Application of Effective Training Methods to Achieve Positive Learning Outcomes and to Facilitate Optimum Performance at the Workplace
Authors
Graduate School of Management, Management & Science University, University Drive, Off Persiaran Olahraga, Section 13, 40100 Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Graduate School of Management, Management & Science University, University Drive, Off Persiaran Olahraga, Section 13, 40100 Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Graduate School of Management, Management & Science University, University Drive, Off Persiaran Olahraga, Section 13, 40100 Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100405
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 5279-5290
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-24
Accepted: 2026-01-29
Published: 2026-02-09
Abstract
Transfer of training accorded to employees at the work place is increasingly becoming the focus of contemporary researchers. The intensity of competition in the world of is ever increasing. Adding to the complexities in justifying training expenditure is the intangible nature of the product. Using a systematic literature review method, 45 peer reviewed articles were analyzed to identify key factors influencing training effectiveness. The review synthesizes evidence on how structured training approaches—spanning reaction, learning, behaviour, and results—support sustainable skill development and organizational impact. Many scholars have made revelations on the subject of training transfer and Donald Kirkpatrick (1959) with his four level Kirkpatrick model (KM) has been highlighted for over six decades. Many of these scholars who have expressed views on the transfer of training contend that Models such as Baldwin and Ford’s Transfer of Training and Holton’s Learning Transfer System Inventory are examined to highlight the role of learner motivation, organizational climate, and contextual alignment in maximizing transfer. Findings suggest that integrating evaluation models with workplace specific training design enhances both individual competencies and organizational outcomes. of training transfer. However, there has been no absence of critics of the KM. Notable critics of the KM include Alliger and Janak (1989), Phillips (1996) and Saidi, Fung, Turner and Lim (2024), suggesting that arguments for and against the Kirkpatrick model and the subject of training transfer will continue in to the future too. Mehner, Rothenbuch and Kaufeld (2025) and Alam and Islam (2025) were the last of for many scholars to support the KM. This literature review paper is intended to contribute more on the subject of “transfer of training into workplace behaviour”, to the knowledge base already available in the academic world. The intent of doing so is to delve deeply into a specific area.
Keywords
Training transfer, training methods, learning motivation, learning outcomes
Downloads
References
1. Alliger, G. M., & Janak, E. A. (1989). Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: Thirty years later. Personnel Psychology, 42(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00661.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Angelo, T. A. (1995). Reassessing and defining assessment. AAHE Bulletin, 48(2), 7–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2013). A dynamic integrated approach to teacher professional development: Impact and sustainability of the effects on improving teacher behaviour and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Baehr, M. E. (2005). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University Press of America. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bahl, S., Kiran, R., & Sharma, S. (2024). Training transfer and organizational productivity: An empirical study. International Journal of Training and Development, 28(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (2017). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Baltaci, A., & Balci, A. (2017). Complexity leadership: A theoretical perspective. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 5(1), 30–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bednall, T. C., & Sanders, K. (2017). Do opportunities for learning at work help employees thrive? A moderated meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.09.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Berg, S., Schulte, E. M., & Kauffeld, S. (2023). Transfer projects: Bridging training and practice. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 34(2), 123–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2017). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1060–1089. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Boonchutima, S., & Pinyopornpanich, W. (2013). Evaluation of adult education programs in Thailand. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(6), 54–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Bourner, T. (1997). Teaching methods for learning outcomes. Education + Training, 39(9), 344–348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Botke, J. A., Jansen, P. G., Khapova, S. N., & Tims, M. (2018). Work factors influencing the transfer stages of soft skills training: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 24, 130–147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1987). Achieving results from training: How to evaluate human resource development to strengthen programs and increase impact. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 263–296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Bushnell, D. S. (1990). Input, process, output: A model for evaluating training. Training and Development Journal, 44(3), 41–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Chang, G. (2010). Evaluating training effectiveness: The Kirkpatrick model revisited. Asian Development Review, 27(2), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Chen, S., & Hou, Y. (2021). Exploring effective training methods for organizational performance. Journal of Workplace Learning, 33(4), 233–249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Choi, S. L. (2017). Human resource development in organizations: Training transfer and performance. Journal of Management Development, 36(4), 486–500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Comings, J. (2007). Persistence: Helping adult education students reach their goals. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, 7, 23–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Compton, J. I., Cox, E., & Laanan, F. S. (2006). Adult learners in transition. New Directions for Student Services, 114, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Das, R. (2019). Training and development practices in India. International Journal of Management Studies, 6(2), 101–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Dewiyani, I., & Ferdinand, A. (2019). Active learning methods and training transfer. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 167–175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Dhir, S. (2019). The impact of organizational culture on transfer of training. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 9(2), 43–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Domingues, R., Rodrigues, M., & Falcon, P. (2022). Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s model in modern training. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(5), 455–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Egan, T. M., Yang, B., & Bartlett, K. R. (2004). The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(3), 279–301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Fernandes, C., Mesquita, D., Flores, M. A., & Lima, R. M. (2012). Engaging students in learning: Findings from a study of project-based learning in engineering. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 10(1), 55–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Frash, R. E., Antun, J. M., Kline, S. F., & Almanza, B. A. (2008). Like it! Learn it! Use it? A field study of training transfer in the hospitality industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 7(2), 99–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Galvin, T. (1983). Evaluating training effectiveness. Training & Development Journal, 37(12), 48–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Hashish, M., & Bajbeir, A. (2022). Active learning strategies in training programs. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(7), 629–644. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Holton, E. F. (1996). The flawed four-level evaluation model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(1), 5–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Holton, E. F., Bates, R. A., & Ruona, W. E. (2000). Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(4), 333–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Homklin, T. (2014). Improving training transfer in Thailand. International Journal of Training and Development, 18(4), 250–262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Iqbal, S., & Sheikh, A. (2018). The role of personal traits in training transfer. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(2), 617–635. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Jones, M. (2003). Assessment and evaluation in adult learning. Adult Learning, 14(3), 12–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Kaufman, R., & Keller, J. M. (1994). Levels of evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 5(4), 371–380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Kent, Cancelliere, Cassidy and Kongstad (2020). A conceptual framework for training research, 1-13/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Kiran, R., Bahl, S., & Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing organizational productivity through employee training. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 11(1), 88–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, 13(11), 3–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Kortsch, T., Massenberg, A. C., & Kauffeld, S. (2024). Building supportive learning environments for training transfer. Human Resource Development International, 27(2), 200–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Kurt, S. (2016). Applying Kirkpatrick’s model: Practical implications. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 12–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Lee, S. J. (2016). Adult learners and non-traditional students: The new majority. Adult Education Quarterly, 66(1), 3–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Ma, C., Liu, Y., & Li, J. (2018). The transfer problem in training: A Chinese perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(2), 238–257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Massenberg, A. C., Schulte, E. M., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). Personality and training transfer: The mediating role of motivation to transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(2), 89–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Mehner, S., Rothenbusch, C., & Kauffeld, S. (2025). Transfer of training in contemporary organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 110(3), 456–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Mozammel, S. (2019). Training and development in competitive organizations. Journal of Business Administration Research, 8(1), 45–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Nadiyah, R. S., & Faaizah, S. (2015). The development of ADDIE model instructional design. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(16), 163–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Oh, J., & Johnston, M. (2023). Employee motivation and transfer of training. Human Resource Management Review, 33(2), 100–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Pangaribuan, C. H., Hutapea, J., & Siburian, P. (2020). Transfer of learning and organizational performance. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(1), 223–236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Parker, J., Nitse, P., & Flowers, B. (2001). Assessing student performance: A cross-cultural approach. Journal of Education for Business, 77(1), 15–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Phillips, J. J. (1996). Measuring ROI: The fifth level of evaluation. Training and Development, 50(4), 20–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Randall, R., & Christensen, M. (2011). The role of effective training in employee performance. International Journal of Training Research, 9(3), 175–188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Razak, M., & Zahidi, N. (2024). Customizing training for effective transfer. Journal of Human Resource Development, 38(2), 211–229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Saidi, M., Fung, H., Turner, R., & Lim, K. (2024). Transfer of training in organizations: Challenges and solutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 62(2), 145–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Saxena, S. (2020). The Kirkpatrick model as the gold standard for training evaluation. International Journal of Training Research, 18(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Shen, J., & Tang, C. (2018). How training and transfer influence work performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 29(1), 5–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Stasewitsch, E., Barthauer, L., & Kauffeld, S. (2022). Social exchange and training transfer. Human Resource Development International, 25(3), 310–328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Stasewitsch, E., Dokuka, S., & Kauffeld, S. (2022). Networking behaviour and transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development, 26(2), 151–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Tonhäuser, C., & Büker, L. (2016). Determinants of transfer of training: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 3(2), 127–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Trumbull, E., & Lash, A. (2013). Implementing formative assessment. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Wang, G., & Chang, J. (2017). The relationship between training methods and learning outcomes. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(5), 370–380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Yambi, R. (2018). Assessment and evaluation: Differences and implications in education. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 6(7), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Yamnill, S., & McLean, G. N. (2001). Theories supporting transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 195–208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Young, M., Klemz, B., & Murphy, J. (2016). Online vs. face-to-face training: Do learning outcomes differ? Journal of Education for Business, 91(8), 409–415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Zumrah, A. R. (2014). Transfer of training and job performance: The Malaysian public sector. International Journal of Training and Development, 18(4), 272–287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Zumrah, A. R. (2016). The relationship between training transfer and organizational performance. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(3), 147–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar