English Communication Apprehension at the Workplace Among Private Malaysian Employees

Authors

Lyla Jaffree

Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Faizah Mohamad

Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Alia Julia Ali Jaafar

Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Nur Farzana Rosli

Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.922ILEIID0018

Subject Category: Language

Volume/Issue: 9/22 | Page No: 184-192

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-22

Accepted: 2025-09-30

Published: 2025-10-22

Abstract

Although English is widely used, its role as a non-native language can cause communication apprehension among employees in carrying out their professional tasks, particularly those from the Malaysian private sector. Hence, this study sought to investigate the work-related English language anxiety among the employees through the lens of McCroskey’s (1984) communication apprehension. Specifically, it explored how Malaysian private employees experienced their communication apprehension in their workplace and their coping strategies to manage this apprehension. Three respondents, selected through purposive sampling from different private sector organisations where English is used, were interviewed in collecting the data. The thematic analysis revealed that their English communication apprehension experience revolved around different types of communication patterns, English usage and its role in task performance. The findings also indicated that they employed a range of strategies consisting of their own initiatives and support from their organisations to manage their communication apprehension. It can be concluded that English communication apprehension poses challenges towards the employees’ task execution, although they can be coped with strategically. The result of this study offered a deeper understanding of the struggles faced by private sector employees in using English within professional contexts.

Keywords

English, communication apprehension, workplace challenges, private sectors, coping strategies

Downloads

References

1. Adeyemi, A. S. O., Adekunle, G. M., & Muhammad, R. B. (2017). Assessing communication apprehension and implication for employability among mass communication students. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 22(3), 78-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adnan, N. I., Hakim, M. A., Sasidharan, A., & Abidin, M. (2024). The oral communication skill module: Investigating the outcomes on Malaysian employees’ confidence in terms of fluency. Mextesol Journal, 48(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v48n3-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arellano, L., Alcubilla, P., & Leguízamo, L. (2023). Ethical considerations in informed consent. In M. Radenkovic (Ed.), Ethics - Scientific Research, Ethical Issues, Artificial Intelligence and Education. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1001319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bhalla, S., Nurhidayah Bahar, & Kanapathy, K. (2023). Pre-testing semi-structured interview questions using expert review and cognitive interview methods. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(5), 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2023.5.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Butler, M. M. (2004). Communication apprehension and its impact on individuals in the work place [Doctoral dissertation, Howard University]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Campero-Oliart, A. R., Lovelace, C. T., & Levitan, L. C. (2020). Contexts of communication apprehension and their relation to self-esteem. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 25(1), 42-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cardile, D., Ielo, A., Corallo, F., Cappadona, I., D’Aleo, G., De Cola, M. C., Bramanti, P., & Ciurleo, R. (2023). Communication training: Significance and effects of a preliminary psychological intervention upon an audit team. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dai, Y., Li, H., Xie, W., & Deng, T. (2022). Power distance belief and workplace communication: The mediating role of fear of authority. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052932 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Daud, A., Ras, F., Novitri, N., & Audia, C. P. (2019). Factors contributing to speaking anxiety: A case study of pre-service English teachers. Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 412-422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Felicita, F. M. (2020). An investigation on Hotel Frontliners’ anxiety in speaking English. UKSW. https://repository.uksw.edu//handle/123456789/23718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Freire, C., Ferradás, M. D. M., Regueiro, B., Rodríguez, S., Valle, A., & Núñez, J. C. (2020). Coping strategies and self-efficacy in university students: A person-centered approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 841. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Han, O. (2023). Factors influencing work-related depression, anxiety and stress among Malaysian fresh graduates. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 5(3), 184-198. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajress.2023.5.3.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hignett, S. & McDermott, H. (2019). Qualitative methodology for ergonomics. In R. W. John, & S. Sarah (Eds.), Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology (4th ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Karatsareas, P. (2022). Semi-structured interviews. Research Methods in Language Attitudes. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108867788.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kho, M. G-W., & Ting, S-H. (2023). Public speaking training plan for mitigating oral communication apprehension. Qeios, 5(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.32388/2P2776 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2020). Breaking the vicious cycle of language anxiety: Growth language mindsets improve lower-competence ESL students’ intercultural interactions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Loureiro, M., Loureiro, N., & Silva, R. (2020). Differences of gender in oral and written communication apprehension of university students. Education Sciences, 10(12), 379. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Malik, S., Qin, H., & Oteir, I. (2021). Perceived psychological, linguistic and socio-cultural obstacles: An investigation of English communication apprehension in EFL learners. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 733-752. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mat Husin, M. Z. (2022). English at workplace: A quantitative report on communication apprehension among Malaysian employees. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 6(4), 57-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mat Husin, M. Z., & Khamis, N. Y. (2023). Is average worrying? A mixed method study of Malaysian public university administrative staff’s workplace communication apprehension. LSP International Journal, 10(2), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v10.20202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mat Husin, M. Z., & Khamis, N. Y. (2024). English oral communication apprehension: A quantitative inquiry on Malaysian administrative staff in an educational institution. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 27-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mat Husin, M. Z., & Mohd Radzuan, N. R. (2021). Identifying English language needs among administrative support staff in a Malaysian public university: A preliminary study. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(3), 199-212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. McCroskey, J. C. (1984). The communication apprehension perspective. In J. A. Daly & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (pp. 13-38). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mohd Diah, M. F., Abd Rahman, N., Hussain, S., Mohd Zahir, N. H., & Abdullah, J. (2023). The relationship between gender and communication apprehension among administrative staff in Universiti Utara Malaysia. Jurnal Javanologi, 6(2), 1251-1257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Morris, T. H. (2019). Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. International Review of Education, 65(4), 633-653. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nesaratnam, S., Salleh, W. H. W., Von Foo, Y., Hisham, W. M. W. S. W., Perdagangan, P., Damansara, P., & Jaya, P. (2020). Enhancing English proficiency and communication skills among Malaysian graduates through training and coaching. International Journal of Learning and Development, 10(4), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nyimbili F., & Nyimbili L. (2024). Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies: English Lang., Teaching, Literature, Linguistics & Communication, 5(1), 90-99 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Pabro-Maquidato, I. M. (2021). The experience of English speaking anxiety and coping strategies: A transcendental phenomenological study. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(2), 45-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Salih, A. M. F. Z. (2024). Language barriers and their impact on effective communication in different fields. Journal of Advancement of Social Science and Humanity, 22-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shazly, H. A., Ferraro, A., & Bennet, K. (2020). Ethical concerns: An overview of artificial intelligence system development and life cycle. 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Taherdoost, H., (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tayyab, J., Imran, Z., & Arif, M. (2023). Review of factors affecting English speaking skills among foreign English learners. Global Language Review, 8(2), 487-498. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Van den Bogaart-Agterberg, D. A., Oostdam, R. J., & Janssen, F. J. J. M. (2021). From speck to story: Relating history of mathematics to the cognitive demand level of tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zainuddin, S. Z., Pillai, S., Dumanig, F. P., & Phillip, A. (2019). English language and graduate employability. Education+ Training, 61(1), 79-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles