work? Employers' Perspectives on the Basic Knowledge and Applied Skills of New Entrants to the 21st Century U.S. Workforce. The Conference Board. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Climaco, J., & Mangarin, R. (2024). Exploring Contributing Factors on Poor Digital Literacy of Students: A Review of Existing Studies. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 9(9), 582-588. doi:10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.909051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cosmiano, C., & Namoco, S. O. (2024). Utilizing gamification to improve motivation and academic performance of technology and livelihood education students in a public school in cagayan de oro city. Master's Thesis. Cagayan de Oro City, Misamis Oriental, Philippines: University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Damayanti, W., Wijaya, N. Y., & Rasuki. (2025). Literature Review on Digital Literacy: Building Basic Competence Among Students in Developing Countries. Indonesian Journal of Education, 5(1), 216-224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DepEd. (2016). Curriculum Guide for Empowerment Technologies. K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SHS-Applied_Empowerment-Technologies-for-the-Strand.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. DepEd. (2016). Empowerment Technologies. K-12 Basic Education Curriculum Guide. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SHS-Applied_Empowerment-Technologies-for-the-Strand.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., nacke, L., Dixon, D., & O"Hara, K. (2011). Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vancouver, BC, Canada. doi:10.1145/1979742.1979575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Diaz, A. F., & Estoque-Loñez, H. (2024). A Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of Gamification on Student Learning Achievement. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(5), 1236-1253. doi:https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Duero, J. Q., & Namoco, S. O. (2024, May). Empowering 21st century skills: the effectiveness of the triadic approach to innovative teaching for bachelor of technology and livelihood. Dissertaion. Cagayan de Oro City, Misamis Oriental, Philippines: Uniersity of Science and Technology of SOuthern Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dulay, M. B., & Manuel, S. J. (2021). Emergency remote teaching experience: Challenges, actions and suggested measures of STEM research teachers in Pangasinan Philippines. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education and Management, 1(2), 150-161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Estillore, M. A., & Namoco, S. O. (2024). Development and acceptability evaluation of digital competency training module: a sequential explanatory mixed method for deped teachers. Doctoral Dissertation. Cagayan de Oro City, Misamis Oriental, Philippines: University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Estillore, MN, A., & Namoco, , S. O. (2024). Development and Acceptability Evaluation of Digital Competency Training Module for DepEd Teachers. Science International Lahore, 36(3), 313-321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Newbury Park: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gecobe, G. C., Gregorio, K. C., & Rogel, G. R. (2022, February). Mastery and achievement levels in empowerment technologies of grade 11 stem learners taught under blended learning modality. An Action Research. Nueva Viscaya, Philippines: Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babbin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Holt, R. (2024, August 20). How to Gen Z: Adapting Teaching Methods for the Learning Style of Digital Natives. Retrieved from Evidence in Motions University Partnerships: https://eimpartnerships.com/articles/gen-z-learning-style-how-to-adapt-teaching-methods-for-digital-natives [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Holzer, B. M., Ramuz, O., & Minder, C. E. (2022). Motivation and personality factors of Generation Z high school students aspiring to study human medicine. BMC Medical Education, 22(31). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03099-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. ICT in Education. (2023, March 22). Information and communication technology (ICT) in education. Retrieved from UNESCO: https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/improve-learning/information-and-communication-technology-ict-in-education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Javier, S. J., & Fajardo, F. (2017). The ICT and gamification: tools for improving motivation and learning at universities. 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances. Universitat Politecnica de Val ` encia, Val ` encia. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/HEAd17.2017.5286 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kapp, K. (2012). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction. Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer,. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kilaton, L., Esoy, J. E., tan, J. B., & Abeci, F. (n.d.). Integration of ICT in the Instructional Management of Senior High School in the Division of Valencia City, Region X, Philippines. SSRN. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4780928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lomibao, L., Roble, D., & Nob, J. O. (2024). Unveiling the Effects of Gamification on Math Learning: A Literature Review in the Philippine Context. Journal on Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 13-19. doi:10.12691/jitl-4-1-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mangarin, R. A., & Climaco, J. T. (2024). Exploring Contributing Factors on Poor Digital Literacy of Students: A Review of Existing Studies. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, IX(IX), 582-588. doi:https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.909051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Martin-Diaz, V., Riquelme, I., & Cabero-Almenara, J. (2020). Uses of ICT Tools from the Perspective of Chilean University Teachers. Sustainability, 12(15), 6134. doi:10.3390/su12156134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. McLeod, S. (2025, March 31). Constructivism Learning Theory & Philosophy of Education. Retrieved from Simply Psychology: https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Milutinović, V. (2022). Examining the influence of pre-service teachers’ digital native traits on their technology acceptance: A Serbian perspective. Educ Inf Technol, 27, 6483–6511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10887-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Otrel-Cass, K., Khoo, E., & Cowie, B. (2012). Scaffolding With and Through Videos: An Example of ICT-TPACK. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Journl, 12(4). Retrieved from https://citejournal.org/volume-12/issue-4-12/science/scaffolding-with-and-through-videos-an-example-of-ict-tpack [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Pagente, A., Crisologo, B., Doncillo, M. B., Leopoldo, N. R., & Doncillo, B. (2024). Gamifying Technology and Livelihood Education: Instructors' Lived Experiences with Technology Applications in Core Subject Teaching. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(11), 1079-1088. doi:10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8110087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 Framework Definitions. Eric. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519462.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Que, E. (2021). Sustaining Successful ICT Integration in Remote Rural Schools. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 29(3), 1487-1506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Quraishi, T., Ulusi, H., Muhid, A., Hakimi, M., & Olusi, M. (2024). Empowering Students Through Digital Literacy: A Case Study of Successful Integration in a Higher Education Curriculum. Journal of Digital Learning and Dsitace Education, 2(8), 667. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Reid, L., Button, D., & Brommeyer, M. (2023). Challenging the Myth of the Digital Native: A Narrative Review. Nursing Reports, 13(2), 573-300. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13020052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rubach, C., & Lazarides, R. (2021). Addressing 21st-century digital skills in schools – Development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers' basic ICT competence beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106636 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sambaan, R. M., & namoco, S. O. (2022). Assessment of Interactive Learning Objects for Carpentry among BTLED students in a state university in Cagayan de Oro City. Science International Lahore, 34(6), 557-561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Samortin, M. (2023, April 3). Effects of Gamified Learning Activities in Enhancing Junior High School Students’ English Vocabulary Retentio. Retrieved from Far eastern University: https://www.feu.edu.ph/asian-journal-on-perspectives-in-education/ajpe-volume-1-issue-1/effects-of-gamified-learning-activities-in-enhancing-junior-high-school-students-english-vocabulary-retention/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Schrum, L., Davis, N., Jacobsen, M., Lund, A., Odabasi, H. F., Voogt, J., & Way, J. (2015). A Global Perspective: Current Trends and Issues in ICT for 21st Century Education. AERA 2015 Conference Invited Panel for SIG TACTL, (pp. 1-22). Chicago, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., marques, L., de Miranda Coelho, J., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tan, K. M., & Namoco, S. O. (2024). Post-Pandemic Challenges and Coping Mechanisms of TLE and TVL DepEd Teachers: A Phenomenology Study. Science International Lahore, 36(6), 407-414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tan, S., Cheah, H., Chen, W., & Choy, D. (2017). Integrating ICT into K-12 Education – A Global Perspective. In Pushing the Frontier. Singapore: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4239-3_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tongol, , K. M., & Namoco, S. O. (2025). TLE Teachers and the MATATAG Curriculum: A Case Study in the Implementation Challenges and Adaptation. Science International Lahore, 37(3), 359-364. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Torres, R. O., & Ortega-dela Cruz, R. A. (2024). Facilitating Learning of Generation Z Learners towards Effective Remote English Language Learning. Theory of Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Villaseñor, R. M. (2024). Challenges and Dilemmas of Digitalization in Philippine Education: A Grassroots Perspective. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 14(2), 232-244. doi: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v14i2.22325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Why You Need Gamification as the Gen Z’s Enter the Workforce. (2024, June 17). Retrieved from Terranova Security: https://www.terranovasecurity.com/blog/gamification-gen-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Youssef, A. B., dahmani, M., & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide. Information, 13(3), 129. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S., Sujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar