Why Pollution Endures: Geographic Foundations of Environmental Crisis in Russia’s Industrial Heartlands
Authors
Asst. Professor Dept. of Geography, Murarka College, Sultanganj, TMBU, Bhagalpur (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11010079
Subject Category: Environmental Science
Volume/Issue: 11/1 | Page No: 941-946
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-26
Accepted: 2026-01-01
Published: 2026-02-08
Abstract
For nearly three decades, Russia’s industrial regions, especially the far-flung and remote Arctic areas surrounding Norilsk and the vast industrialized Ural region, have been subject to significant and continuing environmental damage; this is true even though there have been periodic national and regional efforts to clean-up pollution and enforce pollution controls. These are areas of significant resource extraction and heavy industry, where the level of airborne toxic chemicals such as sulfur dioxide, the presence of heavy metals in soils and waterways, the effect of acid rain causing forest kill off, and the general destruction of the landscape due to mining and smelting activity all exist in varying degrees. This paper will provide a synthesis of some of the major geographical, historical and technological reasons why pollution continues to persist in these areas. In particular, it will examine how the enduring location-based advantage of having large mineral resource deposits (including large amounts of nickel, copper, palladium and iron ore) in combination with aging Soviet-era infrastructure, long-established patterns of industrial production and harsh climatic conditions have resulted in an almost insurmountable level of environmental harm. For example, the Arctic's low temperature and stable air layers trap pollutants close to their point of origin resulting in limited opportunity for natural dispersal; geographic remoteness also complicates the transportation of remedial materials and the removal of hazardous waste. In addition, the extreme winter weather in the Arctic makes the process of recovering contaminated soils and promoting plant growth and development difficult if not impossible, thus creating continuous cycles of contamination. The study highlights the combined effects of these elements, which explains why previous attempts at mitigating the environmental impacts of these areas through modernization and enforcement mechanisms have generally failed. Finally, the study identifies several important implications for environmental policy, including the need for multi-faceted approaches to addressing the economic reliance on these types of industries and developing adaptive strategies suitable to remote environments. Additionally, the study identifies potential avenues of research into sustainable industrial transition processes and climate-resilient remediation technologies.
Keywords
Pollution, Geography, Environment, Russia
Downloads
References
1. Antoninova, N., Shubina, L. A., Sobenin, A., & Usmanov, A. (2020). Modern aspects of disturbed land reclamation. E3S Web of Conferences, 192, 3019. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019203019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bislev, A., Gad, U. P., & Zeuthen, J. (2018). China seeking Arctic Resources - The Arctic seeking resources in China. Research Portal Denmark, 2018. https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=aau&id=aau-b0965158-6ca0-422a-8e45-f5b18d37a681&ti=China%20seeking%20Arctic%20Resources%20-%20The%20Arctic%20seeking%20resources%20in%20China [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bityukova, V. R. (2022). Environmental Consequences of the Transformation of the Sectoral Structure of the Economy of Russian Regions and Cities in the Post-Soviet Period. Regional Research of Russia, 12(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079970522020022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bjørst, L. R., Glauser, J., Sejersen, F., & Sörlin, S. (2022). Resource Extraction and Arctic Communities. In Cambridge University Press eBooks. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009110044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Christensen, K. (2024). Thawing Permafrost Releases Industrial Contaminants into Arctic Communities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 132(3), 32001. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp13998 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dudarev, A. A., & Odland, J. O. (2022). Forty-Year Biomonitoring of Environmental Contaminants in Russian Arctic: Progress, Gaps and Perspectives [Review of Forty-Year Biomonitoring of Environmental Contaminants in Russian Arctic: Progress, Gaps and Perspectives]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 11951. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911951 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Kuchumov, A., Pecheritsa, E., Blazhenkova, N., & Chaikovskaya, A. (2023). Problems and prospects of economic growth in the context of the environmental component of sustainable development in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. E3S Web of Conferences, 378, 6003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337806003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Langer, M., Deimling, T. S. von, Westermann, S., Rolph, R., Rutte, R., Antonova, S., Rachold, V., Schultz, M., Oehme, A., & Grosse, G. (2023). Thawing permafrost poses environmental threat to thousands of sites with legacy industrial contamination. Nature Communications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37276-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Listrovaya, L. (2025). Environmental injustice in Russia: internal and settler colonialism in the 21st century extractivist empire. Environmental Sociology, 11(3), 363. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2025.2469197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Masyutina, O., Paustyan, E., & Yakovlev, G. (2023). Environmental Politics in Authoritarian Regimes: Waste Management in Russian Regions. Russian Politics, 8(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.30965/24518921-00803002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Miner, K., D’Andrilli, J., Mackelprang, R., Edwards, A., Malaska, M. J., Waldrop, M. P., & Miller, C. E. (2021). Emergent biogeochemical risks from Arctic permafrost degradation. Nature Climate Change, 11(10), 809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01162-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Notes. (2024). In The MIT Press eBooks (p. 173). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15148.003.0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Rodionov, A., Danilina, M., Blagova, S., Godlevsky, P. P., Пименов, Н. В., & Buslaev, S. I. (2020). Improving the sustainability of metal-producing industries in Russia. E3S Web of Conferences, 217, 4009. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021704009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Shevchuk, A. V. (2024). Ecological Aspects of Arctic Development. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 12(4), 128. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2024.124009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Sidorstov, R., Ali, S. H., Scarlett, T., Shah, K. U., Panikkar, B., Trochim, E., Bennett, M. M., Hale, T. N., & Oikonomou, P. D. (2025). Utilizing Arctic infrastructure data for ecological restoration, just transitions, and protection of cultural heritage. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-025-00115-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Tsepilova, O. (2019). Political and socio-economic development of modern Russia: environmental obstacles and risks. Telescope Journal of Sociological and Marketing Research, 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.33491/telescope2019.203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Volkov, A., Tishkov, S., Karginova-Gubinova, V. V., & Kolesnikov, N. G. (2023). Environmental Well-Being of the Russian Arctic Regions: Official Data and Population Estimates. Regional Research of Russia, 13. https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079970523600154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Забелина, И. А. (2021). Interregional inequality in environmental and economic development in the Russian Federation. E3S Web of Conferences, 258, 6013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125806013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Иванова, С. А., & Карагулян, Е. А. (2020). Применение концепции умного устойчивого города в решении проблем пространственного развития Арктической зоны России. Creative Economy, 14(5), 797. https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.14.5.109383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Удачин, В. Н., Williamson, B. J., Purvis, O. W., Spiro, B., Dubbin, W. E., Brooks, S. J., Coste, B., Herrington, R., & Mikhailova, I. (2003). Assessment of environmental impacts of active smelter operations and abandoned mines in Karabash, Ural Mountains of Russia. Sustainable Development, 11(3), 133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]