Prehistoric Stone Tool Technology: Flint Use and its Physical Basis

This research paper examines the stone technology of prehistoric humans, especially the use of flint. The criteria for selecting raw materials in the production of prehistoric tools, the chemical composition of siliceous rocks, and their inherent physical properties are discussed here. The mechanism of 'conchoidal fracture', the basic basis of stone tool technology, is scientifically analyzed when a force is applied to a rock. Furthermore, the study describes methods for distinguishing between natural rock fractures and artificial fractures caused by human intervention, as well as basic shaping techniques such as quartering and flaking. Another aspect of this study is identifying the age of a tool through 'patina', the chemical changes that occur on the surface of rocks. Finally, this study emphasizes that archaeology makes a significant contribution to building robust typological models for interpreting past cultural dynamics by understanding these technological limitations and capabilities.

Conchoidal Fracture, Flint Knapping, Lithic Technology, Patination, Prehistoric Archaeology

1. Andrefsky, W. (2005). Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bordaz, J. (1970). Tools of the Old and New Stone Age. Garden City, New York: Natural History Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Coles, J. M. & Higgs, E. S. (1969). The Archaeology of Early Man. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cotterell, B. & Kamminga, J. (1987). 'The Formation of Flakes'. American Antiquity, 52(4), pp. 675–708. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Crabtree, D. E. (1972). An Introduction to Flintworking. Pocatello, Idaho: Idaho State University Museum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Deraniyagala, S. (1974). Some Aspects of Flint Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University (Department of Anthropology). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hurst, V. J. & Kelly, A. R. (1961). 'Patination of Cultural Flints'. Science, 134(3474), pp. 251–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Movius, H. L., David, N. C., Bricker, H. M. & Clay, R. B. (1968). The Analysis of Certain Major Classes of Upper Palaeolithic Tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Odell, G. H. (2004). Lithic Analysis. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pelegrin, J. (1990). 'Prehistoric Lithic Technology: Some Aspects of Research'. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9(1), pp. 116–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Purdy, B. A. (1975). 'Fractures for the Archaeologist'. Lithic Technology, pp. 135–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Semenov, S. A. (1964). Prehistoric Technology: An Experimental Study of the Oldest Tools and Artefacts from Traces of Manufacture and Wear. Translated by M.W. Thompson. London: Cory, Adams & Mackay. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Whittaker, J. C. (1994). Flintknapping: Making and Understanding Stone Tools. Austin: University of Texas Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/1247904/view/pebble-tool [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-06823-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. https://www.google.com/search [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Ecotourism Traffic Correlates and Artefacts Degradation of Sango Shrine in Old Oyo National Park, Oyo State Nigeria
• An Archaeological Study on the Naga Symbol Associated With Tanks in the Historical Period of Sri Lanka