English Teaching Methods and Pupils’ Performance in Nangako Town Council, Uganda

This study examined English language teaching methods and their influence on primary school pupils' performance in Nangako Town Council, Bududa District, Uganda. The study was guided by the objective: to identify English language teaching methods used in local primary schools. A descriptive survey design was employed, integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The study involved 255 participants, drawn from a target population of 510, comprising 48 teachers, 205 pupils, and 2 education officials. Stratified sampling was used for pupils, while purposive sampling was applied for teachers and education officials. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequencies and percentages, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Findings revealed that 36% of teachers use audiovisual methods, while 20% use the direct method. The study concluded that over-reliance on the mother tongue and grammar translation impairs pupils' ability to develop proficiency in English. It recommends strategic bilingual education and strengthening teacher training in communicative and student-centered methodologies.

English teaching methods, pupil performance, primary schools, Nangako

1. Adunola, O. (2011). The impact of teaching methods on student learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amin, M. E. (2005). Social Science Research: Conception, Methodology and Analysis. Makerere University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hightower, A. M., et al. (2011). Improving student learning by supporting quality teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hu, Y. (2002). Potential factors influencing English learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kibui, A., & Athiemoolam, L. (2012). English proficiency and language use in Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lozanov, G. (2005). Suggestopedia: Theory and practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nila, M. (2015). Direct method in language teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ojera, D., & Bwire, A. (2020). Language teaching practices in Uganda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Shira, R. (2020). English language performance in East African primary schools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Stern, H. H. (2001). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tebabal, A., & Kahssay, G. (2011). The effect of teaching methods on students’ academic achievement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Uganda National Examinations Board (UNEB). (2019–2023). PLE Results Summary Reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Reading Engagement, Reading Anxiety, and Self-Perceived Reading Success among Malaysian ESL Foundation Students: A Descriptive Study
• Teachers’ Perceptions of AI-Assisted Digital Storytelling in Malaysian Lower Secondary ESL Classrooms
• A Speech Act Analysis of Governor Nyesom Wike’s 2015 Inaugural Address