Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure; A Review of Literatures
Authors
Department of Accounting, Nile University of Nigeria, AbujaNile University of Nigeria, Abuja (Nigeria)
Department of Accounting, Nile University of Nigeria, AbujaNile University of Nigeria, Abuja (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100477
Subject Category: Accounting and Finance
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 6138-6150
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-23
Accepted: 2026-01-28
Published: 2026-02-14
Abstract
The function of corporate governance in reducing agency expenses is critical. Corporate boards are responsible for overseeing management and ensuring that the interests of principals and agents are aligned. Boards are accountable for the care and diligence that brings financial control to corporate enterprises, ensuring profitability. This paper focuses on a thorough evaluation of the literature on board characteristics and its role on environmental disclosure. board characteristics variables such as board size, board independence and board gender were discussed in this paper. A descriptive research design is used in this study. When picking different types of board characteristics literature reviews, random sampling is used. The review of literature for this study spans the years 2012 to 2021. The time period is chosen for the sake of convenience sampling. The findings shows that majority of the reviews studies shows that board size, board independence and board gender all have a favorable impact on environmental disclosure.
Keywords
Board characteristic, board size, board independence, board gender, environmental disclosure
Downloads
References
1. Abubakar, A. A., & Moses, S. (2020). Effect of Corporate Governance Attributes on Environmental Disclosure of Listed Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 12(27), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.7176/ejbm/12-27-07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics. 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.110772 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ahmad, A. (2015). Lobbying in accounting standards setting. Global Journal of Management and Business, 15 (3), 1–36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Agyemang, A. O., Yusheng, K., Ayamba, E. C., Twum, A. K., Chengpeng, Z., & Shaibu, A. (2020). Impact of board characteristics on environmental disclosures for listed mining companies in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(17), 21188–21201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08599-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Airvisual. (2018). The 2018 World Air Quality Report. Retrieved from https://www.airvisual.com/world-most-polluted-cities/world- air-quality- report-2018- en.pdf Al-Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2016). Board Gender Diversity and Sustainability Reporting Quality. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 12(3), 210–222. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2016.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Akbas, H. E. (2016). The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from Turkish Listed Companies. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 11(2), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/jeb-2016-0007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Aliyu, U. S. (2019). Board characteristic and corporate environmental reporting in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-09-2018-0030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Atif, M., Hossain, M., Alam, M. S., & Goergen, M. (2020). Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption? Journal of Corporate Finance, 101665. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101665 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Baalouch, F., Damak, S., & Khaled, A. (2019). A study of the determinants of environmental disclosure quality : evidence from French listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09474-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7-45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Barreto, M. E., Ryan, M. K., & Schmitt, M. T. (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Braam, G. J. M., Uit de Weerd, L., Hauck, M., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2016). Determinants of corporate environmental reporting: The importance of environmental performance and assurance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 724–734. doi:10.1016/j. jclepro.2016.03.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Bédard, J., Coulombe, D., & Courteau, L. (2008). Audit committee, underpricing of IPOs, and accuracy of management earnings forecasts. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 16(6), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8683.2008.00708.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103-126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Booth, J. R., & Deli, D. N. (1996). Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 81-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Bushman, R., & Smith, A. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Ournal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 237–333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Bretz, M., O'Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321-324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of management review, 28(3), 432-446. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Cheng, E. C. M., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime, and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262– 289. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2006.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Darus, F., & Janggu, T. (2016). Board Characteristics and the Extent of Social and Environmental Risks Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research & Practice, 2016(2016), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5171/2016.150257 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269-290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Darwish, A. M. S. (2009). The impact of accounting disclosure on the environmental performance of the Jordanian industrial companies on the rationalization of decisions and the quality of financial reports. Egyptian Journal of Business Studies - Mansoura University, 31(1).34-49.https://search.mandumah.com/Record/59871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636-1663. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Deegan, C. & Gordon, B. (1996). A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Companies. Accounting and Business Research. 26 (3), 562-683. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Depoers, F., Jeanjean, T., & Jérôme, T. (2016). Voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Contrasting the carbon disclosure project and corporate reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 445–461. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2432-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278- 4254(03)00037-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Gantyowati, E., & Nugraheni, R. L. (2014). The Impact of Financial Distress Status and Corporate Governance Structures on the Level of Voluntary Disclosure Within Annual Reports of Firms (Case Study of Non-financial Firms in Indonesia Over the Period of 2009-2011). Journal of Modern Accounting andAuditing, 10(4), 389–403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Giannarakis, G., Andronikidis, A., & Sariannidis, N. (2020). Determinants of environmental disclosure: investigating new and conventional corporate governance characteristics. Annals of Operations Research, 294(1–2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03323-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Grace, N., & Odoemelam, N. (2018). Corporate Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure Quantity : A comparative Analysis of Traditional and I ntegrated Reporting Evidence. Journal of Accounting and Financial, 4(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201808.0419.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Greiling, D., & Grüb, B. (2014). Sustainability reporting in Austrian and German local public enterprises. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 209–223. doi:10.1080/17487870.2014.909315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Hewagama, G., & Perera, A. (2020). Environmental reporting and board characteristics in New Zealand listed firms. Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ), Australia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management studies. 37(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Hooghienstra, R. (2000). Corporate Communication Impression Management- New Perspectives why Companies engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics.27: 55-68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Issa, S.O., Yunusa, N. & Hamman,A. .M. (2021) . Board mechanisms and environmental disclosure quality of listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria. Gusau Journal of Accounting and Finance, 2(2), 2- 17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Khaireddine, H., Salhi, B., Aljabr, J., & Jarboui, A. (2020). Impact of board characteristics on governance, environmental and ethical disclosure. Society and Business Review, 15(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-05-2019-0067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Kilincarslan, E., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Li, Z. (2020). Impact of governance structures on environmental disclosures in the Middle East and Africa. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(4), 739–763. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2019-0250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Kimball, A., Palmer, D., & Marquis, C. (2012). The impact of women top managers and directors on corporate environmental performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Konrad, A., Kramer, V., & Erkut S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics. 37(2) 145–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Kramer, V., Konrad A., & Erkut S. (2007). Critical mass on corporate boards: why three or more women enhance governance. Wellesley Centres for women, Report in. WCW11, Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for women. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Krüger, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and the board of directors. Toulouse School of Economics. Unpublished working paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee, and greenhouse gas disclosure. British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Loyd, D. L., Wang, C. S., Phillips, K. W., & Lount, R. B. J. (2013). Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Organization Science, 24(3), 757-772. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 553-563. doi: 10.2307/256976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2010). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance. 17, 491–509. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-011-9186-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 206–224. doi:10.1108/jaar-01-2017-0024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Mayer, B., Running, K., & Bergstrand, K. (2015). Compensation and community corrosion: Perceived inequalities, social comparisons, and competition following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Sociological Forum, 30(2), 369-390 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Modiba, E. M., & Ngwakwe, C. C. (2017). Women on the corporate board of directors and corporate sustainability disclosure. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 13(2), 32-37 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Mohammad Rabi, A. (2019). Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v14n2p57 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Nabulsi, D. (2011). The Effect of Disclosing the Environmental Costs in the Financial Statements on the Quality of Accounting Information in the Industrial Companies in Aqaba City. Al Balqa Applied University / Aqaba University College,13-15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Naseer, M., & Rashid, K. (2018). The Relationship between Environmental Reporting and Corporate Governance: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Ng, E., & Thosuwanchot, N. (2019). Board Characteristics and Corporate Environmental Performance: A Meta-Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3421924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Nguyen, L.-T. and Thanh, C.-L. (2021). The influence of board characteristics on environmental performance: evidence from East Asian manufacturing industries. International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Nuskiya, M. N. F., Ekanayake, A., Beddewela, E., & Meftah Gerged, A. (2021). Determinants of corporate environmental disclosures in Sri Lanka: the role of corporate governance. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-02-2020-0028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Oba, V. C., & Fodio, M. I. (2012). Board Characteristics and the Quality of Environmental Reporting in Nigeria . The Journal of Accounting and Management Corporate Governance in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Management, 2(2), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Obasanho, S. (2017). Environmental pollution in Nigeria: issues and solutions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Otuya, S., & Ofiemun, G. (2018). Effects of board globalizing on financial performance of banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 7(4), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2013). Does the voluntary adoption of corporate governance mechanisms improve environmental risk disclosures? Evidence from greenhouse gas emission accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 637–666. doi:10.1007/ s10551-013-1886-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative science quarterly, 17(2), 218-228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. DOI: 10.2307/2231527 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2010). The Role of the Board of Directors in Disseminating Relevant Information on Greenhouse Gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0515-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Rafique, M. A., Malik, Q. A., Waheed, A., & Khan, N.-U. (2017). Corporate Governance and Environmental Reporting in Pakistan. Pakistan Administrative Review, 1(2), 103-114. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53683-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Saleh, M. M. A. (2015). The Role of the Environmental Awareness in the Application of Environmental Accounting Disclosure in the Jordanian Industrial Public Contribution Companies and Its Impact on Investor’s Decisions in the Amman Financial Market.(Unpublished doctoral dissertaton), University of Jinan. Tripoli, Lebanon [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Setyawan, H., & Kamilla, P. (2015). Impact of Corporate Governance on Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Indonesian Evidence. 2013. https://doi.org/10.15242/icehm.ed815026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Tingbani, Ishmael, Chithambo, Lyton, Tauringana, Venancio and Papanikolaou, Nikolaos (2020) Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29 (6), 2194-2210. (doi:10.1002/bse.2495). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Walls, J. L., & Hoffman, A. J. (2013). Exceptional boards: Environmental experience and positive deviance from institutional norms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 253-271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms‟ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-004-1107-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Wilmshurst, T.D. & Frost, G.R. (2000). Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Test of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. Vol.13 (1) pp.10-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
75. Yasrah, M. M. S. (2018). The Effect of Stakeholder pressure on the level of environmental disclosure in the industrial public shareholder companies listed in Amman stock Exchange (Unpublished Master's thesis). Jerash University, Jordan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
76. Yane D. A. (2020). Board gender diversity, sustainability disclosure and firm value: evidence in Indonesia. Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 23(1), 156-167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]