Multi-Dimensional Factors Shaping Online Shopping Behavior Among Malaysian Working Adults: A Qualitative Exploration

Authors

Nadiah Farhanah Mohamad Farouk

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Zuratul Ain Rosli

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Nur Shahirah Mohamad Rosli

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Nur Farhana Mohd Sharifuddin

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Norkhairen Adzren Shamiela Khairul Adzmi

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Faizah Mohd Fakhruddin

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100189

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 2395-2417

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-10

Accepted: 2026-01-15

Published: 2026-01-29

Abstract

This study explores the key factors influencing online shopping behavior among Malaysian working adults, offering insights into the diverse drivers shaping consumer preferences and decision-making in the growing e-commerce landscape. The study employs a qualitative approach and case study design. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews with five working adult informants, three females and two males, chosen using purposive sampling and snowball sampling techniques. The data were coded using NVivo 15 and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings highlight several important themes that influence the informants' online shopping behavior, including social, economic, service- and technology-related, political, and psychological factors. The sub-themes under social factors are family and friends’ influence, endorsements from social media influencers, online consumer reviews, and convenience. The economic factors include promotional and financial incentives, the convenience of payment methods, and cross-platform price comparison. Service- and technology-related factors include fast delivery, responsive customer service, user-friendly interface and navigation, visual information quality, detailed and accurate product descriptions, and loyalty and repeat purchase intentions. The only political factor concerns government support and regulation. Finally, psychological factors include fear-of-missing-out (FOMO)-driven purchases, mood-driven shopping, scarcity- and urgency-driven buying, anticipation and post-purchase emotions, and awareness of online scams. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the complex factors that influence online shopping behavior among working adults in Malaysia. However, the findings are limited by a small sample size, which hinders generalizability. Future research should employ quantitative or mixed-method approaches with larger samples to improve generalizability. Additionally, the study recommends raising consumer awareness and digital literacy to encourage ethical online purchasing and strengthen trust in online platforms.

Keywords

online shopping behavior, Malaysian consumers, e-commerce, consumer decision making

Downloads

References

1. Akhlaq, A., & Ahmed, E. (2015). Digital commerce in emerging economies: Factors associated with online shopping intentions in Pakistan. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(4), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-01-2014-0051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aljabari, M. A., Joudeh, J. M., Aljumah, A. I., Al-Gasawneh, J., & Daoud, M. K. (2023). The impact of website quality on online purchase intention: The mediating effect of e-WOM, Jordan context. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(6), e02143. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i6.2143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anderson, R. E., & Srinivasan, S. S. (2003). E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: A contingency framework. Psychology and Marketing, 20(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aryani, D. N., Nair, R. K., Hoo, D. X. Y., Hung, D. K. M., Lim, D. H. R., Chandran, D. R., Chew, W. P., & Desai, A. (2021). A study on consumer behaviour: Transition from traditional shopping to online shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 6(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v6i2.1170 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baharin, S. N. K., Aziz, N. A., & Mahmud, S. H. (2024). e-Shopping behavior: An empirical study of Malaysian consumers. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 16(2(J)), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v16i2(J).3762 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Barry, M., & Jan, M. T. (2018). Factors influencing the use of m-commerce: An extended technology acceptance model perspective. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 26(1), 157–183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, J. V., Su, B. C., & Widjaja, A. E. (2016). Facebook C2C social commerce: A study of online impulse buying. Decision Support Systems, 83, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.12.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, Y. F., Chen, C. H., & Lai, J. S. (2022). Influence of promotional formats on online consumer purchase intention. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy, 13(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2014). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chong, A. Y. L., Liu, M. J., Luo, J., & Ooi, K. B. (2018). Predicting RFID adoption in healthcare supply chain from the perspective of users. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2009). Perceived interactivity leading to e-loyalty: Development of a model for cognitive-affective user responses. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(10), 850–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.07.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Do, Q. H., Kim, T. Y., & Wang, X. (2023). Effects of logistics service quality and price fairness on customer repurchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58(1), 34–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Duarte, P., Silva, S. C., & Ferreira, M. B. (2018). How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2015). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gunawan, C. M., Rahmania, L., & Kenang, I. H. (2023). The influence of social and peer influence on intention to purchase in e-commerce. Review of Management and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 61–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Habib, N., Khoso, S. H., & Javaid, A. (2022). Customer trust and purchase intention in online shopping. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 3(3), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2022(3-iii)62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hajli, M. N. (2014). A study of the impact of social media on consumers. International Journal of Market Research, 56(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2014-025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Handoyo, S. (2024). Purchasing in the digital age: A meta-analytical perspective on trust, risk, security, and e-WOM in e-commerce. Heliyon, 10(8), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29714 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2014). Product fit uncertainty in online markets. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Huang, L. T. (2016). Flow and social capital theory in online impulse buying. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2277–2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hübner, A. H., Kuhn, H., & Wollenburg, J. (2016). Last-mile fulfilment and distribution in omni-channel grocery retailing. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ighomereho, S. O., Ojo, A. A., Omoyele, S. O., & Olabode, S. O. (2022). From service quality to e-service quality. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 25(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.00055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Javed, M. K., & Wu, M. (2020). Effects of online retailer after-delivery services on repurchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 101942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2007). Investigating the influence of functional mechanisms of online product presentations. Information Systems Research, 18(4), 367–475. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kang, J. Y. M., Johnson, K. K. P., & Wu, J. (2014). Consumer style inventory and intent to shop online. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 18(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-09-2012-0057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). Trust and satisfaction in e-commerce relationships. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 237–257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Kim, H. W., Xu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2012). Perceived price versus trust in internet shopping. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.06.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Laudon, K. C., & Traver, C. G. (2020). E-commerce: Business, technology, society (16th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. McLean, G., & Osei-Frimpong, K. (2017). Satisfaction during live chat service encounters. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 494–508. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Mok, O. (2025, November 13). Online shopping boom in Malaysia. Malay Mail. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2008). A theory of regret regulation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles