Application of Learning Brochure in Mitosis: Effects on Mainstream Learners’ Test Performance in Biology 8

Mainstream learners are often marginalized in the classroom when instructional practices fail to address their specific educational needs. These are difficulties or disabilities that make it harder for a child to learn than most peers of the same age. This preliminary study examined the effectiveness of a learning brochure as an instructional intervention in Biology 8 in the topic Stages of Mitosis among mainstream learners. A one-group pretest–posttest design was employed to assess changes in academic performance and to examine the relationship between learner profiles and test outcomes. It showed that the majority of the respondents were female and aged 13-15 years, they completed a pretest, then independently studied a take-home learning brochure for 24 hours, and completed a posttest. Due to the small sample size, non-parametric statistical analysis was used. Results revealed a strong, statistically significant negative correlation between age and posttest scores (ρ = −0.708, p = 0.049), indicating lower posttest performance among older mainstream learners. A moderate positive correlation was observed between pretest and posttest scores (ρ = 0.490), though this relationship was not statistically significant (p = 0.218). These suggested a general trend that better initial performance leads to better final performance, thus, the learning material in Biology 8 showed initial effectiveness in the positive performance of the mainstream learners. Subsequently, gain scores implied that the learning brochure may support improved academic performance. Future researches should involve larger samples, longer study periods, and additional Biology topics to promote its relevance.

Biology 8, Learning Brochure, Mainstream Learners

1. Wahyuni, S., Rahmawati, S., Sudibya, E., Lestari, J. W., DTherik, J. W., & Pekei, I. F. M. (2024). The urgency of understanding the definition and category of teaching materials as knowledge for biology education students. International Journal of Sustainable English Language Education and Science, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.71131/whtmf855 [2] Mainstreaming | Cal State LA. (n.d.). https://www.calstatela.edu/coe/cats/mainstreaming#:~:text=Mainstreaming%20is%20the%20practice%2 0of,in%20the%20least%20restrictive%20environment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Strogilos, V., Lim, L., & Binte Mohamed Buhari, N. (2021). Differentiated instruction for students with SEN in mainstream classrooms: contextual features and types of curriculum modifications. Asia Pacific [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Journal of Education, 43(3), 850–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1984873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hansen A., Langdon T., Mendrin L., Peters, K., Ramos J., David D. (2020). Exploring the Potential of 3D-printing in Biological Education: A Review of the Literature. SYMPOSIUM. Integrative and Comparative Biology. The Urgency of Understanding the Definition and Category of Teaching Materials as Knowledge for Biology Education Students. International Journal of Sustainable English [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Language, Education, and Science. https://ejournal.cwcu.ac.id/index.php/IJSELES/article/view/8 [5] Mensah, D. (2015). Using Improvised Instructional Materials to Teach Chemical Methods. New Mexico Tech- Education and Psychology Department. https://www.nmt.edu/academics/psyched/docs/chemistry.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Yitbarek, S. & Kotebe College of Teacher Education. (2012). LOW-COST APPARATUS FROM LOCALLY AVAILABLE MATERIALS FOR TEACHING-LEARNING SCIENCE. In AJCE (Vol. 2, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Issue 1, pp. 32–37) [Journal-article]. https://scispace.com/pdf/low-cost-apparatus-from-locally-availablematerials-for-52cyy1jsx0.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2018). Use of improvised experiment materials to improve Teacher Training College students’ achievements in Physics, Rwanda. In African Journal of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences: Vol. Vol. 14 (pp. 63–65). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED595350.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Park, S. & Education Research Institute, Seoul National University, Korea. (2022). A study on visual Scaffolding Design Principles in Web-Based Learning Environments. The Electronic Journal of eLearning, 20–2, 180–200. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1333640.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Offerdahl, E. G., Arneson, J. B., & Byrne, N. (2017). Lighten the load: Scaffolding visual literacy in biochemistry and molecular biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(1), es1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-06-0193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lehane, P., & Senior, J. (2019). Collaborative teaching: exploring the impact of co-teaching practices on the numeracy attainment of pupils with and without special educational needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1652439 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gur P. and Yikins A. (2021). Determining Practices of Classroom Teachers Who Have Mainstreaming and Special Needs Students in Their Classes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. ResearchGate.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354252849_Determining_Practices_of_Classroo m_Teachers_Who_Have_Mainstreaming_and_Special_Needs_Students_in_Their_Classes [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kossewska, J., Bombińska-Domżał, A., Cierpiałowska, T., Lubińska-Kościółek, E., Niemiec, S., Płoszaj, M., & Preece, D. R. (2022). Towards inclusive education of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. The impact of teachers’ autism-specific professional development on their confidence in their professional competences. International Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2021.36.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Staffans, E., & Ström, K. (2022). Mission impossible? Finnish itinerant early childhood special education teachers’ views of their work and working conditions. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 11(3), 1–21. https://journal.fi/jecer/article/view/120395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tonks, D., Kimmons, R. & Mason, S.L. (2020). Mattering is Motivating: Special Education Students’ Experiences with an Online Charter School. Journal of Online Learning Research, 6(3), 221-244. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 9, 2025 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/217275/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Van Mieghem, A., Struyf, E., & Verschueren, K. (2020). The relevance of sources of support for teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs towards students with special educational needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1829866 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rangvid, B. S. (2023). Long-run results of mainstreaming students with special educational needs in lower secondary school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2263466 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sayan, H., & Mertoglu, H. (2020). Equipment Use in Biology Teaching. Journal of Educational Issues, 6(1), 357–371. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1260007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Obiano, J., Parangat, K., (2023). Assessing the Effect of Polya’s Theory in Improving Problem- Solving Ability of Grade 11 Students in San Marcelino District. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), p. 116.Retrieved from https://www.ajhssr.com/wp- content/uploads/2023/08/L23708110119.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Yapatang, L., Polyiem, (2022). T. Development of the Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability Using Applied Cooperative Learning and Polya’s Problem-Solving Process for Grade 9 Students. Journal of Education and Learning; Vol. 11, No. 3;2022. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1345988.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Korem, A. (2024). It’s normal not to be normally (distributed): what to do when data is not normally distributed. Statsig. https://www.statsig.com/blog/what-to-do-when-data-is-not-normally-distributed [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Estrada, E., Ferrer, E., & Pardo, A. (2019). Statistics for evaluating pre-post change: relation between change in the distribution center and change in the individual scores. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2696. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gain Scores, Analysis of. (2010). Encyclopedia of Research Design https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Yavuz, H. C., & Kutlu, Ö. (2019). Examination of student growth using gain score and categorical growth models. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 487–505. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.61679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar