The Illusion of Permanent Allies

This article examines the concept of permanent allies in international politics and explains why it remains a misleading guide. States often speak and act as if alliances reflect shared values, lasting trust, or moral commitment. In practice, alliances persist only as long as they serve concrete interests tied to power, security, and survival. The article argues that the belief in permanent allies obscures how states actually make decisions and leads policymakers to misread shifts in behaviour as betrayal rather than adjustment. Drawing on classical realism, structural realism, and selected historical cases, the paper shows that alliances function as temporary instruments shaped by threat perception, relative power, and domestic constraints. When these conditions change, alliances weaken, realign, or dissolve. The article also addresses how rhetoric, public diplomacy, and institutional frameworks can prolong the appearance of stability even as underlying interests diverge. This gap between language and behaviour creates policy risk, especially for smaller states that anchor their security planning on assumed loyalty from stronger partners. The discussion highlights cases where states maintained formal alliances while acting at cross purposes on trade, security, and regional influence. It also considers moments where rapid realignment occurred without ideological transformation. The article concludes that abandoning the notion of permanent allies improves strategic clarity. Policymakers who plan around interests rather than sentiment reduce surprise, manage expectations, and retain flexibility. The illusion of permanence may offer short-term reassurance, but it weakens long-term strategic judgment.

Illusion ,Permanent , Allies

1. Achen, C. H. (2024). Realism and Rationality. Critical Review, 36(4), 541-559. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alberque, W., & Schreer, B. (2022). What Kind of NATO Allies Will Finland and Sweden Be?. Survival, 64(6), 123-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Angell, N. (2022). The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage. DigiCat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Blankenship, B., & Lin-Greenberg, E. (2022). Trivial tripwires?: Military capabilities and alliance reassurance. Security Studies, 31(1), 92-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Choi, S., Kim, W., & Kim, N. (2022). International alliance formations: The role of brokerage in technology competition networks. Journal of Business Research, 144, 440-449. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crawford, T. W. (2024). Dark corners of alliance politics: alliance theory concepts and great power competition. International Politics, 1-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Del Sarto, R. A., & Soler i Lecha, E. (2024). Regionalism and alliances in the Middle East, 2011-2021: from a “flash in the Pan” of regional cooperation to liquid alliances. Geopolitics, 29(4), 1447-1473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Freeden, M. (2024). Liberalism. In The routledge companion to social and political philosophy (pp. 237-248). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Freedman, L. (2023). The Crisis of Liberalism and the Western Alliance. In Survival December 2021-January 2022: Trials of Liberalism (pp. 37-43). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Grajewski, N. (2022). An illusory entente: The myth of a Russia-China-Iran “axis”. Asian Affairs, 53(1), 164-183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gunn, A. (2020). The European universities initiative: A study of alliance formation in higher education. In European higher education area: Challenges for a new decade (pp. 13-30). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Johnson, J. C., & Joiner, S. (2021). Power changes, alliance credibility, and extended deterrence. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 38(2), 178-199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Krainin, C., & Schub, R. (2021). Alliance dynamics in the shadow of shifting power. International Studies Quarterly, 65(4), 905-918. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lanoszka, A. (2022). Military alliances in the twenty-first century. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lefebvre, A. (2024). Liberalism as a Way of Life. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lemmons, D. F. (2025). Alliances, Shared Identity, and Continued Cooperation (Doctoral dissertation, Appalachian State University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. MURGINSKI, P. (2023). The survival of NATO in the post-cold war era: a comparative analysis of neorealist and constructivist theories. Bulletin of" Carol I" National Defence University (EN), 12(01), 53-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nalapat, M. D. (2023). Cold War 2.0: Illusion Versus Reality. Penguin Random House India Private Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Overy, R. (2024). Why the Allies won. WW Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Petel, M. (2024). The illusion of harmony: Power, politics, and distributive implications of rights of nature. Transnational Environmental Law, 13(1), 12-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rachmad, Y. E. (2025). Social Constructivism Theory. United Nations Economic and Social Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rynning, S. (2024). NATO: from Cold War to Ukraine, a history of the world’s most powerful alliance. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Stoler, M. (2022). Allies in war: Britain and America against the Axis powers, 1940-1945. Plunkett Lake Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tabak, M. (2025). Hans J. Morgenthau’s Realism. In Realism in International Relations: The Making of a Disarrayed Tradition (pp. 55-81). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tjemkes, B., Vos, P., & Burgers, K. (2023). Strategic alliance management. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vormedal, I., & Meckling, J. (2024). How foes become allies: the shifting role of business in climate politics. Policy Sciences, 57(1), 101-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. William, F. K. A. (2024). Interpretivism or constructivism: Navigating research paradigms in social science research. Interpretivism or Constructivism: Navigating Research Paradigms in Social Science Research, 143(1), 5-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zajak, S., & Haunss, S. (2022). The politics of alliances. The making and breaking of social movement coalitions. Introduction to the special issue. Social Movement Studies, 21(1-2), 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• China in South Asia and South America: Connections, Intersections and Similarities
• Prospects and Impediments to China-Africa Sports Cooperation in the Contemporary Era
• Decolonising International Relations: African Perspectives on Global Justice - The Case of the Gambia in the International Court of Justice.
• Climate - Induced Displacement and its Implications on Human Security: A Case Study of Ghana
• Evaluating the Effectiveness of ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) in Promoting and Protecting Local Industries in West Africa (2015 – 2024)