Barangay Justice System Vis-À-Vis Dispute Resolution

This study aimed to explore the awareness, effectiveness, and challenges of the Barangay Justice System in Dapa, Surigao del Norte. Employing a sequential explanatory mixed-method design, the research involved 363 barangay officials and community members who participated in BJS proceedings. Key findings indicated high awareness among respondents regarding the BJS's importance, Lupon's constitution, dispute resolution processes, case coverage, and agreement execution. While both groups rated the BJS as very effective across conciliation, mediation, and arbitration, barangay officials perceived higher effectiveness in mediation and arbitration than dispute parties, though no significant difference was observed in conciliation. Further, the main challenges identified includes limited legal knowledge and training, perceived external influence, and weak enforcement power. Hence, this study recommends the conduct of mandatory legal and ethics training, institutional reforms, clearer guidelines, enhanced DILG support, and strengthened community education for sustaining the BJS as a reliable, fair, and community-based dispute resolution mechanism.

Barangay Justice System, Dispute Resolution, Awareness, Effectiveness, Conflict Mediation

1. Benter, M. (2020). The effectiveness of the barangay justice system in Hagonoy, Bulacan: A basis for improvement. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bulacan State University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brigg, M., Holmes, J., & Kaho, A. (2022). Making space for indigenous approaches to peacebuilding in the Southwest Pacific. Peacebuilding, 10(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1963129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brillantes, A. B., Jr., & Moscare, D. (2002). Decentralization and federalism in the Philippines: Lessons from global community. University of the Philippines Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cabanes, A. J. (2017). The traditional conflict resolution practices of the Higaunon people in San Luis, Malitbog, Bukidnon. Central Mindanao University Research Journal, 28(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. De Leon, M., & Ramos, G. (2020). Governance awareness and local participation: Understanding the dynamics of barangay institutions. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 99–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2021). Status report on the implementation of the Barangay Justice System (BJS). DILG Publication Division. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dofeliz, R. P., & De la Peña, J. R. (2022). Performance of Lupon members in selected barangays in Badiangan, Iloilo. Philippine Journal of Criminology and Public Order, 8(2), 76–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Folden, M. (2013). Community Justice Centers in Thailand: A model of informal justice. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(3), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9164-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Garcia, R. (2019). Barangay governance and justice delivery in the Philippines. Philippine Political Science Journal, 40(2), 129–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Garcia, R., & Mendoza, L. (2021). Civic legal awareness and youth participation in local justice systems. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 8(1), 54–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Golub, S. (2014). Justice initiatives: Legal empowerment and informal justice systems. Open Society Foundations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Goyal, M. (2022). Adivasi perceptions of justice: The interface of indigenous law and the Indian criminal justice system. Asian Journal of Legal Studies, 11(2), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Guia, M. J., Peñaranda, D. C., & Bautista, C. E. (2021). Legal literacy and the effectiveness of the Barangay Justice System. Philippine Journal of Criminology, 7(1), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kurniawan, A. (2022). Progressive law and the role of alternative dispute resolution in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Legal Studies, 9(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijls.v9i2.49501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lama, T. (2023). Community-based alternative dispute resolution and restorative justice: Comparative insights. Restorative Justice: An International Journal, 11(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2022.2145561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Latif, N. (2022). Kinship leaders and informal dispute resolution in Pakistan: Negotiating state and community boundaries. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 10(1), 115–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ligan, J. R., Torres, C. M., & Baccay, M. (2022). Public leadership, motivation, and professionalism among members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa. Mindanao Journal of Public Policy, 5(1), 22–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Marzuki, I., & Sijabat, R. (2018). Integrating adat values in Indonesia’s rural dispute resolution mechanisms. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 49(3), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463418000342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mengesha, T., Abebe, S., & Wondimu, G. (2015). Indigenous institutions of conflict resolution among the Kembata people in Ethiopia. African Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(2), 145–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Naseer, M., Khan, F., & Shah, Z. (2023). Evaluating Dispute Resolution Councils as informal justice mechanisms in Pakistan. International Journal of Restorative Justice, 6(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.5553/IJRJ/258908912023006001004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nnani, A. C., Okafor, J. C., & Okechukwu, C. P. (2023). Democracy, social justice, and peacebuilding in Nigeria. Journal of African Governance and Development, 12(2), 189–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pagandian, M., Ponce, R., & Santos, M. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of the Katarungang Pambarangay: Challenges and prospects. Philippine Journal of Local Governance, 5(1), 23–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Pimentel, A. (1991). The Barangay justice system: Administration of justice at the grassroots. Rex Book Store. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Salipada, J. A., Dimatingcal, H., & Tangkong, A. (2022). The effectiveness of the Bleye Kukum justice system in Maguindanao, Philippines. Journal of Peace and Indigenous Studies, 4(2), 77–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Santos, M., & Del Rosario, P. (2019). Community-based mediation in the Philippines: Effectiveness and limitations. Philippine Social Science Review, 71(3), 58–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sidiq, M., Marwan, A., & Yusuf, I. (2019). Harmonizing the ADR Act of 2004 and the Barangay Justice System in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2019.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Silverman, D. (2020). Qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Singapore Mediation Centre. (n.d.). About us. https://www.mediation.com.sg [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Supreme Court of the Philippines. (2020). Judicial annual report 2020. Supreme Court Public Information Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. United Nations Development Programme. (2015). Good governance framework: Principle and practices. UNDP Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. United Nations Development Programme. (2019). Informal justice systems: Charting a course for human rights-based engagement. UNDP Rule of Law Global Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Vecaldo, R. F., Agpaoa, M. A., & Limmong, D. (2015). The bodong system as a traditional peace pact mechanism among the Kalinga people. Cordillera Journal of Indigenous Studies, 3(1), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wall, J. A., & Dunne, T. (2012). Mediation in Asia-Pacific: Dynamics and effectiveness. Elsevier Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Welikala, A. (2016). Legal pluralism and mediation boards in Sri Lanka. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 51(8), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909614565764 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar