The Implementation of Visual Technological Equipment by Learners with Hearing Impairment in Primary Schools of Victoria Falls Cluster: Challenges and Solutions

The persistent government focus on the provision of hearing aids through the Department of Schools Psychological Services has resulted in the continued use of inappropriate equipment for learners who are deaf in primary schools. This study explored the implementation of visual technological equipment by learners with hearing impairment in primary schools within the Victoria Falls cluster, with specific attention to the challenges faced and possible solutions. The study adopted a qualitative research design. The target population consisted of teachers and school heads from primary schools in the Victoria Falls Cluster of Hwange District, Matabeleland North Province, Zimbabwe. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and open-ended questionnaires, and were analyzed thematically to identify key patterns and meanings emerging from participants’ experiences. The findings revealed that the majority of teachers and school heads held positive perceptions towards the use of visual technological equipment in the teaching and learning of learners who are deaf. However, the study established that most schools relied on audio-based technological resources, which were largely irrelevant and ineffective for learners with hearing impairment. Major challenges identified included limited knowledge and expertise among teachers, misconceptions regarding appropriate instructional technologies for deaf learners, and inadequate professional training. Additionally, financial constraints significantly affected schools’ capacity to procure suitable visual technological equipment such as computers, tablets, and overhead projectors. The study recommended that the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education should prioritize the provision of appropriate visual technological resources and implement continuous professional development programs to equip teachers with relevant skills. Furthermore, it recommended that government policy should shift from an overreliance on hearing aids towards supporting schools in acquiring and effectively utilizing visual technological equipment for learners who are deaf.

Visual Technological Equipment, Hearing aids, Sign Language, Hearing Impairment

1. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alfaraj, F., & Kuyini, A. B. (2014). Challenges of inclusive education in schools: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Education and Practice, 2(3), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alnahdi, G. H. (2014). Assistive technology for students with disabilities: Teachers’ perceptions in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 36–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Charema, D. (2007). Barriers to inclusive education in Zimbabwe: Challenges for learners with disabilities. Harare: Zimbabwe Open University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chireshe, R. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of inclusive education in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 42–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chitiyo, M., & Wheeler, J. J. (2004). Effects of inclusive education on children with disabilities in Zimbabwe. Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 100–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chitiyo, M. (2007). Parental involvement in special education in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Special Education, 22(3), 58–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Edyburn, D. L. (2015). Rethinking assistive technology for education: A human-centered approach. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Eleweke, C. J. (2017). Inclusive education in Africa: Policy, practice, and challenges. African Journal of Special Needs Education, 2(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Flexer, C. (2017). Hearing aids and assistive technology in education for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Plural Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gallaudet Research Institute. (2015). Annual survey of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Gallaudet University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Joel, J., Kochung, E., Kabuka, J., Charles, A., & Oracha, D. (2013). Challenges in teaching students with hearing impairment in Kenyan primary schools. International Journal of Special Education, 28(2), 101–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Johnson, D., Smith, R., & Brown, K. (2018). Teacher perceptions and technology integration for students with disabilities. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Karasu, T. (2020). Learning strategies for students with hearing impairment: Evidence from inclusive classrooms. Journal of Deaf Studies and Education, 25(1), 33–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kyle, F. (2016). Enhancing access to curriculum for learners with hearing impairment. International Journal of Special Education, 31(1), 14–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lidström, H., & Hemmingsson, H. (2011). Assistive technology in learning environments for children with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(5), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.556198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Makalela, L., & Kgware, N. (2019). Teacher support in inclusive education: Challenges and strategies. African Journal of Inclusive Education, 5(2), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Machingura, F. (2017). Technology use in teaching students with disabilities in Zimbabwe. Journal of Special Needs Education in Southern Africa, 18(1), 57–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Marcus, A., Mayer, R., & Fiorella, L. (2018). Multimedia learning in students with sensory disabilities: Principles and applications. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9440-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Marschark, M. (2007). Raising and educating a deaf child: A comprehensive guide to the choices, controversies, and decisions faced by parents and educators. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Moyle, K. (2006). Using technology to support students with hearing impairment. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 27–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mupedziswa, R. (2019). Language access and inclusive education in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Education Research, 31(2), 112–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nkansah, P., & Unwin, A. (2012). Technology integration in special education: A review of current trends. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2), 12–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Obiakor, F. E., & Afolabi, F. (2017). Inclusive education in Nigeria: Policy and practice. Journal of African Education Studies, 6(1), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ogunleye, A. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of technology in inclusive classrooms in Nigeria. International Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 55–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rekkedal, T., Stephens, R., & Shalrilyn, P. (2012). Multimedia learning tools for deaf learners. Journal of Educational Media, 37(2), 101–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sharan, S. (2015). Inclusive education: Global perspectives and challenges. International Review of Education, 61, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sutherland, D., Johnson, K., & Flexer, C. (2019). Technology-supported learning for students with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Education, 24(3), 225–239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Triarini, F. (2017). Visual technologies in inclusive education: Improving learning outcomes for deaf students. International Journal of Special Education, 32(3), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zimbabwe Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2016). Inclusive Education Policy. Harare: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zimbabwe Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2023). Inclusive Education Policy. Harare: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Constitution of Zimbabwe. (2013). Constitution of Zimbabwe. Harare: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Education Act [Chapter 25:04]. (1987). Government of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar