The Social Costs of People's Salt Industry Using the Polecy Analysis Matrix in Bima Regency

Authors

Rimawardah

Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram, Mataram (Indonesia)

Tajidan Tajidan

Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram, Mataram (Indonesia)

M. Yusuf

Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram, Mataram (Indonesia)

Nurtaji Wathoni

Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram, Mataram (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100187

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 2378-2389

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-12

Accepted: 2026-01-16

Published: 2026-01-29

Abstract

The research aims to: (1) Analyse the social costs of the people's salt industry in Bima Regency; (2) Analyse the private and social benefits of the people's salt industry in Bima Regency; (3) Determine the obstacles faced by farmers in the people's salt industry in Bima Regency. The analytical method used in this research is descriptive, while data collection is conducted through a survey. The unit of analysis used in this research is the people's salt industry actors in Bima Regency. This research was conducted in two sub-districts, namely Woha Sub-district in Talabiu Village and Bolo Sub-district in Sanolo Village, using "Purposive Sampling". Respondents were selected using "Quota Sampling", and the number of respondents was determined using the "Slovin" formula, resulting in 43 respondents. The selection of respondents as a sample was carried out using "accidental sampling". The data types are quantitative and qualitative, and the data sources are primary and secondary. The results of the study show: (1) The social costs of the people's salt industry in Bima Regency are IDR 12,304,889/ha; (2) The private profit of the people's salt industry in Bima Regency is 1,328,480 / ha, while the social profit is IDR 6,140,355 / ha. The B/C ratio value is 0.33 (B/C ≥ 0). Thus, the people's salt industry in Bima Regency is feasible to be developed from an economic and social perspective; (3) The main obstacles faced by the people's salt industry in Bima Regency are marketing and unstable selling prices with 17 respondents (39.53%), followed by capital and marketing constraints with 13 respondents (30.23%), and unstable weather, quality, and selling prices with 10 respondents (23.26%). Meanwhile, the smallest obstacles are capital and weather, with 3 respondents (6.98%). This shows that the marketing aspect is the biggest and most urgent problem to be addressed in developing the people's salt industry.

Keywords

Social costs, people's salt industry, Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM)

Downloads

References

1. Amin, AA (2023). Greenhouse salt tunnel as an innovation to create salt production in the south coast of Malang Regency, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Development and Nature, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpal.2023.014.01.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amir, N., Efendy, M., & Azmi, MNL (2023). Experimental investigation of a convection - improved solar salt evaporation system. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 16, 237-242 https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v16i.9987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Budi, A. (2024). Analysis of the Application of the Slovin Formula in Scientific Research: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Errors from a Statistical Perspective. Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Humanities. 1, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bima Regency Marine Affairs and Fisheries Service. (2024). Bima Regency Marine Affairs and Fisheries Service Annual Report 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. NTB Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Service. (2023). Annual Report of the NTB Provincial Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Service 2023. 0, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ghozali, ABM and Samputra, PL (2022). Salt import policy strategy to protect national salt production. Ijd-Demos, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v4i4.341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gittinger, JP 1986. Economic Analysis of Agricultural Projects. Translated by Sutomo and Mangiri. Second Edition. University of Indonesia Press, Jakarta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hakim, AR, Dewi, SS, Prastika, Y., Darajah, LII, Adriana, R., Salsabila, RRN, … & Sarjan, M. (2023). Introduction to smart farming for the millennial generation. Unram Journal of Community Service, 4(1), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.29303/ujcs.v4i1.435 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. İlter, FM (2023). The examination of the values of education through teachers' views: sample of a secondary school. International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education, 02(03). https://doi.org/10.58806/ijirme.2023.v2i3n07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. (2023). Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Performance Report 2022. Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, 164. https://kkp.go.id/an-component/media/upload-gambar-pendukung/kkp/LAPORAN/Laporan Kinerja KKP/2022/20230316_Laporan Kinerja KKP 2022.pdf 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mardiyanta, A. and Ermawan, D. (2023). Gray area between policy success and failure: assessing the degree of success of law number 7 of 2016 in the salt industrialization program in West Nusa Tenggara province. Society, Culture and Politics, 36(1), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v36i12023.156-171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Marfai, MA (2023). Salt Production Potential in Coastal Areas of Yogyakarta. UGM PRESS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Monke, EA, Peason, Scott R. 1989. The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development. Cornell University Press. Ithaca and London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nazir, M. 2014. Research Methods. Ghalia Indonesia: Bogor Pradana, Y. and Arijanto, A. (2024). Implementation of strategic human resource management in improving the quality of education. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics, 4(2), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijba.v4i2.8599 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Saptana, S., Sukmaya, SG, Perwita, AD, Malihah, FD, Wardhana, IW, Pitaloka, AD, … & Saliem, HP (2023). Competitiveness analysis of fresh tomatoes in Indonesia: turning comparative advantage into competitive advantage. Plos One, 18(11), e0294980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tebay, V. (2023). Indonesian policy choices on salt. Formosan Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(7), 1601-1610. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v2i7.5005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tjahyadi, I. 2024. Research Methodology. Karawang Regency: CV Saba Jaya Publisher. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ulfiyah, AR (2023). Analysis of the Competitiveness of Red Onion Farming in Bima Regency. 2 (1), 349– 365. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles