Digital Bidding: A Systematic Evaluation of Electronic Reverse Auction Adoption in Philippine Construction Procurement Management

Electronic Reverse Auctions (eRAs) are emerging as a modern procurement method in the Philippine construction industry, supported by providers with experience across major construction firms, universities, real estate developers, and project management organizations. Research shows that eRAs deliver greater cost efficiency and transparency than traditional sealed bidding, while reducing opportunities for corruption through third‑party facilitation. Despite these advantages, the sector continues to rely on manual, paper-based processes that lack real-time price competition, consistent auditability, and standardized digital procurement guidelines.
This study examines the application of eRAs in construction management and develops guidelines to help industry stakeholders better understand and adopt this method Through interviews and surveys; key themes and implementation factors will be identified and organized into a structured framework. The findings aim to fill existing gaps in procurement practice and promote wider use of eRAs to enhance efficiency, transparency, and fairness in the Philippine construction sector.

Digital, Bidding, Electronic Reverse Auctions, Procurement Management, Evaluation

1. Addy, M. N., Addo, E. T., Kwofie, T. E., & Yartey, J. E. (2023). Predicting the adoption of e-procurement in construction project delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa: An application of UTAUT2. Construction Innovation, 23(5), 1038–1053. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-09-2021-0174Emerald [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Addy, M. N., Sarpong, S., & Djokoto, S. D. (2023). Barriers and enablers to e-procurement implementation in developing countries: Evidence from the Ghanaian construction industry. Journal of Public Procurement, 23(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-2022-0037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Addy, M., Mensah, I. K., & Agyei, D. (2023). Digital procurement adoption in developing economies: A focus on construction projects. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Asmakh, H. (2021). Combinatorial online reverse auction: A framework for application in the telecom industry (Order No. 28543103). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2610115461). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertationstheses/combinatorial-online-reverse-auctionframework/docview/2610115461/se-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anand, D. (2021). Implementation of online E -auction to overcome the problem of corruption with effective and efficient procurement with transparency. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1-6. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/implementationonline-e-auction-overcomeproblem/docview/2622811333/se-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Asian Development Bank. (2017). E-Procurement: Guidance Note on Procurement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Aziz, N. M. (2024). Towards digital future: Unlocking strategies to integrate e-tendering in the construction landscape. Planning Malaysia, 22(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i1.1234MDPI [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Boukef, N., Vlaar, P. W. L., Charki, M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2016). Understanding online reverse auction determinants of use: A multi-stakeholder case study. Systèmes d'Information Et Management, 21(1), 737,103. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/understanding-online-reverse auction-determinants/docview/1827607440/se-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. BusinessWorld Online. (2023). House approves amendments to procurement law on 2nd reading. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://www.bworldonline.com/economy/2023/12/06/562047/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. BusinessWorld Online. (2023). The future of procurement in the Philippines. https://www.bworldonline.com/spotlight/2023/10/26/553936/the-future-of-procurement-inthephilippines/93 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Business World Online. (2025, January 15). The new government procurement act: Promises, problems, and progress. https://www.bworldonline.com/opinion/2025/01/15/646550/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cardoso, A. L., & Biazzin, C. (2020). What is the value of e-procurement for suppliers? The drivers, barriers and opportunities for engaging MRO suppliers. International Journal of Procurement Management, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2020.104926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cheng, J. C. P., Kumar, S., & Teizer, J. (2021). Factors influencing technology acceptance in construction: A TAM3 approach. Automation in Construction, 124, 103562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103562 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chilipunde, R.L. (2013), “Electronic tendering in the Malawian construction industry: the dilemmas and benefits”, Journal of Modern Education Review, Vol. 3, pp. 791-800. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Department of Budget and Management. (2023). Procurement reform bill highlights digitalization, innovation in government's purchase system. https://pia.gov.ph/procurement-reform-bill-highlightsdigitalization-innovation-in-govtpurchase-system/ Dieter Mayr, J. S. (2014, Volume 69). The potential of Reverse Auctions in Allocating Subsidies for cost-effective roof top Photovoltaic System Development. Energy Policy, pp. 555-565. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514000342) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Eadie, R., Perera, S., Heaney, G., & Carlisle, J. (2020). Drivers and barriers to public sector e-procurement within Northern Ireland's construction industry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 25, 100–117. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2020.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gharaibeh, A., Al-Jarrah, O., & Amro, H. (2022). Industry 4.0 in construction procurement: Opportunities and barriers. Automation in Construction, 135, 104–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gharaibeh, A., Alshboul, R., & Alzghool, D. (2022). Digital transformation in construction: Adopting Industry 4.0 technologies for enhanced procurement and supply chain. Automation in Construction, 140, 104261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gharaibeh, L., Eriksson, K. M., Lantz, B., Matarneh, S., & Elghaish, F. (2022). Toward digital construction supply chain-based Industry 4.0 solutions: Scientometric-thematic analysis. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2021-0197MDPI [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Government Procurement Policy Board (GPPB). (2022). Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 9184. https://www.gppb.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. GPPB-TSO. (2024). Transforming Government Procurement with Innovation through Unsolicited Offer with Bid Matching under 12009. https://www.gppb.gov.ph/transforminggovernment-procurement-withinnovation-through-unsolicited-offer-with-bid-matchingunder-12009/94 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gurgun, A. P., Bayraktar, M. E., & Karaca, Z. (2024). An investigation of barriers to eprocurement in construction industry: A fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Construction Innovation. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-09-2023-0162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hanák, T., & Radovan, D. (2022). Assessment of abnormally low bids in public construction contracts: Legal and practical aspects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Construction, 14(3), 04522022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hanák, T., & Selih, J. (2017). Challenges of Electronic Reverse Auctions in Construction Industry—A Review. Economies, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8010013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hanák, T., Doležalová, M., & Radovan, D. (2020). E-reverse auctions in public construction: Perceptions and practice. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hanák, T., Marović, I., & Jajac, N. (2020). Challenges of Electronic Reverse Auctions in Construction Industry—A Review. Economies, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8010013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hanák, T., Šilih, M., & Radovan, D. (2020). Impact of e-reverse auctions on bid prices in public construction procurement: Empirical evidence. Automation in Construction, 114, 103156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Huang, Y. C., Wang, Y. H., & Lee, C. H. (2015). Procurement cost optimization using quantity discount coordination in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(10), 04015030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 12009. (2025). https://chief.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2025/irr_12009_2025.htmlImplementing Rules and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Regulations of Republic Act No. 12009. (2025). https://chief.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2025/irr_12009_2025.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Inusah, Y., Kazaz, A., & Ulubeyli, S. (2025). Barriers to E-Tendering Implementation in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of a Decade and Beyond. Sustainability, 17(5), 2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Koc, K., & Gurgun, A. P. (2021). Stakeholder-Associated Life Cycle Risks in Construction Supply Chain. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(1), 04020107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.19435479.0000846MDPI [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Manila Bulletin. (2023). A future-proof procurement system. https://mb.com.ph/2023/12/5/a-future-proofprocurement-system [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mergel, I. (2016). Digital transformation of government: A framework for public sector digital governance. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mohd Nawi, M. N., Lee, A., Nor, K. M., & Redzuan, H. (2017). E-procurement in Malaysian construction industry: Benefits and challenges. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 291, 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/291/1/012033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mora, M., Melendez, C., & Gonzalez, R. (2019). The risks of digital procurement transformation in Latin America. Procurement Journal, 18(2), 58–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Nanayakkara, S., Rodrigo, M. N. N., & Perera, S. (2021). Blockchain adoption in construction supply chains: A conceptual framework. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(4), 1023– 1044. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0720 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Naoum, S. G., & Egbu, C. (2016). Modern selection criteria for procurement methods in construction. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(2), 309-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-092015-0094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Navarro, A. M. (2024). The Evolution of Reforms and the State of Competition in Public Procurement in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/the-evolution-of-reforms-and-thestate-ofcompetition-in-public-procurement-in-the-philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Nurmandi, A., & Kim, S. (2015). Making e-procurement work in a decentralized procurement system: A comparison of three Indonesian cities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(3), 198– 220. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2014-0040MDPI [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Osei-Kyei, R., Chan, A. P. C., & Javed, A. A. (2024). Barriers to E-Tendering Implementation in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of a Decade and Beyond. Sustainability, 17(5), 2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Pattanayak, D., & Punyatoya, P. (2020). Impact of supply chain technology adoption on supply chain performance: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(3), 902–929. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2019-0106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Pawar, A., et al. (2017). Cost implications of electronic reverse auctions in procurement. International Journal of Project Management, 35(5), 623–635. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Pawar, M. S., Jain, R. K., & Motwani, M. (2017). Benefits and risks of e-reverse auction in Indian construction industry. International Journal of Procurement Management, 10(6), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2017.08774096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Pawar, Prashant V., Behl Abhishek, and Padmanabha Aital. 2017. Systematic literature review on electronic reverse auction: Issues and research discussion. International Journal of Procurement Management 10: 290–310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Philippine Contractors Accreditation Board (PCAB). (2023). Contractor Licensing Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.pcab.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Philippine Information Agency. (2023). Procurement reform bill highlights digitalization, innovation in gov't purchase system. Retrieved from https://pia.gov.ph/procurementreform-bill-highlightsdigitalization-innovation-in-govt-purchase-system/ Procurement in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/the-evolution-of-reforms-and-thestate-ofcompetition-in-public-procurement-in-the-philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Republic Act No. 12009. (2024). The New Government Procurement Act. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2024/ra_12009_2024.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Republic Act No. 12009. (2024). The New Government Procurement Act. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2024/ra_12009_2024.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Republic Act No. 12009: Implementing Rules and Regulations. (2025). https://chief.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2025/irr_12009_2025.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Ruparathna, R., & Hewage, K. (2015). Review of contemporary construction procurement practices. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(3), 04014038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.19435479.0000279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Ruparathna, R., & Hewage, K. (2015). Review of contemporary procurement practices in sustainable construction. Journal of Green Building, 10(2), 139–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Sandor, R. L. (2018). Electronic auctions and market transformation: How procurement technologies reshape competition. Business Horizons, 61(4), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutional theory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 408–414). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Standaert, W., Muylle, S., & Basu, A. (2015). An empirical study of electronic reverse auction project outcomes. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(4), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2015.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Tezel, A., Papadonikolaki, E., & Dawood, N. (2021). Blockchain applications in construction procurement: A systematic review. Automation in Construction, 123, 103517. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Thai, K. V. (2009). International Handbook of Public Procurement. CRC Press.97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Tsai, K., & Chou, F. (2011). Developing a fuzzy multi-attribute matching and negotiation mechanism for sealed-bid online reverse auctions. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 6(3), 85-96. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/developing-fuzzy-multiattributematching/docview/915869252/se-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. UK Cabinet Office. (2016). Government Procurement Service Annual Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Umi Kalsuma, Z. Z., Lee Honga, M., & Siti, N. A. A. S. (2021). Improvement model in Malaysia public sector’s construction industry. Malaysian Construction Research Journal, 12, 271–286.MDPI [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2018). Applying resource-based view to digital procurement adoption: A study of construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(7), 04018052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. World Bank. (2018). Enhancing Public Procurement in Developing Countries. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Yap, J. B. H., Abdul-Rahman, H., & Wang, C. (2021). Critical success factors for public eprocurement implementation in the construction sector of developing countries. Journal of Public Procurement, 21(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-2020-0042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Yap, J., Yang, J., & Tan, C. (2021). Reverse auctions in construction procurement: Behavioral and market insights. Journal of Construction Procurement, 27(1), 13–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Yevu, E., & Yu, Y. (2020). Digital procurement adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons for emerging economies. Journal of African Business, 21(4), 518–536. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Yevu, S. K., Yu, A. T. W., Darko, A., Nani, G., & Edwards, D. (2022). Modeling the influence patterns of barriers to electronic procurement technology usage in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(2), 5133–5159. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2021-0864 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Zhao, N., Ying, F. J., & Tookey, J. (2022). Knowledge visualisation for construction procurement decision-making: a process innovation. Management Decision, 60(4), 1039-1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2021-0051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria