Reforming Gendered Rape Definitions: A Comparative Doctrinal Analysis of Malaysia’s Penal Code and Canada’s Sexual Assault Framework

This paper examines the doctrinal limitations of Section 375 of the Malaysian Penal Code, which adopts a gender-specific definition of rape that effectively confines principal liability to male offenders and restricts the offence to penile–vaginal penetration. This statutory structure creates significant prosecutorial gaps where female sexual offenders are involved and may result in unequal legal protection for victims, including male victims. These concerns raise broader constitutional implications under Article 8 of the Federal Constitution and compliance considerations in light of Malaysia’s international obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Using a doctrinal comparative approach, the study contrasts Malaysia’s rape framework with Canada’s gender-neutral sexual assault model under Section 271 of the Canadian Criminal Code, as enacted through amendments introduced by Bill C-127 in 1983. The Canadian framework criminalises non-consensual sexual touching regardless of gender and centres liability on consent rather than anatomy, reinforced through consent-centred judicial interpretation and protective procedural mechanisms. The comparative findings suggest that Malaysia’s current approach may be difficult to reconcile with purposive equality reasoning and contemporary expectations of comprehensive legal protection against sexual violence. This paper accordingly proposes reform of Section 375 towards a gender-neutral model, drawing on Canada’s consent-based framework to strengthen accountability, enhance victim protection, and promote doctrinal coherence.

Rape law; sexual assault; gender neutrality

1. Ahmad, R. (2019). Criminal law in Malaysia. LexisNexis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bill C-127, An Act to amend the Criminal Code in relation to sexual offences and other offences against the person, S.C. 1983, c. 125 (Canada). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Busby, K. (1992). Reforming sexual assault law in Canada. University of British Columbia Law Review, 25, 297–331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), c. 11, s. 15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Canadian Judicial Council. (2017, April 20). Submissions on Bill C-337: Judicial Accountability through Sexual Assault Law Training Act. https://cjc-ccm.ca/en/resources-center/publications/submissions-bill-c-337-2017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. (2017). General recommendation No. 35 on gender-based violence against women, updating general recommendation No. 19 (CEDAW/C/GC/35). United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, December 18, 1979, 1249 U.N.T.S. 13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Correctional Service Canada. (2017). Assessment of the Aboriginal women offender correctional programs: Outcomes (Publication No. R-391). https://www.canada.ca/en/correctional-service/corporate/library/research/glance/391.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cortoni, F. (2012). Female sexual offending: Causes and profiles. Public Safety Canada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cortoni, F., & Hanson, R. K. (2005). A review of the female sexual offender research. Public Safety Canada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cortoni, F., & Marshall, W. L. (2015). Female sexual offenders: An overview. Public Safety Canada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, ss. 271–273, 276, 718 (Canada). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Criminal Procedure Code (Act 593), s. 289 (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2021). Crime statistics, Malaysia, 2021. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/crime-statistics-malaysia-2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Endut, N. (2016). Colonial legacies in Malaysian sexual offence law. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 3(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2016.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Federal Constitution (Malaysia), art. 8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Fisher, D., & Marshall, W. L. (2015). Female sexual offenders: Theory, assessment and treatment. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gannon, T. A., Rose, M. R., & Ward, T. (2008). A descriptive model of the offence process for female sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20(3), 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208322495 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gannon, T. A., Waugh, G., Taylor, K., Blanchette, K., O’Connor, A., Blake, E., & Ó Ciardha, C. (2014). Women who sexually offend display three main offence styles: A re-examination of the descriptive model of female sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 26(3), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213486835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Harrison, K., & Rainey, B. (Eds.). (2018). Legal responses to sexual violence. Hart Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Koshan, J. (2018). R v J.A. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 30(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lisak, D. (1994). The psychological impact of sexual abuse: Content analysis of interviews with male survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7(4), 525–548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development (Malaysia). (2019). Violence response guidelines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nadesan, K., & Omar, S. Z. (2002). Rape: The Malaysian scenario. Malaysian Journal of Pathology, 24(1), 9–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Penal Code (Act 574), ss. 109, 354, 375, 377CA (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pendakwa Raya v Diana Anak Jantin, MLJU 302 (2017) (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. PP v Bunyamin bin Zainal [1998] 4 MLJ 249 (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. PP v Mohd Noor Jaafar [2009] 7 MLJ 451 (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. PP v Ng Choon Heong [1999] 4 MLJ 126 (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. PP v Syariffuddin Abdul Rahman, MLJU 2122 (2016) (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Public Safety Canada. (2019). Corrections and Conditional Release Statistical Overview 2019. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ccrso-2019/ccrso-2019-en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. R v Chase [1987] 2 SCR 293 (Supreme Court of Canada). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. R v CMG, 2016 ABQB 368 (Canada). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. R v Ewanchuk [1999] 1 SCR 330 (Supreme Court of Canada). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. R v J.A. [2011] 2 SCR 440 (Supreme Court of Canada). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. R v LSV, 2017 ONCA 975 (Canada). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 (Act 792), s. 14 (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Shamsuddin, J. (2019). Reforming rape laws in Malaysia. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 4, 77–89 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Vandiver, D. M., & Kercher, G. (2004). Offender and victim characteristics of registered female sex offenders in Texas: A proposed typology of female sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ward, T., & Keenan, T. (1999). Child molesters’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 821–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014008003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wendt, S., & Zannettino, L. (2021). Domestic violence in diverse contexts. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.