Governance and Risk Issues of Foreign Contractors in Developing Countries: Global Research Trend

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends on governance and risk issues of foreign contractors in developing countries, an area that has gained increasing scholarly attention due to the expansion of cross-border construction and infrastructure projects. Foreign contractors operating in developing economies face complex governance challenges, regulatory uncertainties, and heightened risk exposure; however, existing studies remain fragmented across disciplines and regions, limiting a holistic understanding of the field. To address this gap, this study systematically maps the intellectual structure, publication patterns, thematic evolution, and international collaboration networks related to governance and risk issues in foreign contractor research. Data were collected using the Scopus advanced search engine, applying the keyword foreign contractor to titles, abstracts, and keywords. After applying inclusion criteria and restricting the analysis to the period between 2010 and 2026, a total of 530 final documents were retained for analysis. Descriptive statistics and publication trend analyses were conducted using the Scopus Analyzer, while data cleaning and harmonization were performed using OpenRefine to ensure consistency in author names, affiliations, and keywords. Bibliometric mapping and visualization were carried out using VOSviewer, enabling the analysis of author keyword co-occurrence and country-level co-authorship networks. The findings reveal a steady growth in research output, with major contributions originating from the United States, Malaysia, China, and the United Kingdom. Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlights core themes related to risk management, project governance, international construction, and infrastructure development, reflecting the multidimensional nature of governance and risk challenges faced by foreign contractors. International collaboration analysis further indicates strong cross-country research networks linking developed and developing economies. Overall, this study contributes to the literature by offering a structured and quantitative overview of global research trends, identifying influential themes and collaboration patterns, and providing a foundation for future research aimed at strengthening governance frameworks and risk management practices for foreign contractors in developing country contexts.

Keywords

foreign contractors, governance, risk management, developing countries

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. L. Grilo, S. Melhado, S. A. R. Silva, P. Edwards, and C. Hardcastle, “International building design management and project performance: Case study in são paulo, Brazil,” Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 2007, doi: 10.1080/17452007.2007.9684625. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. S. Ullah, D. Xiaopeng, D. R. Anbar, C. V Amaechi, and M. W. Ashraf, “Political Risk Management in International Construction: Evidence from Pakistan,” Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 839–864, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40171-025-00463-x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. X. Zhang, “Social risks for international players in the construction market: A China study,” Habitat Int., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 514–519, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.02.005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. D. Xiaopeng and L. S. Pheng, “Understanding the critical variables affecting the level of political risks in international construction projects,” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 895–907, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s12205-013-0354-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. I. N. Kurukulasooriya, C. U. Amaratunga, B. A. K. S. Perera, and L. D. I. P. Seneviratne, “Enhancing Collaboration in Construction Projects: A Delphi Study on the Convergence of Local and Foreign Contractors,” J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 16, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Y.-H. Ahn, P. Holley, and J. S. Kang, “Risk Management of Exchange Rates in International Construction,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 24–44, 2009, doi: 10.1080/15578770902717550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. A. L. Pedersen, S. Utkilen, P. Wondimu, and O. Torp, “The risk of involving foreign contractors in the Norwegian infrastructure market,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2021, pp. 1196–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. F. Y. Y. Ling and V. T. P. Hoang, “Political, economic, and legal risks faced in international projects: Case study of vietnam,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 156–164, 2010, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. S. Q. Wang, M. F. Dulaimi, and M. Y. Aguria, “Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 237–252, 2004, doi: 10.1080/0144619032000124689. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. A. H. Khan, “The contractors’ perception of risk management in pakistan,” Proc. Pakistan Acad. Sci., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 189–200, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84883861815&partnerID=40&md5=f676fc223e2e0dacbd646315790d9ed3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. A. Verbeek, K. Debackere, M. Luwel, and E. Zimmermann, “Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology - I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators,” Int. J. Manag. Rev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1468-2370.00083. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. D. S. Assyakur and E. M. Rosa, “Spiritual Leadership in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis,” J. Aisyah J. Ilmu Kesehat., vol. 7, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.30604/jika.v7i2.914. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. J. L. Alves, I. B. Borges, and J. De Nadae, “Sustainability in complex projects of civil construction: Bibliometric and bibliographic review,” Gest. e Prod., vol. 28, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Y. C. J. Wu and T. Wu, “A decade of entrepreneurship education in the Asia Pacific for future directions in theory and practice,” 2017. doi: 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. B. Fahimnia, J. Sarkis, and H. Davarzani, “Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis,” 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. G. di Stefano, M. Peteraf, and G. Veronay, “Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain,” Ind. Corp. Chang., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1187–1204, 2010, doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq027. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. G. P. Khiste and R. R. Paithankar, “Analysis of Bibliometric term in Scopus,” Int. Res. J., vol. 01, no. 32, pp. 78–83, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. A. Al-Khoury et al., “Intellectual Capital History and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 18, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141811615. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. D. Gu, T. Li, X. Wang, X. Yang, and Z. Yu, “Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of electronic health and telemedicine research,” Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 130, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer,” Scientometrics, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 1053–1070, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. F. P. Appio, F. Cesaroni, and A. Di Minin, “Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 623–661, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field,” in International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowldege-Based Systems, 2007, pp. 625–645. doi: 10.1142/S0218488507004911. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. M. Welker, Enacting the corporation: An American mining firm in post-authoritarian Indonesia. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85037832998&partnerID=40&md5=d083c6840235dd9c481956496223aab5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. M. Eybpoosh, I. Dikmen, and M. T. Birgönül, “Identification of risk paths in international construction projects using structural equation modeling,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 137, no. 12, pp. 1164–1175, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84855944211&partnerID=40&md5=94702ba500918c03e825acdecb6a739a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. M. Abubakar, Y. M. Ibrahim, D. Kado, and K. Bala, “Contractors perception of the factors affecting building information modelling (BIM) adoption in the Nigerian construction industry,” 2014, pp. 167–178. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84934282256&partnerID=40&md5=e185a8885888dab24884e9b34a347041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. J. Ledbetter, Unwarranted influence: Dwight D. Eisenhower and the military-industrial complex. 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84903092999&partnerID=40&md5=ab6672ceb55b8eb1bd95e661a389d944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. A. N. Javernick-Will and W. R. Scott, “Who needs to know what? Institutional knowledge and global projects,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 546–557, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77949770031&partnerID=40&md5=854731d38decb81c65d56d259ae86a59 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. T. Elyas and M. Picard, “Saudi Arabian educational history: Impacts on English language teaching,” Educ. Bus. Soc. Contemp. Middle East. Issues, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 136–145, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84861221214&partnerID=40&md5=1089485413a4cdd9786d6bf1dd52cc49 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. S. O. Babatunde, S. Perera, L. Zhou, and C. Udeaja, “Barriers to public private partnership projects in developing countries a case of Nigeria,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 669–691, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84947071958&partnerID=40&md5=7d2dc12ddb82a61ff107f924d0301672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. F. Urban, J. Nordensvärd, D. Khatri, and Y. Wang, “An analysis of China’s investment in the hydropower sector in the Greater Mekong Sub-Region,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 301–324, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84874661407&partnerID=40&md5=0bdd51c44bdb9b7f948292d992224f6d [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. B.-G. Hwang, X. Zhao, and G. S. Yu, “Risk identification and allocation in underground rail construction joint ventures: contractors’ perspective,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 758–767, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84949774658&partnerID=40&md5=84b21d4788fa05954a88a129d8d6d97e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. N. Chileshe and A. Boadua Yirenkyi-Fianko, “An evaluation of risk factors impacting construction projects in Ghana,” J. Eng. Des. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 306–329, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84866856360&partnerID=40&md5=3b6c2b71917511f9307dd48737e10290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Governance and Risk Issues of Foreign Contractors in Developing Countries: Global Research Trend

Authors

Article Information

Publication Timeline

Abstract

Keywords

Downloads

References

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles