Fear as Governance: How Security Narratives Reshape Religious Freedom in Nigeria

In recent years, security concerns have increasingly shaped legal and political discourse in Nigeria, particularly in response to insurgency, terrorism, and communal violence. While these developments are often justified as necessary for maintaining public order, their broader implications for religious freedom remain underexamined. This article explores how security-driven fear narratives function as a form of governance that reshapes religious freedom beyond formal legal restrictions. Drawing on securitisation theory and interdisciplinary scholarship on law, religion, and governance, the article argues that fear operates through informal mechanisms such as social surveillance, anticipatory self-censorship, and conditional tolerance of religious expression. Using Nigeria as a case study, the analysis demonstrates how both Christian and Muslim communities experience the effects of securitised fear in uneven yet interconnected ways. The article highlights the disjunction between constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and lived religious practice in securitised contexts, underscoring the limits of legal protection where governance operates through informal and discursive means. It concludes by reflecting on the implications of fear-based governance for democratic pluralism and social cohesion in multi-religious societies.

In recent decades, Nigeria has become a focal point of global and domestic security discourse

1. Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amnesty International. (2015). Nigeria: Human rights violations in the fight against Boko Haram. Amnesty International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balzacq, T. (2011). Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1975) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Human Rights Watch. (2022). World report 2022: Nigeria. Human Rights Watch. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. International Crisis Group. (2016). Nigeria’s Northeast: Preventing mass atrocities. International Crisis Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ostien, P. (2012). Religion and the Nigerian Constitution. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Robin, C. (2004). Fear: The history of a political idea. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Zedner, L. (2007). Pre-crime and post-criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 261–281. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar