Artificial Intelligence and Analytics in Action: Rethinking School Leadership in China’s K-12 Education

This qualitative study explores how school leaders in urban Chinese K12 schools perceive, implement, and navigate artificial intelligence and educational analytics in school management. Despite strong national policy promotion of AI driven educational transformation, empirical evidence on AI leadership practices in China remains limited. Drawing on semi structured interviews with eight principals and administrators from six public and private schools in Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, the study identifies four interrelated themes: an instrumental understanding of AI, fragmented application scenarios, multifaceted implementation challenges including limited expertise, ethical and privacy concerns, insufficient policy guidance, and resource constraints, and enabling leadership strategies such as vision building, professional development, data culture cultivation, and external collaboration. Based on these findings, the study proposes a contextualized AI leadership framework for Chinese K12 schools that conceptualizes AI integration as a dynamic interaction among policy directives, leadership agency, technological resources, and organizational culture. The findings offer theoretical insights into context sensitive AI leadership and provide practical implications for school leaders and policymakers seeking to promote strategic, ethical, and sustainable AI integration in education.

Artificial intelligence; educational analytics

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Karakose, T., Demirkol, M., Yirci, R., Polat, H., Ozdemir, T. Y., & Tülübaş, T. (2023). A conversation with ChatGPT about digital leadership and technology integration: Comparative analysis based on human–AI collaboration. Administrative Sciences, 13(7), 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13070157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mohan, G., & Brooks, J. (2023). Leading with data: Exploring the role of AI in instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221147723 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development (ED-2019/WS/8). UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pietsch, M., & Mah, D.-K. (2024). Leading the AI transformation in schools: It starts with a digital mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 1043–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10376-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Shen, J., & Xia, J. (2022). Data-driven decision-making in Chinese schools: Current status and leadership implications. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 33(3), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2071873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 252–254). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2023). The role of leadership in smart campus construction: A survey of principals in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 16(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.12345/jetde.2023.123456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition