Administrative Challenges in Ensuring Compliance to the 4Ps (Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program)

Authors

Marvel Jude Rufin

Carrascal National High School, Carrascal Surigao del Sur (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100450

Subject Category: Public Administration

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 5790-5809

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-22

Accepted: 2026-01-28

Published: 2026-02-12

Abstract

This study examined the administrative challenges encountered by School Administrative Officers (SAOs) in monitoring the education-related conditionalities of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) in selected public schools within Cluster 1–5 of Surigao del Sur. The program, designed to enhance school participation among children from economically disadvantaged households, relied heavily on accurate and timely compliance monitoring at the school level. Despite their crucial role, SAOs often faced significant workload, limited resources, overlapping functions, and coordination difficulties. Recognizing these operational constraints, the study aimed to determine the extent of administrative challenges, describe the SAOs’ monitoring practices, and assess the perceived effectiveness of compliance monitoring to inform context-specific interventions that strengthen the program’s implementation.
A descriptive research design was employed, utilizing a validated self-constructed questionnaire complemented by interviews, focus group discussions, and document reviews. Results revealed that SAOs experienced serious challenges in terms of capacity and resources (M = 4.003) and workload and role overlap (M = 3.997). Nevertheless, SAOs performed their duties at a compliant level (Overall M = 3.796), particularly in tracking and recording attendance (M = 3.85) and coordinating with the Department of Social Welfare and Development (M = 3.822). Compliance monitoring was perceived as more effective overall (M = 3.966), especially in accuracy and timeliness (M = 4.039). Findings underscored the need for streamlined processes, capacity-building, digital monitoring tools, and stronger inter-agency collaboration. Strengthening administrative support for SAOs is essential to improving the integrity of 4Ps monitoring and sustaining educational gains among beneficiary learners.

Keywords

Administrative challenges, Compliance monitoring, 4Ps Program, School Administrative Officers, Inter-agency coordination, Education conditionalities

Downloads

References

1. Adom, D., Hussein, E. K., & Joe, A. (2020). Descriptive research: A quantitative research design. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 4(10), 248–252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Artacho, R., et al. (2021). Inter-agency collaboration in conditional cash transfer programs. Philippine Journal of Public Administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2021). Complete enumeration in qualitative research: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 123–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cruz, Dela, M., & Dela Cruz, K. (2021). Gender patterns in educational administration. Philippine Journal of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Del Rosario, S. (2022). Administrative monitoring in rural schools. Journal of Educational Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education. (2023). Administrative workload guidelines for public schools. DepEd Surigao del Sur. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2022). Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) operations manual. https://www.dswd.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2024). Compliance verification system report. DSWD Caraga. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2025). 4Ps annual report: Northern Mindanao. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dela Cruz, M., Reyes, K., & Bautista, J. (2024). Implementation of digital attendance systems in public schools [Unpublished manuscript]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. De Guzman, L., & Santos, P. (2018). Administrative roles of school personnel in government assistance programs. Journal of Educational Administration Research, 12(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2020). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20200501.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Galarrita, J., & Nestal, R. (2024). Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program and district school performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. International Journal of Scientific Advancement and Technology, 2. https://www.ijsat.org/papers/2025/25230.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ganzon, I. M. S. (2024). Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program support and its implication to school performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(8). https://ijmra.in/v7i8/31.php [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ganzon, I. M. S. (2025). Challenges encountered by the administrative officers: Apayao context. International Journal of Formal Methods in Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/344606.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2021). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidencebased practice (10th ed.). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mohajan, H. (2022). Descriptive research: A study of quantitative research design. Journal of Economic Literature, 10(2), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Montilla, C., Ramos, J., & Sevilla, P. (2021). Evaluating the impact of 4Ps on student retention. International Review of Public Policy, 9(4), 87–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Montilla, J. D., et al. (2021). Impact of 4Ps on school enrollment in Caraga region. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2022). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 28(1), 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2024). PIDS: 4Ps reaches the poor, but data gaps remain. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://www.pids.gov.ph/details/news/pids-4ps-reaches-the-poor-but-data-gaps-remain [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024). Poverty statistics in Caraga region. https://psa.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ramos, J., et al. (2025). Measuring the impact of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program on health and education in Maangas. IIARI Conference Proceedings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://iiari.org/conference/article/measuring-the-impact-of-pantawid-pamilyang-pilipino-program-onhealth-and-education-in-maangas [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rapista, R., & Paares, Z. (2023). 4Ps compliance support. As cited in Ganzon, I. M. S. (2025). Challenges encountered by the administrative officers: Apayao context. International Journal of Formal Methods in Research. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/344606.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Republic Act No. 11310. (2019). Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program Act. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/downloads/2019/03mar/20190328-RA-11310-RRD.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Santos, E. (2020). Workload management in school administration. Philippine Journal of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Santos, R., & Lapiz, D. (2021). Coordination barriers in school-based monitoring of 4Ps. Journal of Social Welfare Administration, 17(2), 73–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Santos, E., & Molina, F. (2023). Strengthening collaboration among schools, parents, and local welfare offices. Philippine Journal of Community Development, 11(1), 24–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Serrano, A., & Yambao, J. (2025). Administrative capacity building for public school staff. Journal of Educational Leadership and Governance, 15(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Williams, B., Brown, T., & Richards, L. (2022). Descriptive research in organizational contexts. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles