The Eyes of Me: How Congenitally Blind Children Construct Reality

This case study explores how congenitally blind children construct, perceive, and give meaning to reality in the absence of sight. Motivated by the scarcity of Philippine-based research on childhood congenital blindness, the study focuses on the lived experiences of congenitally blind children from Zapatera Elementary School, examining the challenges they encounter, the impact of blindness on their well-being and quality of life, and the sensory, communicative, and social processes through which they understand their world. Using a qualitative case study design, data were gathered through validated semi-structured interviews with the children, their guardians, and their teachers, supported by reflexive thematic analysis. Findings reveal that the children face significant challenges in mobility, environmental navigation, access to visual learning, and social participation. Despite these, they demonstrate strong adaptive strategies, reliance on auditory and tactile cues, heightened curiosity through questioning, and trust in verbal descriptions provided by caregivers and teachers. Congenital blindness was shown to influence their emotional landscape, shaping experiences of dependence, occasional social isolation, and the development of selfconfidence and resilience. The study also highlights how reality construction among congenitally blind children emerges through non-visual sensory experience, consistent environmental structure, language-based meaning-making, and social interaction. This research contributes to inclusive psychological understanding, informing educators, caregivers, and policymakers on more responsive and empowering approaches to supporting blind children’s development, learning, and social well-being.

Congenital Blindness, Reality Construction, Sensory Perception, Lived Experiences, Well-being and Quality of Life

1. Afonso, A., Blum, A., Katz, B. F., Tarroux, P., Borst, G., & Denis, M. (2010). Structural properties of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. spatial representations in blind people: Scanning images constructed from tactile exploration or from locomotion in a 3-D small-scale space. Memory & Cognition, 38, 591–604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alhusayni, F. A. F., & Alsoliman, B. S. H. (2025). Enhancing quality of life: Insights from a family with inherited cases of blindness. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 167, 105159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Almeda San Jose, M. Z., & Pthiaka, H. (2022). A narrative analysis of the experiences of teachers with disabilities in the Philippines. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Facultat de Ciències Polítiques i de Sociologia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Armstrong, D. M. (2023). Perception and the physical world. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Barrett, L. F. (2023, July 10). How your brain creates reality, explained by a neuroscientist. Big Think. https://bigthink.com/the-well/what-is-reality/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bonsaksen, T., Brunes, A. & Heir, T. (2025) Quality of life in people with visual impairment compared with the general population. Journal of Public Health (Berlin) 33, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01995-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brambring, M. (2006). Divergent development of gross motor skills in children who are blind or sighted. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100(10), 620–634. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Brunes, A. & Heir, T. (2020). Visual impairment and depression: Age-specific prevalence, associations with vision loss, and relation to life satisfaction. World Journal of Psychiatry, 10(6); 139-149. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i6.139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bulk, L. Y., Smith, A., Nimmon, L., & Jarus, T. (2020). A closer look at opportunities for blind adults: Impacts of stigmatization and ocularcentrism. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 38(3), 270-283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Carollo, A., Stanzione, A. M., Fong, S., Gabrieli, G., Lee, A., & Esposito, G. (2023). Culture and the assumptions about appearance and reality: A scientometric look at a century of research. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cattaneo, Z., & Vecchi, T. (2011). Blind vision: The Neuroscience of Visual Impairment. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8882.003.0004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. DeCarlo, D. K., McGwin, G., Jr., Bixler, M. L., Wallander, J., & Owsley, C. (2012). Impact of pediatric vision impairment on daily life: Results of focus groups. Optometry and Vision Science, 89(9), 1409–1416. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318264f1dc 15. De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception by interacting. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(2), 535-542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Demmin, D. L., & Silverstein, S. M. (2020). Visual Impairment and Mental Health: Unmet Needs and Treatment Options. Clinical Ophthalmology, 14, 4229–4251. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S258783 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Elsman, E. B. M., Koel, M., van Nispen, R. M. A., & van Rens, G. H. M. B. (2021). Quality of life and participation of children with visual impairment: Comparison with population reference scores. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 62(7), 14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.7.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Faraon, E. S. (2024). Self-Reliance of Blind and Visually Impaired Massage Therapists for Socio-Economic Sustainability. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology, 3(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ferrell, K. A. (2011). Reach out and teach: Helping your child who is visually impaired learn and grow (2nd ed.). AFB Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Guthrie, C. (2016). A pastoral theology of suffering. Reformed Faith & Practice: The Journal of Reformed Theological Seminary, 1(2), 5–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hoffman, H. F. (2020). Quantum causality relations and the emergence of reality from coherent superpositions. 2001.11617. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.11617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hoffman, N. V. (2021). Faith physics: a new theory of everything. Universal-Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Iezzoni, L. I., Rao, S. R., Ressalam, J., Bolcic-Jankovic, D., Agaronnik, N. D., Donelan, K., Lagu, T., & Campbell, E. G. (2021). Physicians’ Perceptions Of People With Disability And Their Health Care. Health Affairs, 40(2), 297-306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kapperman, G., & Sticken, J. (2003). Access to mathematics by blind students and issues related to braille and tactile graphics. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97(10), 628– 631. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kaski, D. (2002). Revision: Sensory compensation: A phenomenon in search of data. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 73(4), 439–443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lanza, M., Incagli, F., Ceccato, C., Reffo, M. E., Mercuriali (2024). Quality of life, functioning and participation of children and adolescents with visual impairment: A scoping review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 151, 104772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104772 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Marques, A. P., Ramke, J., Cairns, J., Butt, T., Zhang, J. H., Muirhead, D., Jones, I., Ah [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tonag, B. A. M., Swenor, B. K., Faal, H., Bourne, R. R. A., Frick, K. D., & Burton, M. J. (2021). Global economic productivity losses from vision impairment and blindness. EClinicalMedicine, 35(100852). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Martiniello, N., Haririsanati, L., & Wittich, W. (2022). Enablers and barriers encountered by working-age and older adults with vision impairment who pursue braille training. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(11), 2347-2362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Millar, S. (2004). Understanding and representing space: Theory and evidence from studies with blind and sighted children. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mitra, M., Long-Bellil, L., Moura, I., Miles, A., & Kaye, H. S. (2022). Advancing Health Equity And Reducing Health Disparities For People With Disabilities In The United States. Health Affairs, 41(10), 1379-1386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Miyauchi, H. (2020). A Systematic Review on Inclusive Education of Students with Visual Impairment. Education Sciences, 10(11), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nickerson, C. (2024). Social construction of reality. Simply Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. https://www.simplypsychology.org/social-construction-of-reality.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Occelli, V., Spence, C., & Zampini, M. (2013). Audiotactile interactions in front and rear space. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 756–770. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Oberes, F., Rabaya, C. D., Rago, A. T., Sasam, C. D. H., & Cabanilla Jr, A. B. (2023). A Meta-Synthesis on the Employment of Visually Impaired Individuals in the Philippines. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(4):1958-1968. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Pasqualotto, A., & Proulx, M. J. (2012). The role of visual experience for the neural basis of spatial cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1179–1187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Pérez-Pereira, M., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2013). Language development and social interaction in blind children. Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Prasad, N. R. (2021). Perception and reality. In V. Kreinovich (Ed.), Statistical and fuzzy approaches to data processing, with applications to econometrics and other areas (pp. 245257). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Qiong, O. U. (2017). A brief introduction to perception. Studies in literature and language, 15(4), 18-28. DOI:10.3968/10055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Renieri, L., Pizzorusso, T., & Cecchini, A. (2024). Imagery without vision: Cognitive and neural insights from congenital blindness. Cognition, 242, 105521. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Roe, J., & Webster, A. (2002). Children with visual impairments: Social interaction, language and learning. British Journal of Special Education, 29(4), 196–201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Sandu, A., & Nistor, P. (2020). Individual versus Social in Psycho-Sociology. The Social Construction of Reality. Moldavian Journal for Education and Social Psychology, 4(2), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.18662/mjesp/4.2/21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Schinazi, V. R., Thrash, T., & Chebat, D. R. (2016). Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(1), 37–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Shpigelman, C. N., & Vorobioff, M. (2019). Romantic relationship and psychological wellbeing: the experiences of young individuals with visual impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(9), 1228–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1661036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Solebo, A. L., Teoh, L., & Rahi, J. (2017). Epidemiology of blindness in children. Archives of disease in childhood, 102(9), 853-857. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Steinkuller, P. G., Du, L., Gilbert, C., Foster, A., Collins, M. L., & Coats, D. K. (1999). Childhood blindness. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 3(1), 26-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Thinus-Blanc, C., & Gaunet, F. (1997). Representation of space in blind persons: Vision as a spatial sense? Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 20–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Vervloed, M. P., van den Broek, E. C., & van Eijden, A. J. (2020). Critical review of setback in development in young children with congenital blindness or visual impairment. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 67(3), 336-355. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Vinter, A., Fernandes, V., & Morgan, G. (2018). Non-visual cognition in blind children: The role of language, memory, and spatial coding. Child Development, 89(3), 950–964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Youvan, D. C. (2024). Reality as data: Understanding perception, information, and the nature of the observable universe. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383621809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zapata, M. A. (2022). Group identity in blindness groups predicts life satisfaction and lower anxiety and depression. Rehabilitation Psychology, 67(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Zell, E., J. E., & Lane, T. (2020). Self-evaluation motives: A meta-analysis of self enhancement and self-verification. Psychological Bulletin, 146(6), 512–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Zhang, H. (2023). Perception and reality: The intricate web of cognitive processes. Journal of Psychology and Cognition, 8(6), 206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being