IJRISS Logo

Navigating the Final Stretch: A Phenomenological Study of Retirable Principals as Curriculum Leaders

Authors

Virgilio Ericson G. Baptista

Ilocos Norte College of Arts and Trades Laoag City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100394

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 5107-5140

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-22

Accepted: 2026-01-28

Published: 2026-02-09

Abstract

This study explored the lived experiences of retirable school heads in the Schools Division of Laoag City as they manage curriculum implementation in the final years of their professional service as basis for the development of a conceptual framework. Utilizing a basic phenomenological research design, the study aimed to understand how these veteran leaders navigate the complexities of institutional compliance, global educational standards, and the emotional transition toward retirement. The participants included five (5) purposively selected school heads, aged 55 to 60, predominantly holding the rank of Principal IV in various junior high schools. Data were gathered through in-depth, semi-structured face-to-face interviews using an aid-memoire to capture perceptual, factual, procedural, and experiential aspects of their leadership. The qualitative data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step phenomenological method to extract significant statements, formulate meanings, and identify emergent themes. Findings reveal that retirable school heads perceive their roles as a delicate balancing act between meeting rigorous Department of Education (DepEd) mandates and establishing a professional legacy. Key themes centered on the importance of instructional supervision, the challenge of navigating external policy shifts, and the critical role of mentorship in ensuring curriculum continuity. The study concludes that the "experiential knowledge" of retiring leaders is a vital asset for institutional resilience. Based on the findings, it is suggested that the conceptual framework be adopted to guide young and incoming principals in sustaining curriculum excellence during leadership transitions.

Keywords

Curriculum Continuity, Legacy-Driven Leadership, Instructional Supervision, Phenomenological Essence, Succession Planning

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Abu Shosha, G. (2022). Employment of Colaizzi's strategy in descriptive phenomenology: A reflection of a researcher. European Scientific Journal, 8(27), 31–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236417203.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alonzo, J. (2023). Exploring the experiences of school heads in the implementation of BE-LCP during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative phenomenological study. SSRN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4454780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Shabatat, A. (2016). Barriers to effective curriculum implementation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1203958.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Awan, R.-U.-N., Awan, M. A., & Shahid, A. (2023). Effect of school heads' instructional leadership practices. International Journal of Research Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375073096_2023_Effect_of_School_Heads'_Instructional_Leadership_Practices [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Azorín, C., & Harris, A. (2020). School leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic: Strategic challenges and long-term implications. Journal of Professional Development, 32(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Beauchamp, G., Doolan, T., & Vratulis, V. (2021). Participatory governance in education: Building collective ownership of the curriculum. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 780–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220945700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bezzina, C. (2022). Leading for legacy: Experienced principals’ perspectives on long-term impact and sustainability. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(4), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Boston, M., et al. (2017). Professional development for school leaders: A study of effective practices. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2016-0105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bubb, S., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID-19 and the impact on primary headteachers in England. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(5), 743–755. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220927739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cherkowski, S. (2020). Principal well-being and the importance of professional fulfillment: Finding satisfaction in school leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 19(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1614702 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cimene, F. T., Du, E. C., & Alonsabe, O. (2023). Navigating the educational landscape: Philosophy, trends, and issues in the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379655243_NAVIGATING_THE_EDUCATIONAL_LANDSCAPE_PHILOSOPHY_TRENDS_AND_ISSUES_IN_THE_PHILIPPINES [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cruz, L. A. (2024). School heads train for curriculum development and supervision. Don Bosco Technical Institute. https://sdb.org.ph/2024/04/09/school-heads-train-for-curriculum-development-supervision/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2022). Effective teacher professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(8), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221095868 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2020). Successful school leadership: Leading, learning and development. School Leadership & Management, 40(2), 99–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1705935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum: Kinder to Grade 10 curriculum guides. Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2023). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. EdWeek. (2016). A global perspective: Bringing the world into classrooms. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/opinion-a-global-perspective-bringing-the-world-into-classrooms/2016/08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2023). Tips for administrators to build and maintain a high-quality school, family, and community partnership program. School Community Journal, 33(1), 7–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Finkel, E. (2012). Principals' perception of their roles as curriculum leaders. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1360925.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Fuller, K. (2021). Gender, identity and educational leadership. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gamala, J. J., & Marpa, E. P. (2022). School environment and school heads’ managerial skills: Looking into their relationships to school performance. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 4(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. García-Garnica, M., Gairín, J., & Gairín, J. (2021). Wisdom-based leadership in educational organizations: A conceptual and empirical approach. Educational Research and Evaluation, 27(5), 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2021.1962278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hallinger, P. (2022). Future of instructional leadership: Retrospect and prospect. School Leadership & Management, 42(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1889495 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). Leading for instructional coherence: The role of sustained communication and trust. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 311–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09367-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2021). Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being: Separating the concepts, combining the benefits. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-072718-015148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kelly, A. (2021). The professional and emotional journey of near-retirement principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(4), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1708473 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Lahtero, T. J., & Risku, M. (2022). Role strain and resilience among school principals nearing retirement: Navigating evolving demands. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1812053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lopez, J. (2020). The Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads: A framework for effective leadership. Philippine Journal of Education. https://www.instabrightgazette.com/blog/the-philippine-professional-standards-for-school-heads-based [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. McNeill, K., Katsh-Singer, R., Gonzalez-Howard, M., & Lopez, D. (2016). Understanding barriers to curriculum implementation. ERIC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi's descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643–644. https://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/26984/1/Morrow_et_al.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Netolicky, D. M. (2020). Educational leadership and the complexities of policy enactment. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 52(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2019.1689238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Nguyen, T. T., Leithwood, K., & Harris, A. (2021). Distributed leadership and school performance: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220919769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. O’Cathain, A., & Thomas, K. J. (2004). “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires: A bane or a bonus to research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4(25). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. OECD. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation. https://one.oecd.org/document/EDU/WKP(2020)27/En/pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. OECD. (2021). School leadership for learning: Lessons from PISA 2018 and the School Principal Global Survey. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Ortanez, D. C. (2023). A qualitative study on the lens of educators about the educational crisis of the trifocal education system in the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369362128_A_Qualitative_Study_on_the_lens_of_educators_about_the_educational_crisis_of_the_Trifocal_education_system_in_the_Philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Oplatka, I. (2022). The field of educational administration: Historical and theoretical foundations. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Palestina, R. L., Pangan, A. D., & Ancho, I. V. (2020). Curriculum implementation facilitating and hindering factors: The Philippines context. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Pietsch, L., & Tulowitzki, P. (2021). School principals as sensemakers: Interpreting and implementing ambiguous educational policies. Journal of Educational Change, 22(4), 513–533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09421-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership: Policy and practice (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/44374889.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Print, M. (2018). Curriculum development: Complexity and challenges in shaping the future. Asia Pacific Journal on Curriculum Studies, 1(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.53420/apjcs.2018.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Retnawati, H., Setyowati, S., & Kurniawati, D. (2016). A literary review on curriculum implementation problems. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 4(2), 204–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1300927.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/researchdesign/toc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Senate of the Philippines. (2019). An act lowering the optional retirement age of public school teachers. https://legacy.senate.gov.ph/lis/bill_res.aspx?congress=18&q=SBN-958 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2020). The effect of transformational leadership on teacher collaboration, efficacy, and student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1640082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Supovitz, J. A., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2019). Instructional leadership and the new work of school administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(3), 423–453. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18799428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Shapiro, J. P., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2021). Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Thessin, R. A. (2019). Empowering teacher leaders through collaborative practices. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. https://ijrp.org/filePermission/fileDownlaod/4/534670012ec88270ecb0f34455166395/1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, C. (2020). Relational leadership: The role of trust and empathy in school effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. UNESCO. (2022). Education sector responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. UNESCO Digital Library. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Zhang, G., Bohley, K., & Wheeler, L. (2017). Global perspective and the implications for school leadership. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 13(2), 10–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles