Prophetic Ethics and Nation-Building: An Empirical-Theological Analysis of Isaiah, Hosea, and Amos With Reference to Nigeria

Authors

NWORIE Polycarp Chibueze

Philosophy, Religion and Peace Study, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100408

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 5310-5312

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-23

Accepted: 2026-01-29

Published: 2026-02-09

Abstract

Nigeria’s nation-building process continues to be constrained by governance deficits, corruption, social inequality, and declining public trust in institutions. This study examines the major socio-ethical themes of the Old Testament prophets Isaiah, Hosea, and Amos and evaluates their relevance for contemporary nation-building in Nigeria. Using a qualitative thematic content analysis, the study treats selected prophetic texts as sources of normative social ethics and relates them to contemporary Nigerian governance realities through illustrative cases and policy contexts. Core themes identified include justice, leadership accountability, covenantal responsibility, economic equity, and authentic religiosity. The study argues that prophetic ethics offer a complementary moral framework for strengthening governance, social cohesion, and institutional legitimacy in Nigeria. While not a substitute for empirical policy analysis, prophetic ethics can enrich interdisciplinary discourse on religion and development in plural societies.

Keywords

Prophetic Ethics, Nation-Building, Social Justice, Governance

Downloads

References

1. Abdulaziz, Y. (2015). Islamic Ethics and Social Justice. Lagos: Islamic Research Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ake, C. (1996). Democracy and Development in Africa. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andersen, F. I., & Freedman, D. N. (1980). Hosea: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York: Doubleday. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barton, J. (2012). Ethics in Ancient Israel. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brueggemann, W. (2001). The Prophetic Imagination. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Childs, B. S. (2001). Isaiah. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Deneulin, S., & Rakodi, C. (2011). Revisiting religion: Development studies thirty years on. World Development, 39(1), 45–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fukuyama, F. (2011). The Origins of Political Order. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gyekye, K. (1997). Tradition and Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Haynes, J. (2016). Religion in Global Politics. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Iheanacho, E. (2020). Religion and political accountability in Nigeria. African Journal of Political Science, 14(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Joseph, R. (2014). Democracy and Prebendal Politics in Nigeria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Leftwich, A. (2009). States of Development. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Marshall, K. (2013). Religion and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mbiti, J. S. (1990). African Religions and Philosophy. Oxford: Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ukpong, J. S. (2006). Inculturation hermeneutics. Scriptura, 92, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Bank. (2022). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles