A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of Persons with Disabilities in English Language Textbooks in Cameroon

This paper examines English Language textbooks used in Cameroonian secondary schools with the aim of investigating the representation of people with disabilities in the textbooks. The study adopts the content analysis design to analyse the images, sentences and texts used in the textbooks in order to determine the space occupied by persons with disabilities and the ideological perceptions associated to them in the textbook. Data for the study are collected by observing the images and reading through the sentences and texts in the five English Language textbooks used in Form One, Two, Three, Four and Five of the Anglophone sub-system of education in Cameroon – Prime English Book 1, Prime English Book 2, Innovative English Book 3, Prime English Book 4 and Prime English Book 5, respectively. The data are analysed based on the Critical Discourse Analysis framework at two levels. The first stage involves statistical recording of the various occurrences of people with disabilities in the images, sentences and texts, and classifying them according to the different types of impairments (visual, hearing, mobility, mental). The second stage of the analysis involves critically examining the different occurrences of people with disabilities in the textbooks in order to determine ideological perceptions associated with their presentation. The findings reveal the limited space attributed to persons with disabilities in English Language textbooks at both the pictorial and lexical levels. Besides, the rhetoric associated with their presentation in the textbooks is sometimes negative and derogatory. It is recommended that within the context of inclusive education advocated by the government of Cameroon, more space should be allocated to persons with disabilities in school textbooks coupled with a more positive presentation of these people. This would positively influence perceptions and attitude of other learners towards people with disabilities.

Representation, disability, impairments, perception

1. Acas. (2023). Types of disability discrimination. https://www.acas.org.uk/disabilitydiscrimination/types-of-disability-discrimination [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asghar, A. (2023). Sensory Impairments: The Effects on Social Interaction and Mental Health. Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids, 11 (1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cheng, K. & Beigi, A. (2011). Addressing students with disabilities in school textbooks. Disability & Society, 26(2):239-242. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2011.544063. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cockburn, L., Cleaver, S., & Benuh, E. (2014). The Prevalence of Impairments and Disabilities in the North West Region, Cameroon. Health Sciences and Disease, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/hsd.v15i2.332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cockburn, L., Hashemi, G., Noumi, C., Ritchie, A., & Skead, K. (2017). Realizing the educational rights of children with disabilities: An overview of inclusive education in Cameroon. Journal of Education and Practice, 8 (6), ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2025). Disability and Health Overview. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. European Commission (nd.). Persons with disabilities. Commission.europa.eu. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gulya, N. & Fehervari, A. (2023). Addressing disability representation in EFL textbooks used in Hungarian public education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4 (2023) 100226. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hodkinson, A. (2007). Inclusive Education and the cultural representation of disability and Disabled people within the English Education System: A critical examination of the mediating influence of primary school textbooks. IATERM e-journal, 1 (1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21344/iartem.v1i1.805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jensen, M., Herrebroden, M. & Andreassen, U. (2021). The invisible minority: why do textbook authors avoid people with disabilities in their books? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27 (12): 1287-1303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1889049. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jensen, M. (2023). Representation of people with disabilities in school textbooks: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(8), 901-920. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Loaiza, E. & Cappa, C. (2005). Measuring Children’s Disability Via Household Surveys: The MICS Experience. UNICEF: Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Medical News Today (2021). Ableism: Types, examples, impact, and anti-ableism. Available at: www.medicalnewstoday.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Republic of Cameroon (2018). Decree No. 2018/6233/PM of 26 Jul 2018 Setting the Implementation Procedures for Law No. 2010/002 of 13 April 2010 on the Protection and Promotion of Persons with Disabilities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Simo Fotso, A., Duthé, G. & Odimegwu, C. (2019). A comparative analysis of disability measures in Cameroonian surveys. Population Health Metrics, 17 (16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-019-0198-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. United Nations, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976). Fundamental Principles of Disability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Van Dijk T. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse. (1): 17-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Van Dijk T. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Deborah T., Heidi E., Deborah S. (Eds), The handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466-485). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wodak, R. (2002). Aspects of Critical Discourse Analyis. ZfAL 35, 5 – 31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Health Organization (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. World Health Organisation (2002). Mental disorders. Available at: https://www.who.int/news room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. World Health Organisation (2003). Disability. WHO fact sheet on disability and health. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. World Health Organisation (n.d.). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Available at: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international classification- of-functioning-disability-and-health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar