Self-Help Groups as Gendered Institutions in Emerging Rural Markets: An Institutional–Capability Perspective from Jharkhand, India

In emerging market economies, persistent gender asymmetries in access to finance, productive assets, and decision-making authority continue to constrain inclusive development. Conventional market mechanisms and state-led interventions often remain inadequate in addressing these structural exclusions, particularly in rural and tribal regions. This paper conceptualizes Self-Help Groups (SHGs) as gendered grassroots institutions that mediate between informal social structures and formal financial systems in emerging rural markets. Using empirical evidence from Bokaro district in Jharkhand, India, the study examines how SHGs reshape women’s economic capabilities, financial agency, and social positioning within households and community institutions. Drawing on a mixed-methods research design, quantitative indicators of empowerment were analysed using SPSS, while qualitative narratives were thematically examined using NVivo to capture process-oriented dimensions of agency and institutional interaction. The findings reveal that SHGs extend far beyond microfinance functions, operating as enabling institutions that discipline financial behaviour, facilitate collective risk-sharing, and expand women’s substantive freedoms. By embedding SHGs within an institutional–capability framework, the paper contributes to emerging markets scholarship by offering a nuanced understanding of women-centric development pathways in peripheral market environments.

Self-Help Groups; Gendered Institutions

1. Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.4.1051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. World Bank. (2020). Women, business and the law 2020. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agarwal, B. (2018). Gender equality, food security and the sustainable development goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.07.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Swain, R. B., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2009). Does microfinance empower women? Evidence from self-help groups in India. International Review of Applied Economics, 23(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170903007540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Swain, R. B., & Varghese, A. (2009). Does self-help group participation lead to asset creation? World Development, 37(10), 1674–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.01.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mayoux, L. (2001). Tackling the down side: Social capital, women’s empowerment and micro-finance in Cameroon. Development and Change, 32(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Agarwal, B. (2010). Gender and green governance: The political economy of women’s presence within and beyond community forestry. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Government of Jharkhand. (2021). Jharkhand economic survey 2020–21. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of Jharkhand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mahmud, S., Shah, N. M., & Becker, S. (2012). Measurement of women’s empowerment in rural Bangladesh. World Development, 40(3), 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.08.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Panda, P. (2009). Women’s collective action and sustainable water management: Case of SEWA. World Development, 37(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.02.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. NABARD. (2022). Status of microfinance in India 2021–22. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar