Hydropower Development and Indigenous Rights in Malaysia: Socioeconomic Harms, Cultural Displacement and Comparative Legal Lessons from Canada and Brazil
Authors
Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Centre for Innovation and Technology Transfer, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-24
Accepted: 2026-01-30
Published: 2026-02-09
Abstract
Hydropower gained high popularity in Malaysia in the context of the promotion of national decarbonisation and renewable energy sources. Nevertheless, the ongoing development of hydroelectric dams on a large scale has resulted in the development of legal and governance issues, especially where the construction of the dams intersects with land, livelihood and cultural integrity of the Indigenous communities. This paper discusses the socioeconomic and cultural impacts of hydropower dams on Indigenous people through the Malaysian legal lens and with some Canadian and Brazilian experiences, as these countries have more defined norms of Indigenous involvement and protection in resource development. Using a qualitative doctrinal approach, the study examines Malaysian legislative and policy frameworks of developing renewable energy and judicial jurisdiction of acknowledging Indigenous customary rights, such as the Adong Kuwau and Sagong Tasi cases. It is a comparative analysis to evaluate the manner in which Canadian and Brazilian legal systems respond to the responsibilities of consultation, as well as how they respond to the Indigenous land protection and consent-based governance of energy project approvals. The results indicate that the existing regulatory orientation in Malaysia is more focused on development agendas and the provision of little procedural protection that can cause displacement, cultural loss and socioeconomic turmoil in the long run among the affected Indigenous populations. The paper also concludes that the application of the compensation-based frameworks in Malaysia is still inadequate when the hydropower development leads to structural damage to the traditional tenure, cultural heritage and subsistence activities. The study uses lessons learned in other countries to recommend legal and institutional changes to empower Indigenous participatory rights, incorporate the standards of consultation in the governance of energy resources and align hydropower development with the principles of energy justice and sustainable development. The paper will add to the existing body of socio-legal research by elucidating the regulatory gaps in the current hydropower policy in Malaysia and providing a form of reform based on rights-based regulation of renewable energy.
Keywords
Hydropower; Hydroelectric Dams; Indigenous Peoples
Downloads
References
1. Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 (Revised 1974) (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adong bin Kuwau & Ors v. Kerajaan Negeri Johor & Anor [1997] 1 MLJ 418 (HC). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. American Rivers. (2021, February 9). The future of hydropower. https://www.americanrivers.org/threats-solutions/energy-development/hydropower-climate-change/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Aspinwall, N. (2020, January 19). China-backed dam threatens Indigenous people in the Philippines. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/1/19/china-backed-dam-threatens-indigenous-people-in-the-philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Berga, L. (2016). The role of hydropower in climate change mitigation and adaptation: A review. Engineering, 2(3), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2016.03.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Berkun, M. (2010). Hydroelectric potential and environmental effects of multi-dam hydropower projects in Turkey. Energy for Sustainable Development, 14(4), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2010.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Brazil: Reject anti-Indigenous rights bill. (2021, August 25). Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/08/24/brazil-reject-anti-indigenous-rights-bill [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Canadian Energy Regulator Act, S.C. 2019, c. 28, s. 10 (Canada). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Cernea, M. M. (2004). Social impacts and social risks in hydropower programs: Preemptive planning and counter-risk measures. United Nations Symposium on Hydropower and Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/sdissues/energy/op/hydro_cernea_social%20impacts_backgroundpaper.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Climate Action. (2018, November 6). New research finds hydropower dams unsustainable in the developing world. https://www.climateaction.org/news/new-research-finds-hydropower-dams-unsustainable-in-the-developing-world [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c. 11, s. 35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Cooke, F. M., Nordensvard, J., Saat, G. B., Urban, F., & Siciliano, G. (2017). The limits of social protection: The case of hydropower dams and Indigenous peoples’ land. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 4, 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. FMT Reporters. (2021, March 22). Orang Asli bantah bina empangan Nenggiri di Gua Musang. Free Malaysia Today. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/bahasa/tempatan/2021/03/22/orang-asli-bantah-bina-empangan-nenggiri-di-gua-musang/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Government of Malaysia. (2011). Renewable Energy Act 2011 (Act 725). Laws of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gwynne, M. (2018). The debate over dams. Viterbi Conversations in Ethics. https://vce.usc.edu/volume-2-issue-1/the-debate-over-dams/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2004 SCC 73, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 511 (Canada). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Harris, M., & da Silva, D. F. (2021, June 29). The war on Indigenous rights in Brazil is intensifying. openDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/democraciaabierta/the-war-on-indigenous-rights-in-brazil-is-intensifying/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM). (2013). Report of the National Inquiry into the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples. https://suhakam.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/NI.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hunt, J. D., Nascimento, A., ten Caten, C. S., Tomé, F. M. C., Schneider, P. S., Thomazoni, A. L. R., de Castro, N. J., Brandão, R., de Freitas, M. A. V., Martini, J. S. C., Ramos, D. S., & Senne, R. (2022). Energy crisis in Brazil: Impact of hydropower reservoir level on the river flow. Energy, 239, 121927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. International Hydropower Association. (2021). 2021 hydropower status report. https://www.hydropower.org/status-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. (2021, September 21). To solve Brazil’s energy and food crisis: Store more water. https://previous.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/210921-how-to-solve-brazils-energy-crisis.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. International Labour Organization. (2025). Ratifications of C169 – Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169). ILO NORMLEX. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:11300:0::NO:11300:P11300_INSTRUMENT_ID:312314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Moran, E. F., Lopez, M. C., Moore, N., Müller, N., & Hyndman, D. W. (2018). Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(47), 11891–11898. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809426115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. MyGOV. (2020). The Government of Malaysia’s official portal. https://www.malaysia.gov.my/portal/content/31186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. National Geographic Society. (2019, May 31). Hydroelectric energy. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/hydroelectric-energy/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Natural Resources Canada. (2025, December 19). Public consultations and engagements. Government of Canada. https://natural-resources.canada.ca/corporate/transparency/public-consultations-engagements [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Oakes, K. (2019, February 11). How we can save hydropower. Technologist. https://www.technologist.eu/how-we-can-save-hydropower/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. (2020). Types of hydropower plants. Water Power Technologies Office. https://www.energy.gov/eere/water/types-hydropower-plants [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Oh, T. H., Lalchand, G., & Chua, S. C. (2014). Juggling act of electricity demand and supply in Peninsular Malaysia: Energy efficiency, renewable energy or nuclear? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Parker, L. (2017). See a massive dam’s significant impacts on tribal communities. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/photography/article/omo-dam-ethiopia-kenya-photographs [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Rahman, S. (2020). Renewable energy: Malaysia’s climate change solution or placebo? ISEAS Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Romich, E., Civittolo, D., & Bowen, N. (2016, June 23). Characteristics of a boomtown. Ohioline, The Ohio State University Extension. https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/cdfs-sed-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Ronayne, M. (2005). The cultural and environmental impact of large dams in Southeast Turkey: Fact-finding mission report. https://www.rivernet.org/turquie/pdfetdocs/turkeydams.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Sagong bin Tasi & Ors v. Kerajaan Negeri Selangor & Ors [2002] 2 MLJ 591 (HC). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Sahabat Alam Malaysia. (2021, November 15). Indigenous customary land rights and the modern legal system (Part 3: Systemic violations require system change). Friends of the Earth Malaysia. https://foe-malaysia.org/articles/indigenous-customary-land-rights-and-the-modern-legal-system-3/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Savic, K., & Hoicka, C. E. (2023). Indigenous legal forms and governance structures in renewable energy development: A review and analysis. Utilities Policy, 84, 101626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101626 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Soukhaphon, A., Baird, I. G., & Hogan, Z. S. (2021). The impacts of hydropower dams in the Mekong River Basin: A review. Water, 13(3), 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Supremo Tribunal Federal. (2023, September 21). STF concludes judgment on marco temporal for demarcation of Indigenous lands [News release]. https://portal.stf.jus.br/noticias/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=514552&ori=1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Survival International. (2019, November 28). Belo Monte dam. https://www.survivalinternational.org/about/belo-monte-dam [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Sustainable Energy Development Authority Malaysia. (2018). SEDA Malaysia annual report 2017. https://www.seda.gov.my/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Sustainable Energy Development Authority Malaysia. (2009). National Renewable Energy Policy. https://www.seda.gov.my/policies/national-renewable-energy-policy-and-action-plan-2009/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Swainson, L. (2008). Compensating for development: Orang Asli experiences of Malaysia’s Sungai Selangor dam. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 49(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2008.00367.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
- Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
- The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
- An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
- The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.