Technology Integration in Teaching and Learning: A Descriptive Study of Technology and Vocational Education (TVE) Teachers in Surigao Del Sur, Philippines

Technology integration has become increasingly central to teaching, learning, and workforce preparation in Technology and Vocational Education (TVE). This study examined secondary-level TVE teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching and learning in Surigao del Sur, Philippines, focusing on four dimensions: technology infrastructure, pedagogical integration, student engagement and skills acquisition, and workforce readiness and employability. Using a descriptive quantitative design, data were collected from 60 purposively selected TVE teachers in public high schools through a validated structured questionnaire. Results indicate generally favorable perceptions of technology integration, with stronger ratings for pedagogical integration (M = 4.40) and student engagement and skills acquisition (M = 4.40). Technology infrastructure (M = 4.00) and workforce readiness and employability (M = 4.20) were rated at the agree level, with greater variability in infrastructure-related indicators, suggesting uneven access to resources and support across schools. Overall, the findings suggest that while teachers perceive technology as well integrated into instructional practices, institutional conditions and industry alignment remain inconsistent. The study highlights the importance of targeted infrastructure planning, technical support, and professional development to support more equitable and context-responsive technology integration in TVE. These findings contribute context-specific evidence to discussions on technology use in vocational education in developing regions.

Technology Integration, Vocational Education, Pedagogical Innovation, Student Engagement

1. Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. DepEd. (2020). Department of Education ICT policies and curriculum guidelines. Department of Education, Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Duan, S., Exter, M., & Li, Q. (2024). In their ideal future, are preservice teachers willing to integrate technology in their teaching and why? TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00978-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ekrem Recep, C. (2021). Technology use and active learning in classrooms: Teacher perspectives. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7345–7363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10512-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Escudero Pérez, I., García Blanco, M. M., & Sánchez García, V. (2009). Nuevos espacios de enseñanza-aprendizaje en la formación inicial de profesores de Primaria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fernández Batanero, J. M., & Bermejo Campos, M. (2020). University professors’ professional identity and organizational context in technology integration. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21, 15–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Francis, A., & Vassallo, A. (2022). Digital literacy and teacher readiness for technology integration. Computers & Education Open, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hsu, Y.-S., Ching, Y.-H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2020). Elementary teachers’ views about teaching design, engineering, and technology (DET). Journal of STEM Education Research, 3, 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jamil, M. K., Aslam, M., & Shahzad, A. R. (2024). Technology integration in teaching and learning: Exploring prospective teachers’ perceptions, practices and challenges. Indus Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v2i2.346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nugroho, A., Haghegh, M., & Triana, Y. (2021). Emergency Remote Teaching amidst Global Pandemic: Voices of Indonesian EFL Teachers. Peer-reviewed journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Raja, G. P., Saravanakumar, A. R., & Sivakumar, P. (2023). Perceptions and prospects: Technology-enabled teacher education in the digital age. EJTA Studies. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(5).84 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Surayya, A., & Asrobi, N. (2020). Tracing technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) on EFL writing instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 105–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Surayya, S., & Asrobi, M. (2020). Tracing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) on Practical EFL Teachers in Writing Context. Peer-reviewed journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. TESDA. (2022). Technology-enhanced instruction and workforce skills framework. Technical Education and Skills Development Authority. https://www.tesda.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2020). STEM integration in teacher professional development: Perceptions and classroom practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31, 45–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Curriculum Improvement Needs of Electrical and Electronics Technology Education Programme for Sustainable Self-Employment of Graduates of Nigeria Universities
• Adoption of RFID Technology in Educational Systems: A Systematic Review of Benefits and Constraints