Regulatory Governance of Small Hydropower in Malaysia and China: A Comparative Study

This study examines the regulatory governance of small hydropower (SHP) as a renewable energy source in Malaysia and China through a comparative doctrinal and regulatory document analysis. While SHP is often presented as a lower-impact alternative to large hydropower, its sustainability depends on governance arrangements that ensure institutional coordination, adequate implementation capacity, financing support and environmental compliance mechanisms. The study analyses the legal and policy frameworks governing SHP development in Malaysia and China, with particular attention to incentive structures, administrative coherence and emerging sustainability standards. The findings suggest that Malaysia’s SHP development remains largely incentive-driven under the Feed-in Tariff system but is affected by fragmented governance and limited SHP specific regulatory safeguards. By contrast, China demonstrates stronger integration between legislation, fiscal instruments and provincial implementation, including evolving “Green Small Hydropower” governance initiatives. The study proposes staged regulatory governance reforms for Malaysia aimed at strengthening SHP sustainability, institutional accountability and long-term legitimacy.

Regulatory governance; Compliance; Energy regulation; Institutional coordination; Small Hydropower Policy

1. Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. International Energy Agency. (2024). Hydropower. https://www.iea.org/energysystem/renewables/hydroelectricity [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. International Energy Agency. (2024).Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/southeast-asia-energy-outlook-2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. International Renewable Energy Agency. (2024). Renewable capacity statistics 2024. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2024/Mar/Renewable-capacity-statistics-2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. International Renewable Energy Agency. (2024). Renewable energy statistics 2024. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2024/Jul/Renewable-energy-statistics-2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hydropower Sustainability Alliance. (n.d.). Hydropower Sustainability Standard. https://www.hsalliance.org/hs-standard [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. International Hydropower Association. (n.d.). Hydropower Sustainability Standard. https://www.hydropower.org/sustainability-standard [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kong, Y., Pang, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, Z. (2016). Substituting small hydropower for fuel: The practice of China and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 660–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; or, why it is amazing that federal programs work at all. University of California Press. Renewable Energy Act 2011 (Act 725) (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Renewable Energy Law of the People’s Republic of China (2005, amended 2009). National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/Special/CombatingClimateChange/200908/25/content_1515301.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sustainable Energy Development Authority Malaysia. (2024). Feed-in Tariff (“FiT”) 2.0 quota applications for biogas, biomass and small hydro resources for the year 2025 [Press release]. https://www.seda.gov.my/feed-in-tariff-fit-2-0-quota-applications-for-biogas-biomass-and-small-hydroresources-for-the-year-2025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Shan Suleiman, & Shan, K. (2016, September). Renewable energy guideline on small hydropower project development in Malaysia. ASEAN Centre for Energy. https://agep.aseanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/04/ASEAN-RESP_RE-Guidelines-on-Small-Hydropower-Malaysia_Sept2016.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Shiji, C., Dhakal, S., & Ou, C. (2021). Greening small hydropower: A brief review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 36, 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100676 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2024). World small hydropower development report 2022: Global overview (consolidated report). https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/unidopublications/2024-04/Global-WSHPDR-consolidated.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2022, March 16). Hydropower explained. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/hydropower/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wan Abdullah, W. S., Osman, M., Kadir, M. Z. A. A., & Verayiah, R. (2019). The potential and status of renewable energy development in Malaysia. Energies, 12(12), 2437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wong, S. L. (2015). Barriers to renewable energy policy implementation: Evidence from Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48, 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Bank. (2021). China: 40-year experience in renewable energy development—Policies, achievements and lessons learned. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/119221626083896086/pdf/China-40-Year-Experience-inRenewable-Energy-Development-Policies-Achievements-and-Lessons-Learned.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Moran, E. F., Lopez, M. C., Moore, N., Müller, N., & Hyndman, D. W. (2018). Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(47), 11891–11898. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809426115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zarfl, C., Lumsdon, A. E., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L., & Tockner, K. (2015). A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquatic Sciences, 77(1), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-0140377-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wiese, K. E., Sovacool, B. K., & Valentine, S. V. (2020). Energy for all? Investigating gendered energy justice implications of community-based micro-hydropower projects. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(6), 829–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1745059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jenkins, K. E. H., Stephens, J. C., Reames, T. G., & Hernández, D. (2021). Energy justice: A conceptual and policy framework. In J. Meadowcroft, B. K. Sovacool, & T. W. Byers (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Energy Politics (pp. xx–xx). Oxford University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, & International Center on Small Hydro Power. (2019). World small hydropower development report 2019. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. https://www.smallhydroworld.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. International Energy Agency. (2023). Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/southeast-asia-energy-outlook-2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Navigating Climate Challenges in Tourism: Sustainable Practices and Innovative Approaches
• Siberia and the Far East: Development vs. Sustainability
• From Potable Water to Drinking Water: A Conceptual Clarification Based on Individual Boreholes in African Peri-Urban Areas
• Traditional Agricultural Equipment’s and Using Techniques of the Santal Tribe in the Context of Tourism Development
• Dynamics of the Development of Natural Gravitational Processes (Landslides) In the Medium-Mountain Regions of Georgia: The Case of Imereti (2010–2022)