A Review of Safety Knowledge Sharing in the Construction Industry (2021-2025)
Authors
Faculty Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty Built Environment, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
Faculty Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100372
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 4803-4820
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-24
Accepted: 2026-01-30
Published: 2026-02-07
Abstract
Despite decades of work on safety initiatives, incidents of safety failure recur regularly in the construction field because critical safety knowledge is not being shared and shared effectively where it matters most, on-site. This systematic review examines the results of 41 studies published from 2021 to 2025 to clarify how safety knowledge sharing is currently taking place and why breakdowns persist. Using the tool PRISMA, the review finds widespread dependence on toolbox meetings, inductions, digital systems, and informal peer learning, but sees these practices as fragile because of 8 entrenched barriers: language and communication issues, poor organisational culture, digital fragmentation, loss of tacit knowledge, resource constraints, project discontinuity, psychological insecurity, and limited transferability across context. These barriers, taken together, negatively affect workers' willingness and ability to exchange functional safety knowledge. The review emphasizes the need for more than just procedures for meaningful knowledge sharing; it also calls for leadership support, a psychology of safety, integrated digital workflows, and mechanisms to retain experiential knowledge in temporary, high-turnover teams. The paper concludes with strategic recommendations for establishing learning- oriented safety cultures, as well as research opportunities, particularly in Malaysia, where empirical evidence remains scarce.
Keywords
Construction Safety; Knowledge Sharing; Safety Barriers; Tacit Knowledge; PRISMA Review
Downloads
References
1. Abdolmaleki, G., Naismith, N., Ghodrati, N., Poshdar, M., & Jelodar, M. B. (2024). An analysis of the literature on construction employee turnover: drivers, consequences, and future direction. Construction Management & Economics, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2024.2337084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ali Mohammed, A., Hamzah, A. R., & Abdul Mutalib, B. (2011). Knowledge sharing in a fragmented constructionindustry: On the hindsight [Review of Knowledge sharing in a fragmented constructionindustry: On the hindsight]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228427834_Knowledge_sharing_in_a_fragmented_construction_industry_ On_the_hindsight#fullTextFileContent [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Afzal, M., & Shafiq, M. T. (2021). Evaluating 4d‐bim and VR for effective safety communication and training: A case study of a multilingual construction job‐site crew. Buildings, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11080319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Al-Suraihi, W. A., Samikon, S. A., Al-Suraihi, A.-H. A., & Ibrahim, I. (2021). Employee turnover: Causes, Importance and Retention Strategies. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(3), 1– 10. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352390912_Employee_Turnover_Causes_Importance_and_Ret ention_Strategies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Alashwal, A. M., & Fong, P. S.-W. (2015). Empirical Study to Determine Fragmentation of Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(7), 04015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000986 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Amit S Ray & Abhijit Sengupta, 2022. "Knowledge exchange under asymmetric information in emerging economies: impact of signals from Indian universities [Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: evidence from U.S. universities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(1), pages 62-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Arifuddin, R., Latief, Y., Wibowo, M. A., Nugroho, D. B., Medina, S., & Fadlillah, M. R. (2025). Causality Model in Developing Building Information Modeling-based Audit Using Knowledge Management System for Construction Safety Performance Improvement. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, 38(8), 1874–1886. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2025.38.08b.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Aromatis, E. and Munn, Z. (2020) JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. https://jbi-globalwiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ashraf, H., Ejaz, M. K., Memon, S. A., Shen, Y., Maqsoom, A., & Sunindijo, R. Y. (2025). Examining a two-step working model of safety knowledge in translating safety climate into safety behavior. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(1), 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2022-0906 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bakri, A. S., Saidan Khaderi, S., & Abd Shukor, A. S. (2022). A Cross-case Analysis on the Barriers to Knowledge Sharing Practices in Construction Joint Ventures. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1067(1), 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Balcerzyk, D. (2021). The Role of a Leader in Contemporary Organizations. EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL, XXIV(Issue 1), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1959 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2003). Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments. International Journal of Project Management, 21(3), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00090-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Cajavilca, E. B., Guevara, F. S., & Alvarez, G. A. (2024). Integration of 4D BIM, PtD and databases to improve OHS and knowledge management in construction. International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.11159/iccste24.145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Chellappa, V., & Salve, U. R. (2022). Safety Knowledge Management Practices in Indian Construction Companies. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649222500496 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Chenchu, M. K., Ruikar, K., & Jha, K. N. (2025). Strategic social network analysis for overcoming knowledge management challenges in construction: an in-depth review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2024-0950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Daniel, E. I., Nwankwo, N., Adah, C., Oshodi, O., Fidelis Emuze, Chinyio, E., & Nnedinma Umeokafor. (2025). An exploratory study into UK construction industry response to digitalised health and safety management. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-02-2025-0095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Desai, V. P., D’souza, L., Singh, A., & Bhadauria, V. (2025). Organizational Elements that Shape Construction Employees’ Approach and Behavior Towards OSH. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.32738/JEPPM-2025-0004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Dirk De Clercq, & Pereira, R. (2024). How overloaded employees can use resilience and forgiveness resources to overcome dissatisfaction and maintain their knowledge-sharing efforts. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-10-2023-4056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Durmus, D., Isaac, S., Carbonari, A., & Giretti, A. (2025). Knowledge-Based Systems in the Era of Large Language Models: A Case Study in Fire Safety Management. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 1597–1604. https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2025/0209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Duryan, M., Smyth, H., Roberts, A., Rowlinson, S., & Sherratt, F. (2020). Knowledge transfer for occupational health and safety: Cultivating health and safety learning culture in construction firms. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 139, 105496. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2020.105496 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Edwin, K. W. (2023). Sharing incident experiences: a roadmap towards collective safety information in the Norwegian construction industry. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(3), 1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2118983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Fellows, M. F., Phua, F. T. T., & Tutt, D. E. (2022). Building bridges: the bilingual language work of migrant construction workers. Construction Management and Economics, 41(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2151022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Fitra, S., Negara, K. P., & Wijatmiko, I. (2024). Improving Knowledge Management Process Using Bim In Indonesian State-Owned Construction Enterprises. Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), 5(01), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v5i01.5774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Hai, T., Yusof, A., Ismail, S., & Wei, L. (2012). A Conceptual Study of Key Barriers in Construction Project [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Coordination. Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5171/2012.795679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Holen, S., Eide, I., & Albrechtsen, E. (2024). Importance of client presence for safety in renewable energy construction and rehabilitation projects. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1389(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1389/1/012032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Hou, Y., Mi, C., & Huang, Q. (2024). Knowledge Sharing as a Safety Catalyst: The Dimensions of Safety Attitudes in Enhancing Sports Stadium Construction Workers’ Emergency Response. Buildings, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123754 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Huang, Y. H., & Yang, T. R. (2019). Exploring on-site safety knowledge transfer in the construction industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Imam, H., Zaheer, M. K., & Sekiguchi, T. (2025). Safety leadership, participation, and knowledge sharing: catalysts for safety compliance. Construction Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12- 2024-0388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Jia, J., & Wu, M. (2024). Examining the effectiveness of knowledge governance mechanisms in mobile messaging groups within construction project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2023-1003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Kasimu, A. M., & Kolawale, A. F. (2019). The Barriers to Knowledge Sharing Practice in Nigerian Construction Firms. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 5(9), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.31695/ijasre.2019.33486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Kupa, E., Adanma, U. M., Ogunbiyi, E. O., & Solomon, N. O. (2024). Cultivating a culture of safety and innovation in the FMCG sector through leadership and organizational change. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(6), 1787–1803. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i6.1165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. L. Jawahar , N. (2005). Factors Influencing Tacit Knowledge in Construction [Review of Factors Influencing Tacit Knowledge in Construction]. The Australian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 1(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Li, X., & Wareewanich, T. (2024). A Casual Model to Understand Psychological Safety Affecting Employee Creativity: Role of Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge Hiding and Organizational Safety Climate. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 5074–5092. https://doi.org/10.61707/eztzn198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Liu, P., Shang, Y., & Jin, X. (2025). A pre-control method in safety risk management of metro construction. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 24(2), 816–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2357194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Luo, F., Li, R. Y. M., Crabbe, M. J. C., & Pu, R. (2022). Economic development and construction safety research: A bibliometrics approach. Safety Science, 145, 105519. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2021.105519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Lyu, S., Hon, C. K. H., Chan, A. P. C., Javed, A. A., Zhang, R. P., & Wong, F. K. W. (2020). An exploratory study of safety communication networks of ethnic minority crews in the Hong Kong construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-07-2019-0368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Martínez-Rojas, M., Gacto, M. J., Vitiello, A., Acampora, G., & Soto-Hidalgo, J. M. (2021). An internet of things and fuzzy markup language based approach to prevent the risk of falling object accidents in the execution phase of construction projects. Sensors, 21(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Mei, Y., Huang, J., Liu, J., & Jia, L. (2024). A Study of Factors Influencing Construction Workers’ Intention to Share Safety Knowledge. Buildings, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020440 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Mohd Nawi, M. N., Baluch, N., & Bahauddin, A. Y. (2014). Impact of Fragmentation Issue in Construction Industry: An Overview. MATEC Web of Conferences, 15, 01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20141501009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Molin, R., & Dahlberg, E. (2018). Managerial Challenges with Knowledge Sharing A case study at a consultancy firm within the construction industry. Handle.net. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/256320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Ni, G., Zhou, Q., Miao, X., Niu, M., Zheng, Y., Zhu, Y., & Ni, G. (2025). What and how influence the safety knowledge sharing of new generation of construction workers in China: a study based on DEMATEL and ISM. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(4), 2160– 2189. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2022-1065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Nnaji, C., Okpala, I., Awolusi, I., & Gambatese, J. (2023). A systematic review of technology acceptance models and theories in construction research. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 28, 39–69. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2023.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Octovianus Bin Rojak, & Yuniorita Indah Handayani. (2023). The Correlations between Language Barriers and Occupational Safety and Health Communication in Indonesia. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 13(3), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v13i3.49980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Pandithawatta, S., Ahn, S., Rameezdeen, R., Chow, C. W. K., & Gorjian, N. (2024). Systematic Literature Review on Knowledge-Driven Approaches for Construction Safety Analysis and Accident Prevention. In Buildings (Vol. 14, Issue 11). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Pedro, A., Pham-Hang, A.-T., Nguyen, P. T., & Pham, H. C. (2022). Data-Driven Construction Safety Information Sharing System Based on Linked Data, Ontologies, and Knowledge Graph Technologies. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Phung, V. D., Hawryszkiewycz, I., & Binsawad, M. H. (2016, October 1). Classifying knowledge-sharing barriers by organisational structure in order to find ways to remove these barriers. IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/KSE.2016.7758032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Rafindadi, A. D. u., Napiah, M., Othman, I., Mikić, M., Haruna, A., Alarifi, H., & Al-Ashmori, Y. Y. (2022). Analysis of the causes and preventive measures of fatal fall-related accidents in the construction industry. Ain Shams Engineering Journal,13(4), 101712. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASEJ.2022.101712 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Sandagomika, N. M. G. H., Sandanayake, Y. G., & Ekanayake, B. J. (2020). Drivers and Barriers of Using Intrenet of Things for Successful Lean Implementation in Construction Projects in Sri Lanka. FARU Journal, 7(0), 12. https://doi.org/10.4038/faruj.v7i0.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Saini, M., Arif, M., & Kulonda, D. (2018). Critical factors for transferring and sharing tacit knowledge within lean and agile construction processes [Review of Critical factors for transferring and sharing tacit knowledge within lean and agile construction processes]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ci%C2%AD06%C2%AD2016%C2%AD0036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Seyis, S., & Özkan, S. (2024). Analyzing The Added Value Of Common Data Environments For Organizational And Project Performance Of Bim-Based Projects. In Journal of Information Technology in Construction (Vol. 29, pp. 247– 263). International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction. https://doi.org/10.36680/J.ITCON.2024.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Shafiq, M. T., & Afzal, M. (2021). Improving Construction Job Site Safety with Building Information Models: Opportunities and Barriers. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (Vol. 98, pp. 1014– 1036). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51295-8_71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Sherratt, F., Thallapureddy, S., Bhandari, S., Hansen, H., Harch, D., & Hallowell, M. R. (2023). The unintended consequences of no blame ideology for incident investigation in the US construction industry. Safety Science, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Staneiu, R.-M. (2022). Psychological Safety as a catalyst for Knowledge Sharing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 16(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Swallow, M., & Zulu, S. (2024). Enhancing collaboration and engagement using virtual reality within site safety planning. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 177(4), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.23.00105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Tezel, A., Dobrucali, E., Demirkesen, S., & Kiral, I. A. (2021). Critical success factors for safety training in the construction industry. Buildings, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Toufighi, S. P., Vang, J., Govindan, K., Lin, M. Z. N., &Bille, A. (2024). Exploring the impact ofuniversitydriven supplier developmentinterventions on supplier performance: a case ofthe garment industry. International Journal ofProductivity and Performance Management, 73(11),355–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2024-0405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Vigneshkumar, C., & Salve, U. R. (2022a). End-Users’ Opinions to Enhance the Process of Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) in Construction Projects. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 231, 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96206-7_48 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Vigneshkumar, C., & Salve, U. R. (2022b). SAFEFORM: A Prototype of Safety Knowledge Management for the Construction Companies. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 231, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96206-7_29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Wahyu Adi, T. J., & Musbah, A. (2017). The Cultural Differences influences on Knowledge Sharing Activities in Construction Project Collaboration. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 0(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2017i1.2197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Wang, G., Zhou, Y., & Cao, D. (2025). Artificial intelligence in construction: Topic-based technology mapping based on patent data. In Automation in Construction (Vol. 172). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106073 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Wang, L., Luo, X., & Li, H. (2025). The impact of coworker guanxi on workers’ safety behaviors in the construction industry: the effects of team identification, team knowledge sharing, and team safety climate. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1659728 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Williams, J., Fugar, F., Adinyira, E., & Agyekum, K. (2024). Inquiry into channels of health and safety knowledge communication across the boundaries of the construction industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2023-0195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Wu, W., Wen, C., Yuan, Q., Chen, Q., & Cao, Y. (2025). Construction and application of knowledge graph for construction accidents based on deep learning. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(2), 1097–1121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2023-0255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Xiahou, X., Li, K., Li, F., Zhang, Z., Li, Q., & Gao, Y. (2022). Automatic Identification And Quantification Of Safety Risks Embedded In Design Stage: A Bim-Enhanced Approach. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 28(4), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2022.16560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Xiaoping, B., & Tao, P. (2021). Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management of Technological Innovation in Safety Evaluation Planning of Construction Projects. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061536 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Xu, X., & Zou, P. X. W. (2021). Discovery of new safety knowledge from mining large injury dataset in construction. Safety Science, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Yao Lartey, P., Shi, J., Jaladi Santosh, R., Owusu Afriyie, S., Akolgo Gumah, I., Husein, M., & Binta Maci Bah, F. (2022). Importance of Organizational Tacit Knowledge: Barriers to Knowledge Sharing. Recent Advances in Knowledge Management [Working Title]. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Yao, Q., Li, R. Y. M., Song, L., & Crabbe, M. J. C. (2021). Construction safety knowledge sharing on Twitter: A social network analysis. Safety Science, 143, 105411. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2021.105411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Zhang, Z., & Lin, K. Y. (2024). Applying implementation science to evaluate participatory ergonomics program for continuous improvement: A case study in the construction industry. Applied Ergonomics, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Zhou, H., Gao, B., Zhao, X., Peng, L., & Bai, S. (2023). Developing a cloud evidence method for dynamic early warning of tunnel construction safety risk in undersea environment. Developments in the Built Environment, 16, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIBE.2023.100225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar