From Isolation to Access: Impacts of Rural Road Rehabilitation on Market Accessibility and Mobility in Nyimba and Chibombo Districts, Zambia

Authors

Grant Mulenga

School of Post Graduate Studies - PhD Candidate, University of Lusaka (Zambia)

Erastus Misheng’u Mwanaumo

Professor & Director, Directorate of Research and Development, University of Zambia, Lusaka (Zambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100523

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 6766-6786

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-29

Accepted: 2026-02-04

Published: 2026-02-16

Abstract

Rural roads are widely recognised as a foundation for inclusive rural development, yet evidence on how rehabilitation shapes everyday mobility and market accessibility at the district level remains limited. This paper examines and compares the intermediate impacts of rural road rehabilitation under the Zambia Improved Rural Connectivity Project regarding market accessibility and mobility for small-scale farmers in two contrasting districts, Nyimba and Chibombo. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, this comparative study combines survey data from 372 households located along rehabilitated feeder roads with focus group discussions, key informant interviews and basic GIS analysis. It analyses changes in main modes of transport, travel time to the BOMA and markets, frequency and purpose of trips and perceived ease of access to key services. The findings show that feeder road rehabilitation under the Improved Rural Connectivity Project significantly reduced travel times to the BOMA and markets, increased the share of households who are able to reach key destinations within 90 minutes and improved perceived ease of travel for more than 70% of respondents. In Chibombo, mobility is predominantly motorised, while in Nyimba, intermediate means of transport such as bicycles and motorcycles remain central alongside walking. Across both districts, improved roads have enabled more frequent trips to markets, health facilities and schools, but benefits are unevenly distributed. Households further from the road corridor, poorer households and some female-headed households continue to face cost and service-related constraints. The paper concludes that rural road rehabilitation is a necessary but not sufficient condition for inclusive mobility, and argues for complementary investments in affordable rural transport services, last-mile links and equity-focused planning.

Keywords

Rural roads; Market accessibility; Rural mobility; Small-scale farmers; Zambia

Downloads

References

1. Agholor, A. I., Ogujiuba, K., & Shongwe, I. N. (2023). Determinants of Small-Scale Farmers' Access to Agricultural Markets in South Africa. Agricultural Science and Technology, 15(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bonsu, H. O., Tanko, A. G., & Gyambea, R. (2025). Infrastructure and Inclusive Growth: Examining Road Development and Rural Transformation in Emerging Economies. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 45-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Friedmann, J. (1966). Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. GRZ. (2022). Eighth National Development Plan (8NDP), 2022–2026. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Njenga, M. & Opiyo, R. (2021). Feeder Roads and Market Integration in Kenya’s Agricultural Corridors. East African Journal of Development Studies, 8(3), pp.212–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Nura A.Y, Bawa D.B, & Sani, M. H. (2022). Socio-economic Impact of Rural Road Infrastructure by African Development Bank Community Based Agriculture and Rural Development Project in Selected States of Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, 2(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Olagunju, O. (2022). Impact of rural transportation networks on farmers’ income in Ilaje Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 55(1), 9–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Parr, J.B. (2002). Missing Elements in the Analysis of Agglomeration Economies. International Regional Science Review, 25(2), pp. 151–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Parr, J.B. (2002). Missing Elements in the Analysis of Agglomeration Economies. International Regional Science Review, 25(2), pp. 151–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Savić, B., Petrović, M., & Vasiljević, Z. (2020). The Impact of Transportation Costs on Economic Performances in Crop Production. Economic of Agriculture, 67(3), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2003683S [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper 72, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Stifel, D. and Minten, B. (2017). Market Access, Well-Being, and Nutrition: Evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 90, Pp. 229–241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tamene, L. & Megento, T. (2019). Transport infrastructure and small-scale market access: Evidence from Ethiopia. African Journal of Rural Development, 6(1), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Takada, S., Morikawa, S., Idei, R., & Kato, H. (2021). Impacts of improvements in rural roads on household income through the enhancement of market accessibility in rural areas of Cambodia. Transportation, 48(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10150-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tembo, S., & Chapoto, A. (2019). Constraints to Agricultural Technology Adoption in Zambia. Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI) Working Paper No. 136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tembo, S., and Chapoto, A. (2019). The Productivity and Risk Implications of Improved Market Access for Zambian Maize Smallholders. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Vandercasteelen, J., Minten, B., Swinnen, J., & Alemu, T. (2018). Big Cities, Small Towns, and Poor Farmers: Evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 106, Pp. 393–406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Bank. (2009). World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. World Bank. (2017). Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) Zambia: Project Appraisal Document. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zamstats. (2022). Living Conditions Monitoring Survey (LCMS). Lusaka: Zambia Statistics Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zhang, H., & Wu, D. (2022). The Impact of Transport Infrastructure on Rural Industrial Integration: Spatial Spillover Effects and Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity. Land, 11(7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles