Development of Human Circulatory System Prototype as a Teaching Tool Among Secondary School Students

The Form 3 Science curriculum in Malaysia includes the Maintenance and Continuity of Life theme, within which students often encounter difficulties visualizing internal organ structures and circulatory processes, particularly heart anatomy. To address these challenges, this study reports a preliminary evaluation of CirculaBody, an interactive circulatory system prototype comprising a Heart Anatomy Puzzle and a Blood Flow Board. The prototype was developed using the ADDIE instructional design model and aims to support experiential learning through tactile and visual representations. Prototype testing was conducted with 15 Form 3 students from a single secondary school using a pre-test and post-test design. Results indicate a modest overall improvement in test scores, with greater learning gains observed in items requiring spatial and structural understanding of heart anatomy. Questionnaire feedback suggests that students perceived the prototype as helpful for visualizing circulatory structures compared to conventional two-dimensional representations. However, the absence of a control group and the small sample size limit causal inference and generalizability. The findings provide initial insights into the pedagogical potential of hands-on and representational learning tools for lower secondary biology and highlight areas for refinement and further investigation through larger-scale, controlled studies.

circulatory system, interactive prototype, anatomy education, experiential learning, science and technology development

1. B. David, “Working Model Hearts,” ERIC, vol. 76, pp. 36–40, Dec. 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. H. Gulnaz, “Shortcomings of current anatomy teaching methodologies in medical schools and possible avenues of improvement: A comparative study between undergraduates, postgraduate students and teaching faculty,” Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences (P J M H S), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 558–560, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. E. Setyantoko, J. H. Nunaki, J. Jeni, and I. Damopolii, “Development of human digestive system e-module to improve students’ learning outcomes during pandemic,” in Proceedings of AIP Conference, Jan. 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105782. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. S. Anjur, “Using heart models for physiology teaching and learning,” Faculty Publications & Research, Jan. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.imsa.edu/sci_pr/15/. [Accessed: Aug. 17, 2025]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. T. Arai and T. Arai, “Virtual lung model for education in phonetics and speech science,” Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 173–174, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. T. Slominski, “Physiology is hard: A replication study of students’ perceived learning difficulties,” Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Exploring the Moderating Role of Demographic Variables in the Relationship Between Scientific Curiosity and Creativity Among Secondary School Students
• Development of a CODE-Based Teaching Guide on the Central Dogma in Biochemistry: A Study in the Philippines
• Scaffolding Genetics Learning in Resource-Constrained Classrooms: Effects of Inquiry-Based Worksheets on Student Achievement
• Chronological Versus Biological Age: The Role of Diet and Healthy Lifestyle in Modulating Epigenetic Aging
• Exploring Relationship Between Reaction Time and Academic Achievement in Science Subjects of Middle Stage Students