Can Green Funds Improve Corporate Environmental and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Facing increasing global environmental pressures and China’s carbon emission targets, China is making the transition to a green economy. A key component of this transition lies in promoting corporate green transformation and sustainable development. Green funds are regarded as an important force in driving corporate sustainability. At the firm level, sustainability not only involves the fulfillment of environmental responsibilities, but also requires firms to maintain sound financial returns in the process. However, it remains unclear whether improvements in environmental performance driven by green funds are accompanied by better financial performance. This study aims to investigate how green fund shareholding, in terms of both shareholding ratio and volatility, affects corporate environmental and financial performance in China. Drawing upon a data sample of 2,277 non-financial listed companies from 2012 to 2021, the system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) approach is employed to address potential endogeneity issues and provide robust estimates. Findings indicate that green fund shareholding ratio has no significant impact on corporate environmental performance, yet contributes to financial performance, suggesting that firms can receive financial returns through green funds, but such shareholdings are insufficient to drive environmental improvements. In contrast, green fund shareholding volatility positively affects both environmental and financial performance, indicating that active management or adjustments in green fund shareholdings can drive better overall corporate sustainability outcomes. These results highlight the comprehensive governance role of green funds and emphasize the importance of active fund oversight in promoting both environmental and financial sustainability in Chinese firms.

Green funds; Environmental performance; Financial performance; Sustainable development

1. Abedin, S. H., Haque, H., Shahjahan, T., & Kabir, M. N. (2022). Institutional ownership and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), 567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M., & Matos, P. (2011). Does governance travel around the world? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 154–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aguirre, M., & Ibikunle, G. (2014). Determinants of renewable energy growth: A global sample analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Energy Policy, 69, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aibar‐Guzmán, B., Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., & García‐Sánchez, I. M. (2024). Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 1493–1509. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Akben-Selcuk, E. (2016). Does firm age affect profitability? Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 5(3), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Alias, N., Yaacob, M. H., Rahim, R. A., & Nor, F. M. (2016). Board structure, free cash flow and dividend per share in Malaysia listed firms: An empirical study of interaction effect. Geografia, 12(2), 1-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Alda, M. (2019). Corporate sustainability and institutional shareholders: The pressure of socially responsible pension funds on environmental firm practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1060–1071. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Alqahtani, N., Uslay, C., & Yeniyurt, S. (2025). Entrepreneurial marketing and firm performance: scale development, validation, and empirical test. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 33(7), 859-880. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Arco-Castro, M. L., López-Pérez, M. V., Macías-Guillén, A., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2023). The role of socially responsible investors in environmental performance: An analysis of proactive and reactive practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419, 138279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Attig, N., Cleary, S., El Ghoul, S., & Guedhami, O. (2012). Institutional investment horizon and investment–cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), 1164–1180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Barnett, V., & Lewis, T. (1994). Outliers in statistical data (Vol. 3). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bellamy, M. A., Dhanorkar, S., & Subramanian, R. (2020). Administrative environmental innovations, supply network structure, and environmental disclosure. Journal of Operations Management, 66(7–8), 895–932. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ben-David, I., Franzoni, F., Moussawi, R., & Sedunov, J. (2021). The granular nature of large institutional investors. Management Science, 67(11), 6629–6659. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. (2017). A team production theory of corporate law. In Corporate governance (pp. 169–250). Gower. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 305–333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Cai, J., Huang, J., Yang, J., Liu, M., Fang, W., Ma, Z., & Bi, J. (2025). A better balance: Energy transition and industrial restructuring for a sustainable economy–climate–environment pathway. Journal of Environmental Management, 381, 125265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Chen, J., Meng, W., Dong, Y., & Zhou, W. (2025). Geographic matching analysis between green finance development and carbon emissions in China’s new era of environmental transition. Research in International Business and Finance, 73, 102581. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Chen, L., Johari, J. B., & Said, R. M. (2024). Do green funds contribute to corporate environmental performance? Empirical evidence from China. Transformations in Business & Economics, 23(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Cheng, H., Cao, A., Hong, C., Liu, D., & Wang, M. (2025). Can green investors improve the quality of corporate environmental information disclosure? International Review of Economics & Finance, 98, 103901. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Chi, Y., Hu, N., Lu, D., & Yang, Y. (2023). Green investment funds and corporate green innovation: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. From the logic of social value. Energy Economics, 119, 106532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Chung, C. Y., Liu, C., Wang, K., & Zykaj, B. B. (2015). Institutional monitoring: Evidence from the Fscore. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(7–8), 885–914. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Chung, K. H., & Zhang, H. (2011). Corporate governance and institutional ownership. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(1), 247–273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Dang, C., Li, Z. F., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Din, S. U., Arshad Khan, M., Khan, M. J., & Khan, M. Y. (2022). Ownership structure and corporate financial performance in an emerging market: A dynamic panel data analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(8), 1973–1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Elyasiani, E., & Jia, J. J. (2008). Institutional ownership stability and BHC performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1767–1781. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Elyasiani, E., & Jia, J. (2010). Distribution of institutional ownership and corporate firm performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(3), 606–620. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Feng, J., & Yuan, Y. (2024). Green investors and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104892. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Fichtner, J., Heemskerk, E. M., & Garcia-Bernardo, J. (2017). Hidden power of the Big Three? Passive index funds, re‐concentration of corporate ownership, and new financial risk. Business and Politics, 19(2), 298–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ge, P., Liu, Y., Tang, C., & Zhu, R. (2025). Green bonds and corporate environmental, social and governance performance: Innovative approaches to identifying greenwashing in green bond markets. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 1060–1078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hsu, M. F., & Wang, K. (2014). The level and stability of institutional ownership and firm performance: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Evidence from Taiwan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(sup2), 159–173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Jafarinejad, M., Jory, S. R., & Ngo, T. N. (2015). The effects of institutional ownership on the value and risk of diversified firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Jiang, S., & Yuan, X. (2025). Does green credit promote real economic development? Dual empirical evidence of scale and efficiency. PLOS ONE, 20(8), e0326961. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kapil, S., & Kumar, S. (2023). Unveiling the relationship between ownership structure and sustainability performance: Evidence from Indian acquirers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 413, 137039. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Katan, H., & Nor, F. M. (2015). Institutional ownership heterogeneity and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(12), 176–188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Khater, M., Ibrahim, O., Sayed, M. N. E., & Faik, M. (2025). Legal frameworks for sustainable tourism: Balancing environmental conservation and economic development. Current Issues in Tourism, 28(22), 3693–3714. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Khatib, S. F. (2025). An assessment of methods to deal with endogeneity in corporate governance and reporting research. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 25(3), 606– 630. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Kordsachia, O., Focke, M., & Velte, P. (2022). Do sustainable institutional investors contribute to firms’ environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Europe. Review of Managerial Science, 16(5), 1409–1436. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Lee, H., Yang, D., & Park, H. (2025). Impact of an institutional investor as common ownership on the corporate environmental performance in Korea. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 17(4), 44–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Lestari, H. S. (2021). Financial leverage and financial performance of conventional banks in Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 48(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Li, L., Zhang, J., Bai, Y., & Yang, R. (2024). Public environmental concern and enterprise environmental protection investment: From the perspective of enterprise life cycle. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 15031–15065. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Lin, Y. R., & Fu, X. M. (2017). Does institutional ownership influence firm performance? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 49, 17–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Liu, H., Xiong, J., Hong, S., & Zhou, B. (2025). Social, economic, and environmental development in China through the lens of synergies and trade-offs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 145634. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Liu, M., Liu, L., & Feng, A. (2024). The impact of green innovation on corporate performance: An analysis based on substantive and strategic green innovations. Sustainability, 16(6), 2588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Ma, W., Duan, X., & Tang, Y. (2023). Enterprise sustainable development and green fund concern: The analysis and test of R&D from listed companies in China. Energy Economics, 121, 106654. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Maury, B. (2018). Sustainable competitive advantage and profitability persistence: Sources versus outcomes for assessing advantage. Journal of Business Research, 84, 100-113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Muhammad, A., Cheng, M. C., Bangash, R., & Osińska, M. (2025). The impact of green bonds on firm cost of capital and market stability: A global analysis. Studies in Economics and Finance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Muñoz, F., Vargas, M., & Marco, I. (2014). Environmental mutual funds: Financial performance and managerial abilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 551–569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Mukhopadhyay, J., & Chakraborty, I. (2017). Foreign institutional investment, business groups and firm performance: Evidence from India. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 454–465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Ni, Y., Huang, P., Chiang, P., & Liao, Y. (2019). Cash flow statements and firm value: Evidence from Taiwan. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 71, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Olawale, L. S., Ilo, B. M., & Lawal, F. K. (2017). The effect of firm size on performance of firms in Nigeria. Aestimatio: The IEB International Journal of Finance, (15), 68-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Rahman, A., Arjang, A., & Iriani, N. (2022). Public ownership and institutional ownership on firm value through financial performance. Atestasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(2), 409–425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Ren, X., Zeng, G., & Sun, X. (2023). The peer effect of digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Economic Modelling, 128, 106515. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Rose, C. (2007). Can institutional investors fix the corporate governance problem? Some Danish evidence. Journal of Management & Governance, 11, 405–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Saif Ul Islam, M., Meo, M. S., & Usman, M. (2022). The relationship between corporate investment decision and firm performance: Moderating role of cash flows. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(2), e2445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Sakaki, H., & Jory, S. R. (2019). Institutional investors' ownership stability and firms' innovation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Journal of Business Research, 103, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Samara, G., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2018). Independent directors and family firm performance: Does one size fit all? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 149–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Satt, H., Nechbaoui, S., Hassan, M. K., & Halim, Z. A. (2025). Institutional ownership and firm performance: The case of Morocco. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 18(1), 7–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Saygın, O., & İskenderoğlu, Ö. (2022). Does the level of financial development affect renewable energy? Evidence from developed countries with system GMM and CS-ARDL. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 1326–1342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Szewc-Rogalska, A. (2024). Impact of institutional investors on the financial performance of portfolio companies: Selected aspects. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management, (207), 535–551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Tang, X., Zhou, X., & Kholaif, M. M. N. H. K. (2024). Does green finance achieve its goal of promoting coordinated development of economy–environment? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(4), 9973–10002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Wahba, H. (2010). How do institutional shareholders manipulate corporate environmental strategy to protect their equity value? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(8), 495–511. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Wang, F., Zhou, X., & Gan, T. (2024). Can green funds improve corporate environmental, social, and governance performance? PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0301395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Wang, K. T., & Sun, A. (2022). Institutional ownership stability and corporate social performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102861. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Winship, C., & Western, B. (2016). Multicollinearity and model misspecification. Sociological Science, 3, 627–649. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Wu, T. H., Ting, P. J. L., Lin, M. C., & Chang, C. C. (2022). Corporate ownership and firm performance: A mediating role of innovation efficiency. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31(4), 292– 319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Yan, X., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Institutional investors and equity returns: Are short-term institutions better informed? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 893–924. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Yu, H., & Zhang, J. (2025). Do green investors empower companies to develop sustainably? Finance Research Letters, 79, 107263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Zhang, W., Liu, X., Zhao, S., & Tang, T. (2024). Does green finance agglomeration improve carbon emission performance in China? Applied Energy, 358, 122561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors