When Home is the Office: Revisiting Occupational Safety Laws in Remote Work

Authors

Nurul Iman Hamzah

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Nur Iwani Mohd Sani

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Asha Tasnim Ab Razak

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Hanafi Haron

Center of Innovation and Technology Transfer, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Adlan Abdul Razak

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mohd Haris Abdul Rani

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100225

Subject Category: Law; Industrial Relations

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 2881-2891

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-14

Accepted: 2026-01-19

Published: 2026-01-31

Abstract

Remote work has rapidly shifted from a temporary arrangement to a sustained employment model, reshaping how work is organised and where occupational risks arise. This development challenges traditional occupational safety and health (OSH) regulation, which has historically been designed around physical workplaces under employer control. In Malaysia, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (OSHA) establishes general duties for ensuring employee safety. However, its application to home-based work remains legally uncertain due to the absence of explicit statutory recognition of remote work environments as workplaces. This paper examines whether Malaysia’s current OSH framework sufficiently protects remote workers, focusing on the regulatory gaps associated with physical hazards, ergonomic risks, psychosocial harm, enforcement limitations, and employer liability in non-employercontrolled settings. Adopting a doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, the study analyses Malaysia’s legal structure alongside selected approaches from other jurisdictions, with particular reference to the United Kingdom’s broader duty of care framework under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The analysis is further contextualised using international labour standards, including the International Labour Organization’s Home Work Convention 1996 (No. 177), which articulates principles of equal protection for home-based workers, although Malaysia has not ratified the Convention. The findings indicate that Malaysia’s existing regulatory architecture does not adequately reflect the realities of remote work, leaving both workers and employers without clear guidance on responsibility allocation and compliance. The paper proposes targeted legal and policy reforms, including clarifying statutory definitions, strengthening regulatory guidance on remote OSH, recognising psychosocial hazards as part of OSH protection, and establishing practical mechanisms for enforcement in home-based work arrangements.

Keywords

Remote work; OSH regulation; comparative law; United Kingdom; Malaysia

Downloads

References

1. Altaher, A. E., & Mohamed, E. A. S. (2025). Sustainable media consumption in the Kingdom of Bahrain: Analysing the effects of the coronavirus pandemic. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84636-6_13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bureau Veritas. (2020, April 20). Workplace health and safety in the age of the home office. https://certification.bureauveritas.com/magazine/workplace-health-and-safety-age-home-office [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cruz-Ausejo, L., Copez-Lonzoy, A., Vilela-Estrada, A. L., Valverde, J. J., Bohórquez, M., & Moscoso-Porras, M. (2022). Can working at home be a hazard? Ergonomic factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders among teleworkers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(4), 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2127246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia. (2024). Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994. http://www.dosh.gov.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia. (2024, June 1). Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (Act 514): Reprint as at 1 June 2024. Department of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2021). Telework and health risks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the literature (EU-OSHA report). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2802/84372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2023). Telework and health risks in the workplace. https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/telework-and-health-risks-workplace [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2023, November 9). Surveillance and monitoring of remote workers: Implications for occupational safety and health. https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/surveillance-and-monitoring-remote-workers-implicationsoccupational-safety-and-health [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Goh, K. (2020). Legal implications of working from home in Malaysia. Lexology. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4a2ee340-dc0c-4b29-aadc-7601b76e24ab [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, c. 37 (UK). (1974). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/37 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. HR Hub. (2024, August 13). The Malaysian workforce faces record burnout levels. https://hrhub.my/the-malaysian-workforce-faces-record-burnout-levels/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. HRD Asia. (2022, September 27). ‘Alarming’ mental health issues present in Malaysian workplaces. https://www.hcamag.com/asia/specialisation/mental-health/alarming-mental-health-issues-present-inmalaysian-workplaces/421826 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Labour Organization. (1996). Home Work Convention, 1996 (No. 177). https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID :312322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. International Labour Organization. (2024, September 25). Malaysia and ILO strengthen commitment to industrial harmony at landmark conference. https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/malaysia-and-ilostrengthen-commitment-industrial-harmony-landmark [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. International Labour Organization. (n.d.). Occupational safety and health in telework. Retrieved April 20, 2025, from https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/lang--en/index.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Li, C., Anthony, L. E., Nagata, T., Cheng, Y., & Lin, R. (2024). Effect of government guidelines and corporate governance on telework adoption and occupational health measures in Taiwanese-listed companies. Safety and Health at Work, 15(2), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2024.04.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Peoplesafe. (2023, January 24). Working from home – legislation and risks. https://peoplesafe.co.uk/blogs/working-from-home-legislation-and-health-safety-risks/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Safety Notes. (2023). Safety management for remote workers. https://www.safetynotes.net/safetymanagement-for-remote-workers/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sava, Z. (2025). The global shift towards remote work and its legal implications. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 12(1 Suppl. 1), 279. https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv12n1s137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Schall, M. C., Jr., & Chen, P. (2022). Evidence-based strategies for improving occupational safety and health among teleworkers during and after the coronavirus pandemic. Human Factors, 64(8), 1404– 1411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820984583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Society for Human Resource Management. (2022). How to manage workplace safety issues for remote employees. https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/employment-law-compliance/how-to-manageworkplace-safety-issues-remote-employees [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tay & Partners. (2021). Occupational safety and health and the new normal: Working from home. https://www.taypartners.com.my/media/pdfs/OSH%20Working%20from%20Home.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. The Star. (2025, January 21). Trade unions’ programmes fund raised to RM10mil. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2025/01/21/trade-unions-programmes-fund-raised-torm10mil [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wahab, H. A., Razak, S. S. A., & Mahmod, N. A. K. N. A. (2022). Legal issues in working from home amid Covid-19 pandemic in Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. World Health Organization, & International Labour Organization. (2022, September 28). WHO and ILO call for new measures to tackle mental health issues at work. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-09-2022-who-and-ilo-call-for-new-measures-to-tackle-mental-health-issues-at-work [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Yeoh, L., & Pua, J. W. (2022). Statutory protection for employees working from home in Malaysia? In legalTAPS (Mar. 2022 issue). Tay & Partners. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://taypartners.com.my/wpcontent/uploads/2022/03/legalTAPS_Q1-2022.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles