Examining the Nexus among Formative, Summative and Students’ Self-Assessment in Secondary Schools in Ekiti State
Authors
Institute of Education, Faculty of Education, Ekiti State University, Ado – Ekiti (Nigeria)
Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, Federal University, Oye Ekiti (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100475
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 6122-6130
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-24
Accepted: 2026-01-29
Published: 2026-02-13
Abstract
The study examined the nexus among formative, summative and students’ self-assessment in secondary schools in Ekiti State. Specifically, the study assessed formative assessment in secondary schools, examined summative assessment in secondary schools and assessed students’ self-assessment in secondary schools. This study was conducted using descriptive research of the survey type to gather information from a representative sample of the population under study. No manipulation of the variables was involved. The population for this study comprised of 24,983 students in Secondary schools in Ekiti State, as obtained from the department of planning and statistics, Ministry of Education Science and Technology, Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State as at December, 2025. A total of 200 students were selected as sample for the study, using multistage sampling procedure. The instrument used in collecting data for this study were a self-constructed and validated questionnaire titled “Teachers’ and Students’ Self-Assessment Questionnaire” (TSSTAQ)”, which consists of two sections. Section A presented socio demographic data such as students’ age, gender and class, section B 15 items to assess their knowledge on formative, summative and self-assessment techniques. Both face and content validity of the instrument were ensured by experts in experts in Tests and Measurement in the Faculty of Education, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti. Cronbach alpha reliability method was used in ensuring the reliability of the instrument and a reliability coefficient of 0.72 was obtained. Copies of the instrument were administered on the sampled students by the researcher with the help of two trained research assistants. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The research question raised was answered using mean, standard deviation, frequency and percentage while hypothesis formulated was tested, using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at 0.05 level of significance.
Keywords
Formative Assessment, Summative Assessment, Students’ Self-Assessment
Downloads
References
1. American Educational Research Association. (2014). American psychological association, & national council on measurement in education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anikweze, C.M. (2013). Measurement and evaluation for teacher education (3nd ed.) Ibadan: Malijoe Soft Print [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Basera, C.H. (2019). Learners' Perceptions of Assessment Strategies in Higher Education. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research,6(2), 76-81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Black, P. Harrison, C., Lee, C. Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for Learning: putting it into practice. Maidenhead, Open University Press. Retrieved February 18, 2013 from www.amazon.co.uk>books? science of Natures>Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi delta kappan, 92(1), 81-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Black, P., & William, D. (2015). Assessment and Classroom learning, Assessment in Education, vol. 5, No 1.Pilet & Horoks-Actes du séminaire national de l’ARDM–mars,97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Black, Paul & Wiliam, Dylan. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability. 21. 5-31. 10.1007/s11092-008- 9068-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Boud, D and Soler, R 2015. Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(33), pp. 400-413 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Brown, S. (2015). A review of contemporary trends in Higher Education assessment. @Tic. Revista D’Innovació Educativa, 49(14), 43–49 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Carless, D. (2006). Developing Synergies between Formative and Summative Assessment. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Warwick, 6-9 September 2006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Cornelius, K.E. (2013). Formative assessment made easy: Templates for collecting daily data in inclusive classrooms. Teaching exceptional children,45(5), 14-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fong, C.J., Davis, C.W., Kim, Y., Kim, Y.W., Marriott, L., & Kim, S. (2017). Psychosocial factors and community college student success: A meta-analytic investigation. Review of Educational Research,87(2), 388-424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Garrison, C. and Ehringhaus, M. (2016). Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom: Association for Middle Level Education. https://www.amle.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Looney, J. W. (2011), “Integrating Formative and Summative Assessment: Progress Toward a Seamless System?”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 58, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kghx3kbl734-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Masaiti, G. (2018). Education in Zambia at Fifty Years of Independence and Beyond: History, Current Status and Future Prospects, UNZA Press, Lusaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Masaiti, G. and Mwale, N. (2017). ‘The University of Zambia: Contextualization and Contribution to Flagship Status in Zambia’ in African Flagship Universities in: Role, Impact and Trajectory, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mulenga - Hagane, M., Daka H., Msango H. J., Mwelwa K. and Kakupa P. (2019). Formative Assessment as a means of Improving Learner Achievement: Lessons from selected Primary Schools of Lusaka Zambia. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology, Vol. 3 (1), 33 – 54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mulenga, I.M. and Kabombwe, Y.M. (2019a). Understanding a Competency-Based Curriculum and Education: The Zambian Perspective. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology, 3 (1), 106-134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar