Learners’ Perceptions of ChatGPT’s Interactive Features in Vocabulary Enhancement: A Systematic Literature Review

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into language education has significantly transformed vocabulary learning by promoting interactive, adaptive, and personalized learning experiences. Among the various AI-driven tools, ChatGPT has garnered increasing attention for its potential to enhance vocabulary acquisition in English as a Second Language (ESL) contexts. This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) synthesizes empirical studies that investigate learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT’s interactive features in vocabulary enhancement across primary, secondary, and tertiary educational settings. Overall, findings suggest that learners perceive ChatGPT as an engaging and motivating tool that facilitates vocabulary retention and active language use. However, recurring concerns are highlighted, including content repetitiveness, learner overreliance on AI-generated responses, and occasional inaccuracies. The review is framed within cognitive processing theories, specifically Bottom-Up, Top-Down, and Interactive approaches, to examine how learners process and engage with AI-mediated vocabulary input. Furthermore, it explores pedagogical frameworks for effectively integrating AI in ESL classrooms, with emphasis on accessibility, learner autonomy, and adaptive learning practices to support vocabulary enhancement.

Vocabulary acquisition plays a crucial role in ESL proficiency

1. Aldowsari, R., & Aljebreen, A. (2024). AI-assisted language learning: Implications for ESL vocabulary acquisition. Journal of ESL Technology, 17(2), 56–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Algraini, M. (2024). Multilingual AI adaptation in ESL instruction. Journal of Linguistic Computation, 18(2), 45–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Siyabi, R. (2024). Evaluating AI-driven vocabulary retention strategies for primary ESL students. Journal of Educational AI, 22(2), 76–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barabad, C., & Anwar, M. (2024). Speech processing models for AI-driven ESL fluency enhancement. Linguistic AI Journal, 14(1), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2021). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ho, W. (2024). Integrating contextualized AI storytelling in ESL classrooms. Applied Language Teaching Review, 31(2), 101–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Karataş, F., et al. (2024). Adaptive AI models in inclusive ESL education. International Journal of AI Pedagogy, 19(3), 89–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kim, H. (2023). The evolving role of AI in ESL instruction: Ethical considerations and pedagogical approaches. Language Education Review, 29(3), 112–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Klimova, B., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in second language learning: Challenges and opportunities. Applied Linguistics Journal, 32(1), 88–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Leow, R. P. (2020). Cognitive perspectives on second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning Research Journal, 25(4), 234–250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mugableh, A. (2024). Quantitative analysis of AI-driven vocabulary expansion among ESL learners. Computational Linguistics Journal, 15(4), 34–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nation, P. (2020). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pérez, M. J., & Turrero, J. (2023). AI-driven vocabulary learning: Comparative analysis of ESL proficiency outcomes. Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 28(2), 79–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Schmitt, N. (2022). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Selivanova, A., et al. (2023). Gamification in AI-driven ESL education: Engagement strategies and student motivation. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Skehan, P. (2019). Task-based language learning and vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics Review, 18(3), 211–229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tseng, W.-T., & Schmitt, N. (2022). Lexical learning in digital environments: AI-assisted vocabulary instruction. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 55–87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The enhancement of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wang, Y., & Lin, J. (2023). Personalized AI-enhanced ESL learning platforms: Vocabulary acquisition effectiveness in interactive models. Computational Language Education Journal, 19(3), 92–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zhang, M., & Liu, H. (2024). AI-assisted oral fluency enhancement: Innovations in ESL speech learning. Journal of AI Language Pedagogy, 16(4), 67–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar