Ethical Concerns on Digital Innovations of the Philippine Carabao Center in Region III: Basis for an Ethical and Inclusive Digital Governance Framework for Farmers’ Cooperative and Association
Authors
Polytechnic University of the Philippines Open University System (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100518
Subject Category: Social Science
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 6707-6722
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-28
Accepted: 2026-02-02
Published: 2026-02-16
Abstract
This study investigated the ethical concerns on digital innovation of the Philippine Carabao Center and anchored on the Ethical Framework for Public Sector Innovation (OECD, 2019), it examined how technology-driven service delivery aligns with the ethical principles of fairness, accountability, and inclusivity. By using a descriptive quantitative research design, data were collected from 118 farmer-members representing five farmers’ cooperatives and associations. Findings revealed that respondents perceived PCC’s digital initiatives, particularly the iREB Dashboard as highly accessible, transparent, and accountable. Ethical considerations such as data privacy, digital equity, and informed consent were generally upheld, reflecting that PCC adheres to responsible data management and promotes inclusivity among its users. However, issues related to connectivity and varying digital literacy levels among marginalized groups remain barriers to full participation in digital governance. This study concludes that while digital transformation enhances efficiency and transparency in public administration, equitable access and ethical safeguards are vital to achieving sustainable and inclusive governance. Recommendations were proposed to strengthen ethical policies, expanding capacity-building programs, and digital literacy programs to bridge the remaining gaps in accessibility and participation among farmers’ cooperatives and associations.
Keywords
accessibility, data privacy, digital innovation, ethical concerns
Downloads
References
1. Atske, S., & Atske, S. (2024b, August 6). Experts say the ‘New normal’ in 2025 will be far more Tech-Driven, presenting more big challenges. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/02/18/experts-say-the-new-normal-in-2025-will-be-far-more-tech-driven-presenting-more-big-challenges/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Berenjestanaki, M. H., Barzegar, H. R., Ioini, N. E., & Pahl, C. (2023). Blockchain-Based E-Voting Systems: A Technology review. Electronics, 13(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13010017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. CHED. (2022). National Higher Education Research Agenda (NHERA) 2022–2028. Commission on Higher Education. https://ched.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and public administration: Understanding actors, governance, and policy from micro, meso, and macro perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767241272921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Dhirani, L. L., Mukhtiar, N., Chowdhry, B. S., & Newe, T. (2023a). Ethical Dilemmas and Privacy Issues in Emerging Technologies: A review. Sensors, 23(3), 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Hayes, A. (2024, June 27). Descriptive Statistics: definition, overview, types, and examples. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/descriptive_statistics.asp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. National Economic and Development Authority. (2022). Philippines Voluntary National Review on the Sustainable Development Goals. NEDA. https://www.neda.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019, May 22). Declaration on Public Sector Innovation (OECD Legal Instruments, No. OECD/LEGAL/0450). OECD. Retrieved from https://oecd-opsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/OECD-Declaration-on-Public-Sector-Innovation-English.pdf Observ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Philippine Carabao Center. (2023). Annual Report 2023. Department of Agriculture–Philippine Carabao Center. https://www.pcc.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Digital strategy 2022–2025. UNDP. https://www.undp.org/digital/Digital-Strategy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar